Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lisc

2011-12-25 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-12-26 00:53, O. Hartmann wrote: I just run into this couriosity on the most recent build of FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG). A buildworld fails with the below shown error. No wonder, I issued prior to this buildworld a "make delete-old-files" and a bunch of files, libisc.so, libisc.a,

FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lisc

2011-12-25 Thread O. Hartmann
I just run into this couriosity on the most recent build of FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG). A buildworld fails with the below shown error. No wonder, I issued prior to this buildworld a "make delete-old-files" and a bunch of files, libisc.so, libisc.a, and buddies showed up - and got deleted.

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux, 6.1 Server

2011-12-25 Thread Radio młodych bandytów
Well, the post is OT, but I need some vent. On 2011-12-19 18:34, dan...@digsys.bg wrote: For example, few checkboxes with common sysctl tuning would be perfect, > even if they would be marked as "Experimental", or not recommended. By following this, we push FreeBSD into the Linux style of doi

starting the annual discussion regarding top(1)'s CPU usage statistics

2011-12-25 Thread Alexander Best
ok...so we all know that top(1) cannot compute the exact CPU usage for all processes, since some processes get spawned and exit so fast that they don't fall into the calculation range. i think nobody is getting angry when top(1) is off by a few percent. however please take a look at the following

Re: Why does kern.module_path use ";" and not ":"?

2011-12-25 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote: > I just got tripped up by this difference in a minor way.  Is there a > particular reason kern_linker uses semicolon as a seperator instead of the > more common colon? A comment in /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_linker.c says: * The search path c

Re[2]: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

2011-12-25 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, John. Вы писали 20 декабря 2011 г., 16:52:44: JB> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 6:21:27 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:00:23AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > An update. I've sent Pawel a testing patch to see if my hypothesis is >> > correct >> > (www

Re: scheduler panic

2011-12-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 12/23/2011 8:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote: The sloppiest fix might be to do this: Index: sched_ule.c === - --- sched_ule.c (revision 228777) +++ sched_ule.c (working copy) @@ -14

Re: [rfc] removing -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 flag for i386?

2011-12-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote: On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote: On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote: ... the gcc(1) man page states the following: " This extra alignment does consume extr

Why does kern.module_path use ";" and not ":"?

2011-12-25 Thread Stefan Bethke
I just got tripped up by this difference in a minor way. Is there a particular reason kern_linker uses semicolon as a seperator instead of the more common colon? Stefan -- Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mai

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 25. Dec 2011, at 11:42 , Justin Hibbits wrote: >>> Sorry about this, bad patch when I tested the build. I'll fix it tomorrow >>> when I get time. >> >> >> Something like this? >> >> Andreas >> >> Index: hwpmc_powerpc.c >> === >

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-12-25 11:42:21 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-25 11:42:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-12-25 11:42:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-12-25 11:42:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-12-25 11:42:46 - /u

lost inode, no backup

2011-12-25 Thread Randy Bush
FreeBSD ran.psg.com 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Dec 24 12:33:51 UTC 2011 r...@ran.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RAN amd64 so doing all the wonderful holiday security upgrades and hit an ugly. these two problems may not be related. problem one on reboot, /usr/home was emp

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-12-25 11:06:31 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-25 11:06:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-12-25 11:06:31 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-12-25 11:06:44 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-12-25 11:06:44 - /usr

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Dec 25, 2011 5:27 AM, "Andreas Tobler" wrote: > > On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote: >> >> On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: >>> >>> >>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on >> >> freebsd-current.sentex.ca >>> >>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting H

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote: On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - cleaning