Re: There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

On Apr 5, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Jayachandran C. wrote: > > > The asn1 library has a export map containing 'global: *', this exports > two symbols _fdata and _ftext versioned. When libkafs5 is linked, > these symbols confuse the bfd code and the entries corresponding to > theses (index 13, and 16)

Re: There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:39:00 -0700 > Juli Mallett mentioned: > >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:28, Doug Barton wrote: >> > But as always, if someone comes up with an actual problem related to the >> > [BIND] update I'm happy to address it. >>

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-04-06 01:36:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-06 01:36:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

Garrett Cooper writes: > Forgot a key piece of info. My VM that this works on is i386, not > amd64. I assume that's a trigger? Frankly, I have no idea... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:35:06 -0700 Garrett Cooper mentioned: > 2012/4/5 Dag-Erling Smørgrav : > > Garrett Cooper writes: > >> From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host > >> environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of CURRENT > >> compiled from r233913 sourc

Re: projects/mfi_head to -current next week

On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:31 -0700, Alex Keda wrote: > On 16.03.2012 19:39, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'd like to start merging mfi(4) from projects/head_mfi into -current > > next week. The mfi(4) driver is stable and I don't know of any issues > > with it now. I fixed a few issu

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012/4/5 Dag-Erling Smørgrav : > Garrett Cooper writes: >> From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host >> environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of CURRENT >> compiled from r233913 sources. > > There is nothing special about the tinderbox host environment, i

Re: There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

Stanislav Sedov writes: > What I still cannot understand is that why my workaround doesn't work > on tinderbox and for some people builds. It should disable linking > agains libasn1 for libkafs5 completely on mips which is the source of > the problem in libkafs5. The complete build log is here:

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

Garrett Cooper writes: > From what I saw it seems to be localized to the tinderbox host > environment because I don't run into this issue with a copy of CURRENT > compiled from r233913 sources. There is nothing special about the tinderbox host environment, it's a quad-core Phenom running 8.3-STAB

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

Mike Tancsa writes: > Doug Barton writes: > > Thanks for confirming. I also forgot to mention that all the related > > changes were made in the same commit, so I'm not sure what the issue > > could have been. > The logs / progress are visible at http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/ > It looks like pc98

Re: contrib/jemalloc

On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:56:45 am Jason Evans wrote: >> >> * Will the utrace feature be missed? I removed it some time ago, mainly >> because traces are impossibly large for most real-world use cases. > > I will only speak to this one. I

Re: [RFT] Major snd_hda rewrite

On 06.04.2012 00:20, Jaroslav Suchanek wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:05 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:02:13PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 01/12/12 15:04, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:57:52PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 01/12/12 14:18, Yuri P

Re: [RFT] Major snd_hda rewrite

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:05 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:02:13PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > > On 01/12/12 15:04, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:57:52PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > > >> On 01/12/12 14:18, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Jan

Re: There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:39:00 -0700 Juli Mallett mentioned: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:28, Doug Barton wrote: > > But as always, if someone comes up with an actual problem related to the > > [BIND] update I'm happy to address it. > > The MIPS tinderbox build is currently broken. This is related

Re: Python won't build?

Quoting John Nielsen : On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:21 PM, John Nielsen wrote: I updated a machine yesterday from 9-STABLE to 10-CURRENT (r233631). Everything went smoothly with the update itself, but I ran in to an issue with Python when rebuilding all of my installed ports. Python won't build

Re: contrib/jemalloc

On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: >> I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as >> contrib/jemalloc: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch > >> * Are t

Re: There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

On 4/5/2012 12:39 PM, Juli Mallett wrote: > You have not broken the MIPS tinderbox. It has been broken for a > couple of weeks now, and is a known problem, and hopefully will be > fixed soon. *phew* Thanks for letting me know. :) Doug ___ freebsd-curre

There is a known problem with MIPS tinderbox.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:28, Doug Barton wrote: > But as always, if someone comes up with an actual problem related to the > [BIND] update I'm happy to address it. The MIPS tinderbox build is currently broken. This is related to a binutils bug for which a workaround was committed to head. For

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

On 4/5/2012 3:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > > Thanks for confirming. I also forgot to mention that all the related > changes were made in the same commit, so I'm not sure what the issue > could have been. The logs / progress are visible at http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/ It looks like pc98 i386 built

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

On 4/5/2012 12:22 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent >> tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm >> going to assume that this was a transient error unl

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent > tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm > going to assume that this was a transient error unless something else > comes up. From what I s

Re: contrib/jemalloc

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:55:48AM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: > On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: > >> I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as > >> contrib/jemalloc: > >> > >>http://pe

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

FYI, the BIND update passed a full 'make universe,' and a subsequent tinderbox message for mips/mips failed in a different location, so I'm going to assume that this was a transient error unless something else comes up. Doug On 4/5/2012 3:06 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

On 05.04.2012 21:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, [Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...] 2012/2/17 Alexander Motin: On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motinwrote: On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2012,

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-04-05 17:28:57 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-05 17:29:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-05 17:29:32 - /usr/bin/c

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

Hi, [Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...] 2012/2/17 Alexander Motin : > On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote: >>>

Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9.0 and -CURRENT

Hi folks, Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers groups and let a variable q

Re: contrib/jemalloc

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: > I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as > contrib/jemalloc: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch > * Are the symbol versioning specifications right, and are the > compati

Re: [regression] unable to boot: no GEOM devices found.

On Thursday, April 05, 2012 4:40:32 am David Naylor wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:37:35 John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, May 09, 2011 2:24:37 pm David Naylor wrote: > > > On Friday 15 April 2011 23:29:55 David Naylor wrote: > > > > On Friday 15 April 2011 18:28:06 John Baldwin wrote: >

Re: contrib/jemalloc

On Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:56:45 am Jason Evans wrote: > I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as > contrib/jemalloc: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch > > This is the first update to FreeBSD's jemalloc in over two years, and t

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-05 06:29:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-05 06:29:19 - /usr/bin

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:43:04AM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > ... > > Summary: as before, I believe that the patch didn't hurt anything, but > > it also doesn't restrict the usable size of /tmp to the specified size > > (from /etc/fstab): > > > > I've checked on i386 and patch worked as expecte

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-04-05 06:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-05 06:28:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-05 06:28:15 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-04-05 09:33:54 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-05 09:34:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-05 09:34:41 - /usr/bin/c

Re: [regression] unable to boot: no GEOM devices found.

On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:37:35 John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, May 09, 2011 2:24:37 pm David Naylor wrote: > > On Friday 15 April 2011 23:29:55 David Naylor wrote: > > > On Friday 15 April 2011 18:28:06 John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:07:06 pm David Naylor wrote: >

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On (04/04/2012 06:38), David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:50:35PM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > ... > > tmpfs-32bit-size_max.patch.txt should fix the problem. I don't have i386 > > installations to test it myself. > > > > Do you run PAE kernel? Could you try filling up /tmp at le

Re: -ffast-math in Ports and wrong generated code

On 04/05/12 01:46, Andrey Simonenko wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:45:25AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 04/04/12 04:29, Andrey Simonenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: The SVN commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=228756 will