On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source
of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more,
Hello,
(cross-posted message; please keep eventual comments on freebsd-hackers@)
The FreeBSD project has been accepted to the Google Code-In 2011 contest.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-code-in-2011-participating.html
We have proposed 50 tasks so far, and more ar
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Sunday 20 November 2011 15:24:41 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> > I have tried issuing a TUR to all my drives to see if it was controller
>> > or drive specific, but all of them return the same error (The drives are
>> > Seagate, Hitachi and W
Am 20.11.2011 um 14:41 schrieb Jason Edwards:
> Some of you asked for the environmental settings. Using 'env' the
> output begins with:
>
> -- on console --
> TERM=cons25
> SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
>
> -- via SSH --
> TERM=xterm
> SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
>
> Via SSH the ee editor works as it
On Sun Nov 20 11, Jason Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards:
> >
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console
> >> direct access, opening the easy editor has sever
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up
>> >> vm_map.c:
>> >> http://www.f
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up
> >> vm_map.c:
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch
>>
>> What do you think about it?
>
> This one only changes the KBI ? Note
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch
>
> What do you think about it?
This one only changes the KBI ? Note that _sx suffix is not reserved.
p
2011/11/20 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>>> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2011/11
hail,
I just installed 9.0 RC2 in Aspire One 751h and the atheros shows in ifconfig:
ath0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290
ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
nd6 options=29
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g
status: associated
wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
It looks good to me.
Attilio
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:02:14PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
>> > +#define vm_page_lock_assert(m, a) \
>> > + vm_page_lock_assert_KBI((m), (a), LOCK_FILE, LOCK_LINE)
>>
>> I think you shoul
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:02:14PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> > +#define vm_page_lock_assert(m, a) \
> > + vm_page_lock_assert_KBI((m), (a), LOCK_FILE, LOCK_LINE)
>
> I think you should put the "\" in the last tab and also, for
> consistency, you may
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> > Please consider:
>> > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/mutexfileline2.patch
>>
>> This is now committed as r227758,227759, you can update your patch now.
> Here is it.
>
> dif
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source
> > of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more, I argue that we shall
> > not rely on c
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
> > Please consider:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/mutexfileline2.patch
>
> This is now committed as r227758,227759, you can update your patch now.
Here is it.
diff --git a/sys/vm/vm_page.c b/sys/vm/vm_p
2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On
On Sunday 20 November 2011 15:24:41 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > I have tried issuing a TUR to all my drives to see if it was controller
> > or drive specific, but all of them return the same error (The drives are
> > Seagate, Hitachi and WD).
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> You are sending SCSI co
on 20/11/2011 16:54 Pegasus Mc Cleaft said the following:
> Hi Nima,
>
> I have tried your latest patch against current, but I am having
> difficulty
> getting it to work. I was wondering, is this feature limited to SCSI drives?
> I have been trying it against my SATA drives but it look
Hi Nima,
I have tried your latest patch against current, but I am having
difficulty
getting it to work. I was wondering, is this feature limited to SCSI drives?
I have been trying it against my SATA drives but it looks like it is failing
on issuing a TUR.
IE:
feathers# camcontrol
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console
>> direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs:
>>
>> 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source
> of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more, I argue that we shall
> not rely on compiler for this at all. Ideally, we should be able to
> build FreeBSD
22 matches
Mail list logo
