Hi All,
Is there are an iSCSI Software Target that you can recommend. I have tried
using istgt ( on Freebsd7.2) with Windows iSCSI Software Initiator. The
initiator is able to discover the target however it is unable to login to the
target.
The login Response shows that the = <0203>
indicatin
On 2012-03-07 05:51, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size for
> boot2 is not enough to hold code generated by clang. Reverting r232570
> fixes it.
Please test the attached diff. Since it modifies bsd.sys.mk, either run
"make install" in share/mk, or
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:43:42PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any reason why we shouldn't throw this into contrib/ and
> treating it like a vendor thing?
> Or is this explicitly not being treated as a vendor FS?
No idea. This should be a decision of the person who imports the fi
Hi,
Is there any reason why we shouldn't throw this into contrib/ and
treating it like a vendor thing?
Or is this explicitly not being treated as a vendor FS?
Other than that, sure, let's get it into the tree and then thrash it
until it's stable..
adrian
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:20:24PM -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created
> a patch against HEAD which I have now subjected to testing using
> tools/regression/fsx.
>
> The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/
Howdy,
I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a patch
against HEAD
which I have now subjected to testing using tools/regression/fsx.
The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/head-fuse-1.diff
I would like to commit this patch in the next few days, so, ple
On Thursday 08 March 2012 10:46 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:18:56 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 11:51 pm, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> > > I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size
> > > for boot2 is not enough to hold code generated b
On 8 March 2012 07:43, John Baldwin wrote:
> However, you could do that by having a net80211_ifattach() type thing that
> sets if_transmit and invokes the driver-provided if_start. I don't think
> wireless devices are using multiple transmit queues in such a way that
> if_transmit would be a ben
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:43:52 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 March 2012 11:17, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:12:55 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> .. except that the default if_transmit handling breaks fragments. Sigh.
> >>
> >> So we're going to have to implement if_trans
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:18:56 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 11:51 pm, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> > I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size for
> > boot2 is not enough to hold code generated by clang. Reverting
> > r232570 fixes it.
> >
> > ===> sys/boot/i
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 11:51 pm, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
>> I am not familiar with boot2, but it looks like allocated size for
>> boot2 is not enough to hold code generated by clang. Reverting
>> r232570 fixes it.
>>
>> ===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 (a
e fix.
>
> OK, I'd do so. I don't need mcast stuff for the time being,
> instead I'd check other area such as suspend/resume for the next target.
>
> Today's one at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/iwi/iwi-20120308.diff
>
> # 2 lines fix, after all ;)
ime being,
instead I'd check other area such as suspend/resume for the next target.
Today's one at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/iwi/iwi-20120308.diff
# 2 lines fix, after all ;)
Thanks!
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:45:11 -0800
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: patches for if_iwi and wlan for WEP mode
> To: Mitsuru IWASAKI
> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org,
> bschm...@freebsd.org
> Message-ID:
>
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:29:16 +0200, Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios wrote
Hi,
> > 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on
> > GNU/Linux, so I would assume it will be the same on FreeBSD with
> > webcamd and not worth the $30? (which also frees up space for
> > 3x3 antenna)
Yep, the
15 matches
Mail list logo
