Hi,
I encountered newvers.sh issue while working locally with git tree.
The last patch broke correct versioning. The issue is the "break" after
checking the svnversion cmd.
I use git for local work and have svnversion cmd too. So the first check
is true and break makes exit from further processi
nev...@tx.net wrote:
If you are performating a manual partion in 9.0-RC2 bsdinstall and you
delete any created partition except the most recently created one, the
total remaining space will be miscalculated. Reproducable as shown below.
Workaround: if you delete a partition that is not the
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to install FreeBSD-9.0-RC2-amd64-dvd1.iso (SHA256 verified) on
a VM and meet a reproducible problem:
The VM has 128Mo RAM and a 4Go hard drive.
During install process I choose these distribution sets: port
If you are performating a manual partion in 9.0-RC2 bsdinstall and
you delete any created partition except the most recently created
one, the total remaining space will be miscalculated. Reproducable
as shown below.
Workaround: if you delete a partition that is not the last
partition that
on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> Hmmm, you could also make critical_exit() not perform deferred preemptions
>> if SCHEDULER_STOPPED? That would fix the recursion and still let the
>> preemption "work" when resum
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:16:00AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 09:54, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > One more thing (i am mentioning it here for archival purposes,
> > as i keep forgetting to test it). Is entropy harvesting expensive ?
>
> No. It was designed to be inexpensive on purpose. :)
On 11/18/2011 09:54, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> One more thing (i am mentioning it here for archival purposes,
> as i keep forgetting to test it). Is entropy harvesting expensive ?
No. It was designed to be inexpensive on purpose. :)
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:20:04PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2011 12:06:15 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> > A bit more context: Matteo is looking at the latency of RPCs across
> > the network involving userspace processes, and possibly using the
> > netmap API. As we underst
On 18/11/2011 18:21, George Kontostanos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Luchesar V. ILIEV
> wrote:
>> On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (h
On Friday, November 18, 2011 12:06:15 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:00:06AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, November 18, 2011 3:46:02 am Matteo Landi wrote:
> > > > you probably want to be using MSI-X for a 10G NIC instead of INTx
> > > > anyway.
> > >
> > > Why do
Hi,
Is there nice way in FreeBSD to force reprobe of devices for specific
driver like it is done when kernel module is loaded (via
DRIVER_MODULE(...) stuff)?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-c
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:00:06AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2011 3:46:02 am Matteo Landi wrote:
> > > you probably want to be using MSI-X for a 10G NIC instead of INTx anyway.
> >
> > Why do you say that? Is MSI-X faster than INTx in terms of interrupt
> > latency? When
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Luchesar V. ILIEV
wrote:
> On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
>>> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
>>> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like t
2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>>> >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM
On Friday, November 18, 2011 3:46:02 am Matteo Landi wrote:
> > you probably want to be using MSI-X for a 10G NIC instead of INTx anyway.
>
> Why do you say that? Is MSI-X faster than INTx in terms of interrupt
> latency? When should I use MSI-X, instead of fast filters interrupts
> (fast interrup
TB --- 2011-11-18 11:00:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-18 11:00:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-11-18 11:00:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-18 11:00:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-18 11:00:24 - /usr/bin/csu
Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 11/17/11 13:14, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 11/17/11 11:06, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 11/17/11 10:15, Kostik Belousov w
On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
>> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
>> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
>> via SVN it is "svn://svn.freebsd.org
On 18/11/2011 10:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9
>
> Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0
> instead of RELENG_9 ?
Not screwed, but you'll be running 9.0-PRERELEASE rather than 9.0-RC2.
If you want to switch to the 9.0-RELEASE bra
On 17 Nov 2011, at 23:31, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox
> wrote:
>> TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
>> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
>> TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
>> TB --- 2011-11-17 18:10:0
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:56:55AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
> >>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:53:38AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> > tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
> > you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
> > via SVN it
2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> >> >>
> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
> via SVN it is "svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/". We still have
> the nit th
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> >> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> A 4G disk is perhaps quite rare these days, but I expect that the issue is
>> real. Please file the PR.
>>
Using flash media or setting small hard drive in a virtual machine is
not very rare :-)
And once installed (I need to use a mini
2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> >> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>> >> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kb
TB --- 2011-11-18 08:12:18 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-18 08:12:18 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-18 08:12:18 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-18 08:12:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-18 08:12:31 - /usr
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> The comments haven't kept up with the code. You are correct; in the
> legacy interrupt case ixgbe is using an ITHREAD, not a fast handler.
Do I have to send an email to the maintainer of the ixgbe driver and
ask him to update the comments, or
> you probably want to be using MSI-X for a 10G NIC instead of INTx anyway.
Why do you say that? Is MSI-X faster than INTx in terms of interrupt
latency? When should I use MSI-X, instead of fast filters interrupts
(fast interrupt?), instead of ithread interrupts? Thanks in advace.
Regards,
Matte
hi there,
i recently bought a western digital 1 terrabyte usb2/usb3 hdd:
[83611.209514] umass0: on usbus3
[83613.618514] da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus6 target 0 lun 0
[83613.618514] da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6
device
[83613.618514] da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
[83613.618514] da0: 953837MB (1
31 matches
Mail list logo
