On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The portmgr team has not yet started regular package builds for -current.
> We are working on re-allocating some resources to be able to do so.
>
> Note, however, that with -current being an early branch of a new major
> version, that the sr
The portmgr team has not yet started regular package builds for -current.
We are working on re-allocating some resources to be able to do so.
Note, however, that with -current being an early branch of a new major
version, that the src that we are building against is changing rapidly.
My personal r
i.e. ACPI-fast, TSC-low etc. etc.?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi All,
Is it safe to assume that when a driver receives an Ethernet frame to transmit
with CSUM_TSO bit set in
m_head->m_pkthdr.csum_flags ; where m_head is the first (struct mbuf) in the
mbuf chain
that the [Ethernet Header] + [VLAN Tag if present] + [IP Header] + [TCP Header]
are all pre
O. Hartmann wrote:
On 02/15/12 13:58, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-15 13:37, O. Hartmann wrote:
;-) Problem: I can not even login anymore, since I have "insecured" the
console for security reasons and the shell is rejecting due to a symbol
missing. I tried booting into single user mode, b
On 02/15/12 13:58, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-02-15 13:37, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> ;-) Problem: I can not even login anymore, since I have "insecured" the
>> console for security reasons and the shell is rejecting due to a symbol
>> missing. I tried booting into single user mode, but that doesn'
