Re: 9.0-RC2 - bsdinstall miscount of remaining diskspace after partition deletion.

2011-11-19 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 11/18/11 17:09, nev...@tx.net wrote: If you are performating a manual partion in 9.0-RC2 bsdinstall and you delete any created partition except the most recently created one, the total remaining space will be miscalculated. Reproducable as shown below. Workaround: if you delete a parti

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Jan Beich
Jason Edwards writes: > Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console > direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: > > 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 > 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of the boundary (line 0) > 3) the keys

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> > .. how many users is this going to trip up? > >> > >> cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> > .. how many users is this going to trip up? >> >> cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I >> went through se

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > .. how many users is this going to trip up? > > cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I > went through several iterations with ed@ over the fact that various > curses b

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. how many users is this going to trip up? cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I went through several iterations with ed@ over the fact that various curses based apps were broken with the libteken work, but th

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. how many users is this going to trip up? adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [Sbcl-bugs] crash in sb-concurrency tests after r216641 on x86-64/freebsd9/sb-thread

2011-11-19 Thread Jan Beich
Nikodemus Siivola writes: >> After r216641 sbcl built with sb-thread dies on mailbox tests. It also >> dies when I try to complete a symbol in slime. The workaround seems to >> be to revert libthr to r216640. > >> Any clue whether it's a FreeBSD bug or a SBCL bug? I've Bcc'd sbcl-bugs@ >> in case

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Methinks your $TERM is set incorrectly. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [PATCH] Detect GNU/kFreeBSD in user-visible kernel headers

2011-11-19 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/11/18 Robert Millan : > > 2011/11/17 John Baldwin : > >> Hmm, I wonder if it's better to use the #ifndef approach rather than #undef > >> so that when compilers are updated to DTRT we will honor their settings? > > > > Well, the

Re: 9RC2 amd64 "Can't work out which disk we are booting from"

2011-11-19 Thread Jakub Lach
...and booting dvd rc2 iso works. I actually installed from it to the usbdisk, just booting usb is broken. On the side note, bsdinstall is OK, missing maybe space/enter mapped action reminder, and certainly "back" button. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9RC

Re: 9RC2 amd64 "Can't work out which disk we are booting from"

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Actually when I was trying to build amd64 image from sources from about PRE-RC1 I have exactly same error. But I have not found what it was, and switched to build i386 images only yet. 2011/11/19 Jakub Lach > Hello. > > I'm almost positive it's probably my fault, > but anyway, I have installed F

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: > Dear list, > > Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console > direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: > > 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 > 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instea

Re: crash in sb-concurrency tests after r216641 on x86-64/freebsd9/sb-thread

2011-11-19 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:00:07AM +, Nali Toja wrote: > After r216641 sbcl built with sb-thread dies on mailbox tests. It also > dies when I try to complete a symbol in slime. The workaround seems to > be to revert libthr to r216640. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154050

ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Jason Edwards
Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of the boundary (line 0) 3) the keys page up and page down

Re: [Sbcl-bugs] crash in sb-concurrency tests after r216641 on x86-64/freebsd9/sb-thread

2011-11-19 Thread Nikodemus Siivola
On 12 October 2011 03:00, Nali Toja wrote: > After r216641 sbcl built with sb-thread dies on mailbox tests. It also > dies when I try to complete a symbol in slime. The workaround seems to > be to revert libthr to r216640. > Any clue whether it's a FreeBSD bug or a SBCL bug? I've Bcc'd sbcl-bugs

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 Available...

2011-11-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
> On 18/11/2011 10:53, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > > Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0 > > instead of RELENG_9 ? > Not screwed, but you'll be running 9.0-PRERELEASE rather than 9.0-RC2. > If you want to switch to

9RC2 amd64 "Can't work out which disk we are booting from"

2011-11-19 Thread Jakub Lach
Hello. I'm almost positive it's probably my fault, but anyway, I have installed FreeBSD on laptop from source (9-STABLE), on the same machine I can't boot RC2 usb.img due to "Can't work out which disk we are booting.." and after installing RC2 on usbstick and trying to boot it, same problem oc

Re: [PATCH] Detect GNU/kFreeBSD in user-visible kernel headers

2011-11-19 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/18 Robert Millan : > 2011/11/17 John Baldwin : >> Hmm, I wonder if it's better to use the #ifndef approach rather than #undef >> so that when compilers are updated to DTRT we will honor their settings? > > Well, the compiler is supposed to know better than sys/param.h, I gave this a bit mo