on 12/12/2011 00:06 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
>
>
> 2011/12/11 Andriy Gapon mailto:a...@freebsd.org>>
>
>
> There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via
> syscons.
> This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also
> expect
FWIW, it should be easy to ship a config file for that soekris, which
just does:
include GENERIC
device mptable
It may be worthwhile at least considering this (along with a couple of
comments explaining why the default kernel doesn't work on the soekris
board) for 9.0.
Question: can you load it
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:31 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:25 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:30 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:30 - /usr/bin
--- On Sat, 12/10/11, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what CAM IOCTL number change others
> are
> > > referring to but
> > > you certainly need to rebuild libcam consumers
> after
> > > r225950, which
> > > was merged to stable/9 in r226067 on October 6
> 2011.
> > > Marius
> > Than
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:24 - /usr/bin/c
2011/12/11 Andriy Gapon
>
> There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via
> syscons.
> This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also
> expects
> some input. Some examples are:
> - asking for a root filesystem specification
> - entering ddb
> - a
There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via syscons.
This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also expects
some input. Some examples are:
- asking for a root filesystem specification
- entering ddb
- asking to press a key for reboot
In this ca
on 11/12/2011 23:12 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
> Hello, Andriy.
> You wrote 11 декабря 2011 г., 23:12:34:
>
Is it true? Is it possible to have FreeBSD/amd64 without ACPI?
>>> It seems, that "device mptable" in kernel config helps.
>>> Why is it not in GENERIC kernel?
>> Just a g
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 11 декабря 2011 г., 23:12:34:
>>> Is it true? Is it possible to have FreeBSD/amd64 without ACPI?
>> It seems, that "device mptable" in kernel config helps.
>> Why is it not in GENERIC kernel?
> Just a guess, maybe because GENERIC kernel is for "generic" hardware.
Oh
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 11/12/2011 11:27 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
>> Hello, Freebsd-current.
>> You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
>>
>>> Soekris ("famous" developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
>>> hardware) released net6501 some time ago
--- Dom 11/12/11, Kostik Belousov ha scritto:
>
> If you wanted to get responses from experts only, sorry in
> advance.
>
I am no fs expert but just thought I'd mention some things
based on my playing with the BSD ext2fs ...
> The fs (AKA UFS) uses clustering provided by the block
> cache. T
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:27 - /usr/bin
on 11/12/2011 11:27 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
> Hello, Freebsd-current.
> You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
>
>> Soekris ("famous" developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
>> hardware) released net6501 some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
>> CPU.
>> It seems, tha
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:21 - /usr/bin/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/12/2011 14:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date.
>>> I would be perfectly okay with using a different utility -
>>> however, I would strongly
On 12/11/11 08:39, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
"Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote:
Hi Daniel;
--- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen wrote:
...
I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way
and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that
could replace CVS in the above scenario.
I have to say I a
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:42:01PM -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a question for fs wizards.
>
> suppose i can persuade modern spinning disk to do "large" reads (say
> 512K to 1M) at a time. also, suppose file system on such modern
> spinning drive is used to store large files
On 2011-12-09 10:10:18, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Soekris ("famous" developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
> hardware) released *net6501* some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
> CPU. It seems, that 64-bit version of Linux could run on it without
problems.
> But FreeBSD/amd64 can
--- Dom 11/12/11, Julian H. Stacey ha scritto:
...
> > I have to say I am surprised by all the people that
> > still use CVS (for their own good reasons).
> >
> > It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate
> > OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does
> > seem to have some
"Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote:
> Hi Daniel;
>
> --- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> ...
> >
> > I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way
> > and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that
> > could replace CVS in the above scenario.
> >
>
> I have to say I am surprised by
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, wrote:
>
> > I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date. I would
> > be perfectly okay with using a different utility - however, I would
> > strongly prefer that this utility was included in the base system.
>
> CVS != csup.
>
> I wonder how
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 04:35, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I think you're missing the point a little.
> >
> > The point is, you have to keep in mind how comfortable people feel
> > about things, and progress sometimes makes people uncomfortable. I
> > think you should leave these changes ba
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:33 - /usr/bin
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Maksim Yevmenkin
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a question for fs wizards.
There is a list for them:
freebsd...@freebsd.org
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, cumu
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:25 - /usr/bin/c
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:09 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
> TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:3
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
> Soekris ("famous" developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
> hardware) released net6501 some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
> CPU.
> It seems, that 64-bit version of Linux could run on it without
> problems.
>
On 12/11/11 00:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> [-questions to bcc]
>
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 12/07/11 07:11, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:56:31AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
config.status: creating ada/Makefile
config.status: creating auto-host.h
On 12/11/11 01:11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/11 14:51, Chuck Burns wrote:
>>> On Saturday, December 10, 2011 7:35:27 AM Chuck Burns wrote:
Here is quick, hackish patch to allow your make update to work, it
appears
that the Makefile
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:31 - /usr/bin
32 matches
Mail list logo
