On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
Here we go again :-)
Out of the kernel headers that are installed in /usr/include/ hierracy, there
are some which include support multiple operating systems (usually FreeBSD and
other *BSD flavours).
This patch adds support to detect GNU/kFreeBSD as we
On Thursday November 24 2011 01:35:28 Ryan Stone wrote:
> If you can get it back into this state,
Sure, *every* time.
> a procstat -k -k would be very helpful.
> (the second -k is not a typo).
# procstat -k -k 5896
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
58
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Mark Martinec
wrote:
> Problem: the iscontrol process starts normally and establishes
> a session and brings up a device, but it cannot be stopped.
> It does not react to a HUP signal, and neither to KILL.
If you can get it back into this state, a procstat -k -k
Problem: the iscontrol process starts normally and establishes
a session and brings up a device, but it cannot be stopped.
It does not react to a HUP signal, and neither to KILL.
The /dev/da0 device is operational and the remote disk remains
normally accessible, regardless of how I try to (unsucce
Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the
> > "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in
> > the client and avoids the NLM.
> >
> > Good luck with it and please let us know how i
2011/11/23 Jan Dušátko :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask people in this conference for advice regards
> cross-architecture compiling.
> Right now I have 32-bit system, where I need to boot over TFTP/NFS diferrent
> architectures (i386/AMD64). I need to populate appropriate directory
> structure using
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
> I often use the serial console on my servers through ILOM remote console
> access to install FreeBSD because it lets me cut and paste commands into a
> live shell from install media. Back with FreeBSD 8.x and previous, the
> console worked
I often use the serial console on my servers through ILOM remote console
access to install FreeBSD because it lets me cut and paste commands into
a live shell from install media. Back with FreeBSD 8.x and previous,
the console worked as a dual console between the redirected VGA/keyboard
consol
Hi All,
23.11.2011 18:37, Jan Dušátko пишет:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask people in this conference for advice regards
> cross-architecture compiling.
> Right now I have 32-bit system, where I need to boot over TFTP/NFS diferrent
> architectures (i386/AMD64). I need to populate appropriate direc
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
> I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the
> "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in
> the client and avoids the NLM.
>
> Good luck with it and please let us know how it goes, rick
This seems to
* Ed Schouten , 2023 19:11:
> There are two reasons why I changed the default terminal emulator to be
> xterm-like, instead of conforming to cons25:
Errr... for large values of two.
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpifNuiJHbAs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Jason,
* Jason Edwards , 2022 21:56:
> I wonder: is cons25 bugged or simply obsolete? Not that I want to keep
> cons25; just being curious.
There are two reasons why I changed the default terminal emulator to be
xterm-like, instead of conforming to cons25:
- It is more compatible. Not all
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-11-23 17:41, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Not sure what this all means, but when I attempt to check out HEAD
> > on an
> > NFS mount in the fbsd cluster (nfs server is a netapp filer), I'm
> > getting an odd failure error.
> >
> >
> > FreeBSD bhyve.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT
Dinitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-11-23 17:41, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Not sure what this all means, but when I attempt to check out HEAD
> > on an
> > NFS mount in the fbsd cluster (nfs server is a netapp filer), I'm
> > getting an odd failure error.
> >
> >
> > FreeBSD bhyve.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT
Sean Bruno wrote:
> Not sure what this all means, but when I attempt to check out HEAD on
> an
> NFS mount in the fbsd cluster (nfs server is a netapp filer), I'm
> getting an odd failure error.
>
>
> FreeBSD bhyve.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> r227883:
> Wed Nov 23 06:08:40
On 2011-11-23 17:41, Sean Bruno wrote:
Not sure what this all means, but when I attempt to check out HEAD on an
NFS mount in the fbsd cluster (nfs server is a netapp filer), I'm
getting an odd failure error.
FreeBSD bhyve.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r227883:
Wed Nov 23 06:0
Not sure what this all means, but when I attempt to check out HEAD on an
NFS mount in the fbsd cluster (nfs server is a netapp filer), I'm
getting an odd failure error.
FreeBSD bhyve.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r227883:
Wed Nov 23 06:08:40 PST 2011
sbr...@bhyve.freebsd.org:/u
Hi,
I would like to ask people in this conference for advice regards
cross-architecture compiling.
Right now I have 32-bit system, where I need to boot over TFTP/NFS diferrent
architectures (i386/AMD64). I need to populate appropriate directory
structure using some "generalized" kernel configurati
Am 23.11.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Bruce Cran:
> On 23/11/2011 14:06, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162787
>
> That's a much better PR than the one I submitted about the problem last year:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/151229 :)
Sorry, I did
On 23/11/2011 14:06, Stefan Bethke wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162787
That's a much better PR than the one I submitted about the problem last
year: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/151229 :)
--
Bruce Cran
___
fre
Am 23.11.2011 um 13:41 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
> Am 23.11.2011 um 11:07 schrieb Aleksandr Rybalko:
>
>> Hi peoples who stay current!
>>
>> Several days ago I made fresh installation of 9.0-RC2.
>> I found that new installer is very easy and very usable.
>> But found small problem:
>> When I doing
Am 23.11.2011 um 11:07 schrieb Aleksandr Rybalko:
> Hi peoples who stay current!
>
> Several days ago I made fresh installation of 9.0-RC2.
> I found that new installer is very easy and very usable.
> But found small problem:
> When I doing interface configuration, I press instead of
> and then
TB --- 2011-11-23 09:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 09:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-11-23 09:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 09:50:28 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 09:50:28 - /usr/bin
[...]
> Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
>
[igor's email was corrected]
We will test it in out environment and let you know.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
Hi peoples who stay current!
Several days ago I made fresh installation of 9.0-RC2.
I found that new installer is very easy and very usable.
But found small problem:
When I doing interface configuration, I press instead of
and then for return press , after that dialog was closed
with only IP fie
TB --- 2011-11-23 05:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 05:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-11-23 05:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 05:10:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 05:10:39 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:57:53 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:57:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:57:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:58:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:58:03 - /u
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:38:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:38:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:38:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:38:09 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:38:09 - /usr
TB --- 2011-11-23 08:10:22 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 08:10:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-11-23 08:10:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 08:10:30 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 08:10:30 - /usr
Am 22.11.2011 um 21:56 schrieb Jason Edwards:
> I wonder: is cons25 bugged or simply obsolete? Not that I want to keep
> cons25; just being curious.
cons25 is no more, syscons speaks xterm now, thanks to Ed Schouten and his
libteken.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:17:20 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:17:20 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:17:20 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:17:28 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-23 07:17:28 - /usr/bin/c
31 matches
Mail list logo
