TB --- 2011-10-29 03:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-29 03:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-29 03:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-29 03:10:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-29 03:10:55 - /usr/bin
> pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd
Cheers,
Matthew
> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
That did it! Now I can login as nonroot and startx.
I found pwd_mkdb in my searching, but would not have known to use '-p'. I
might have done
pwd_mkdb /etc/master.passwd
from Do
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Chuck Burns wrote:
I had some issues while running make installworld after I sync'd to the latest
releng9, on my RC1 install.
Now, it appears to failed, while trying to create some links,
chfn
chsh
ypchpass
ypchfn
ypchsh.
These are supposed to be hardlinked to /usr/bin/chp
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote:
OK. I'm baffled! I can't see anything that looks wrong, but I'll think
about it a bit more.
See my reply to Stas (cc'd to you). The issue is the damn
cable modem is sending the packets from random source PORTS, so
the -a entry needed a :* after the
On 10/28/2011 20:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> How does one run mergemaster without running r
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>
>>> I enabled remote logging for my home subnet, and syslogd doesn't seem(!)
>>> to
>>> be logging the messages.
>>>
>>> They ARE maki
On 10/28/2011 11:01 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:20:27 -0500
Larry Rosenman mentioned:
See the options lines
-a 192.168.200.0/24
And the Cable modem is sending to 514.
Please, read the manpage description for the '-a' switch.
The modem is sending to the port 514, it's
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
configuration?
>>>
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I enabled remote logging for my home subnet, and syslogd doesn't seem(!) to
be logging the messages.
They ARE making it to the system.
Can someone look at bin/162135 which has all the details, i
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> I enabled remote logging for my home subnet, and syslogd doesn't seem(!) to
> be logging the messages.
>
> They ARE making it to the system.
>
> Can someone look at bin/162135 which has all the details, including
> tcpdump to show that the
On 10/28/2011 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
>>> configuration?
>>
>> Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the -P option, an
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
>>> configuration?
>>
>> Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
>> configuration?
>
> Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the -P option, and/or add
> PRESERVE_FILES in your mergemaster rc
I enabled remote logging for my home subnet, and syslogd doesn't seem(!) to
be logging the messages.
They ARE making it to the system.
Can someone look at bin/162135 which has all the details, including
tcpdump to show that the messages are making it to the system.
Thanks!
--
Larry Rosenman
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, deeptec...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I don't have the intermediate object files for the kernel; now I'm
> building the kernel again (from the appropriate, exact sources). That
> shouldn't harm debugging, should it?
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On 10/28/2011 07:57, kama wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:14:51 am Ed Schouten wrote:
>>> * Tom Evans , 20111027 13:06:
I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
it will prompt you to install new pass
On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
> configuration?
Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the -P option, and/or add
PRESERVE_FILES in your mergemaster rc file. Watch the changes carefully.
If you have to, do the upda
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
>>> The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use
>>> extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this.
>>
>>I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too
>>large to not make
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com
wrote:
> With object files which were built using the original kernel
> configuration file (no debugging symbols included):
>
> #kgdb kernel /var/crash/vmcore.4
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dan wrote:
>
>
> Updated from 9.0 beta3 to RC1 and using mkvmerge over samba/zfs
> its taking over an hour to just mux in things like DTS english, where it was
> 15 minutes on beta3.
Hi Dan,
- Can you do more deterministic / scientific benchmarks?
- Did you upgrad
On 10/28/11 3:43 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:
The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use
extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this.
I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too
large to not make people go
>> The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use
>> extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this.
>
>I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too
>large to not make people go through the "I tell you three times"
>dance. It's n
With object files which were built using the original kernel
configuration file (no debugging symbols included):
#kgdb kernel /var/crash/vmcore.4
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welco
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I don't have the intermediate object files for the kernel; now I'm
>> building the kernel again (from the appropriate, exact sources). That
>> shouldn't harm debugging, should it? Meanwhile
> The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use
> extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this.
I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too
large to not make people go through the "I tell you three times"
dance. It's not lik
On 10/28/2011 12:37 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote:
are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and
already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect to
This is a good idea, except that it makes me really really nervous. I do
not believe that fw downloads are generic enough to encapsulate. I've
used camcontrol recently to tunnel an ATA command through mpt2 that does
an ATA DOWNLOAD FW (mode 7), but that is only because it is a specific
drive th
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nima Misaghian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have got code developed by Andre Albsmeier that is capable of
> programming firmware of hard drives from several vendors and turned
> it into a camcontrol command.
>
> The posted patch (against RELENG_8_2) basically adds the follo
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:25 -0700, Penta Upa wrote:
> Attached is a test module (vmtest) and the makefile used. Uname output from
> the system is
I only see a Makefile attached here. Can you attach the code you are
using?
Sean
___
freebsd-current@fre
Hi,
I have got code developed by Andre Albsmeier that is capable of
programming firmware of hard drives from several vendors and turned
it into a camcontrol command.
The posted patch (against RELENG_8_2) basically adds the following new
command to camcontrol:
camcontrol fwdownload [device id] [
Hi,
I have got code developed by Andre Albsmeier that is capable of
programming firmware of hard drives from several vendors and turned
it into a camcontrol command.
The posted patch (against RELENG_8_2) basically adds the following new
command to camcontrol:
camcontrol fwdownload [device id] [
On 2011-10-28 22:15, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
...
This latter problem is what my patch attempts to fix, while changing as
little as possible.
An alternative is to pass __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null to the 32-bit stage.
That should also work in the environment, see make.conf(5)
The problem with this, is
On 28/10/2011 20:19, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-10-28 16:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> ...
>> ...
>>
>> I had hoped that the .ifdef construction from the wiki was dated. I
>> suppose it's emulating setting CC in the environment instead of in
>> the make/src.conf.
>
> There are two different pr
* Ruslan Yakovlev , 20111028 17:45:
> nvenetlib.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `array'
>
> tws_services.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
G! $#(*@!&(*!@&#
I think you can work around this by removing either nve or tws.
I guess problems like these are mainly caus
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and
already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect to
have something to present in a week or two. It
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2011 20:51:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 08:42:09PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > This is the root HUB. Can you also show the actual device?
> >
> > Sorry, it wasn't
On 2011-10-28 16:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
...
Like that:
.if ${.CURDIR:M/usr/src} || ${.CURDIR:M/usr/src/*}
CC=clang
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
NO_WERROR=
WERROR=
.endif
I had hoped that the .ifdef construction from the wiki was dated. I
suppose it's emulating setting CC in the environment inst
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I'm seeing issues on a unicore systems running a derivative of FreeBSD
> 8.2-RELEASE if something calls mem_range_attr_set. It turns out that
> the root cause is a bug in smp_rendezvous_cpus. The first part of
> smp_rendezvous_cpus attempts to
Can't make buildkernel
MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh tinderbox
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -Wmissi
I'm seeing issues on a unicore systems running a derivative of FreeBSD
8.2-RELEASE if something calls mem_range_attr_set. It turns out that
the root cause is a bug in smp_rendezvous_cpus. The first part of
smp_rendezvous_cpus attempts to short-circuit the non-SMP case(note
that smp_started is nev
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:14:51 am Ed Schouten wrote:
> > * Tom Evans , 20111027 13:06:
> > > I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
> > > it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group
> > > files
Thank you Doug.
I have another machine on the way, that i can use for testing.
In the meantime, i got it to work with a reflashed controller, using
the mps driver.
I posted a "howto" to the forums
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27268
Best regards,
Roberto
Roberto de Iriarte write
On 26/10/2011 16:39, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-10-26 15:32, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> I haven't tried to dig into this. Only "unusual" properties of the system
>> are my non-default MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX and the use of ccache.
>>
>> # uname -a
>> FreeBSD AryaStark.norad 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
A panic occured while I was ``rm -rf''ing a large file&directory tree
(that I just created with untar) on an old drive that I have not used
for a long time. Unfortunately I'm not 100% sure that the filesystem
was clean when I mounted it today. Cou
On Friday, October 28, 2011 1:46:07 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:29:34AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> > On 10/26/11 22:53, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > The assertion would be triggered when the next packet arrives (as I said
> > > above). Try modifying your debugging
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:14:51 am Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Tom Evans , 20111027 13:06:
> > I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
> > it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group
> > files - if you have added local users you must not say yes t
On Friday, October 28, 2011 4:43:28 am Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from Tom Evans :
>
> I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
> > it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group
> > files - if you have added local users you must not say yes to this,
> >
On Tue, 2011-10-25 12:27 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > I face the same error since upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0RC1, is there any way to
> > fix that?
> errno == 19 => ENODEV -- so the question is, what device is missing?
I've got bitten by t
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Update: the fix didn't work, even though I have the necessary things in
> master.passwd and /etc/rc.conf .
Did you re-run pwd_mkdb?
> How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
> configuration?
>
So when merge
On 28/10/2011 11:05, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I still can't login as any nonroot user, even though I see the lines
> in /etc/master.passwd, which I copied back from backup, and if I
> startx as root, there is no response to keyboard or mouse.
pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd
Cheers,
from Tom Evans :
I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
> it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group
> files - if you have added local users you must not say yes to this,
> you must either merge the changes in or keep your local one.
> If you
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:59:57AM +0200, Marco Steinbach wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Chuck Burns wrote:
>
> >I had some issues while running make installworld after I sync'd to the
> >latest
> >releng9, on my RC1 install.
> >
> >Now, it appears to failed, while trying to create some link
A panic occured while I was ``rm -rf''ing a large file&directory tree
(that I just created with untar) on an old drive that I have not used
for a long time. Unfortunately I'm not 100% sure that the filesystem
was clean when I mounted it today. Could that result in such a panic?
I don't have the in
On Thursday 27 October 2011 02:34:11 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> In a message previously I mentioned the KDE4 problem for 8.2 amd64
Release
> , but that message even did not receive a single reply .
Things just may get lost, sorry.
> Install X .
> Install KDE4 .
> Login to console .
> Without
from Tom Evans :
I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
> it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group
> files - if you have added local users you must not say yes to this,
> you must either merge the changes in or keep your local one.
> If you
On Thursday 27 October 2011 20:51:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 08:42:09PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > This is the root HUB. Can you also show the actual device?
>
> Sorry, it wasn't connected, here it goes:
>
> ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=255 md=HOST spd=HIGH (48
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:45:47 +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to remind you that the next round of status reports
covering the third quarter of 2011 were due on October 15th, 2011. As
this initiative is very popular among our users, I would like to
ask you to submit your status
Hi,
why 5 weeks and not 4? Shouldn't we add a variable for the weekday to make it
more predictable?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors. Xin LI hat geschrieben:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
58 matches
Mail list logo
