Re: [UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0

2011-10-27 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:42:00 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Erwin Lansing wrote on 27.10.2011 14:21: > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that > > should include: > > a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10

Re: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

2011-10-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:29:34AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/26/11 22:53, John Baldwin wrote: > > The assertion would be triggered when the next packet arrives (as I said > > above). Try modifying your debugging output to also log if the ACK is > > delayed. I suspect it is not delaye

Re: make installworld fails on releng9

2011-10-27 Thread Marco Steinbach
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Chuck Burns wrote: I had some issues while running make installworld after I sync'd to the latest releng9, on my RC1 install. Now, it appears to failed, while trying to create some links, chfn chsh ypchpass ypchfn ypchsh. These are supposed to be hardlinked to /usr/bin/c

make installworld fails on releng9

2011-10-27 Thread Chuck Burns
I had some issues while running make installworld after I sync'd to the latest releng9, on my RC1 install. Now, it appears to failed, while trying to create some links, chfn chsh ypchpass ypchfn ypchsh. These are supposed to be hardlinked to /usr/bin/chpass, except that, since the other files a

samba+zfs

2011-10-27 Thread Dan
Updated from 9.0 beta3 to RC1 and using mkvmerge over samba/zfs its taking over an hour to just mux in things like DTS english, where it was 15 minutes on beta3. Dan. - Dan The Man CTO/ Senior System Administrator Websites, Domains and Everything else http://www.SunS

Re: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

2011-10-27 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/26/11 22:53, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:54:31 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 08:14:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, October 23, 2011 11:58:28 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:44:45AM +0300, Kostik Belousov

RE: Panics after AHCI timeouts

2011-10-27 Thread Pegasus Mc Cleaft
>> If it's only one process, the machine (usually) doesn't hang, even >> when that process is copying big files back and forth for a long >> period of time (it's a backup process). But interleave that process >> with another one accessing the same disk, and poof!, almost >> immediately ahci tim

Re: Panics after AHCI timeouts

2011-10-27 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:00:55 +0200 "C. P. Ghost" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alexander Kabaev > wrote: > > I do see timeouts on one of my Samsung ST3750330A disks and they > > definitely do not cause any panics. The weird part in my case is > > that disk then immediately reappears

Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7

2011-10-27 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/27/2011 12:05, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The attached implements that, and is almost certainly the right way to >> go. It would be nice if someone could test it, and better if someone >> else could commit it. I swore after the last time t

Re: [PATCH] Default scrub interval to whole weeks

2011-10-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > I think it might be better if we set scrub interval to whole weeks > (proposed changeset changes it to 5 weeks). > > The reason for this is to make it easier for system adminis

Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7

2011-10-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The attached implements that, and is almost certainly the right way to > go. It would be nice if someone could test it, and better if someone > else could commit it. I swore after the last time that I'd stay away > from that file precisely beca

[PATCH] Default scrub interval to whole weeks

2011-10-27 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I think it might be better if we set scrub interval to whole weeks (proposed changeset changes it to 5 weeks). The reason for this is to make it easier for system administrators to estimate when the scrub happens, for instance, if a scrub was d

Re: umass(4) regression in 9.0-RC1.

2011-10-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 08:42:09PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > This is the root HUB. Can you also show the actual device? Sorry, it wasn't connected, here it goes: ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=255 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON bLength = 0x0012 bDescriptorType = 0x0001 bcdUSB = 0x0

Re: umass(4) regression in 9.0-RC1.

2011-10-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 27 October 2011 20:40:37 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 08:30:44PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > What does usbconfig dump_device_desc, say about this device? > > ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) > pwr=SAVE > > bLength = 0x0012 > b

Re: umass(4) regression in 9.0-RC1.

2011-10-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 08:30:44PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > What does usbconfig dump_device_desc, say about this device? ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE bLength = 0x0012 bDescriptorType = 0x0001 bcdUSB = 0x0200 bDeviceClass = 0x0009 bDeviceSubC

Re: umass(4) regression in 9.0-RC1.

2011-10-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 27 October 2011 19:07:38 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > Hi. > > My SDHC card (via adapter) is no longer being detected after upgrade to > 9.0-RC1. The same card with this adapter works on my laptop with older > HEAD. > > usbus0: EHCI version 1.0 > usbus0: on ehci0 > u

Re: Should process in STOP state be swapped out?

2011-10-27 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/27/11 00:54, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > Wiadomość napisana przez Xin LI w dniu 27 paź 2011, o godz. 02:03: >> I've noticed that if I kill -STOP a process, the in-core size >> does not change even when there is memory pressure (what I'm >>

Re: LSI 9240-8i (IBM M1015) MegaRaid support

2011-10-27 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Roberto de Iriarte writes: | Hi, | | Is there any expectancy of getting this piece of hardware (or it's IBM | silbing, the M1015) working in MegaRaid mode, without having to reflash | the card to IT mode. | | The reason of this request is that the UEFI Bios on the IBM XSeries | 3550M3 refuses

umass(4) regression in 9.0-RC1.

2011-10-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Hi. My SDHC card (via adapter) is no longer being detected after upgrade to 9.0-RC1. The same card with this adapter works on my laptop with older HEAD. usbus0: EHCI version 1.0 usbus0: on ehci0 usbus0: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0

Re: [UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0

2011-10-27 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Erwin Lansing wrote on 27.10.2011 14:21: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that should include: a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10_FIX or similar), b) that only is run from bsd.port.mk when OSVERSION>100 c) runs the l

Re: Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

2011-10-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Tom Evans , 20111027 13:06: >> I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster, >> it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group >> files - if you have added local users you mus

Re: Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

2011-10-27 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 27/10/2011 11:22, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I just finished the upgrade from source from 9.0-BETA2 to RC1, and I find two > problems. > > First, I lost my users; nonroot user names are not recognized, if for > instance I type > > passwd arlene > > I already tried to login as arlene with old pass

Re: Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

2011-10-27 Thread Ed Schouten
* Tom Evans , 20111027 13:06: > I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster, > it will prompt you to install new passwd, master.passwd and group > files - if you have added local users you must not say yes to this, > you must either merge the changes in or kee

Re: Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

2011-10-27 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I just finished the upgrade from source from 9.0-BETA2 to RC1, and I find two > problems. > > First, I lost my users; nonroot user names are not recognized, if for > instance I type > > passwd arlene > > I already tried to login as arlene

Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

2011-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
I just finished the upgrade from source from 9.0-BETA2 to RC1, and I find two problems. First, I lost my users; nonroot user names are not recognized, if for instance I type passwd arlene I already tried to login as arlene with old password, no good. I copied the /etc directory to a backup on

Re: [UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0

2011-10-27 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that > > > > should include: > > > > a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10_FIX or similar), > > > > b) that only is run from bsd.port.mk when OSVERSION>100 > > > > c) runs the late

Re: Should process in STOP state be swapped out?

2011-10-27 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Xin LI w dniu 27 paź 2011, o godz. 02:03: > I've noticed that if I kill -STOP a process, the in-core size does not > change even when there is memory pressure (what I'm expecting is that > if there is memory pressure, the process's in-core part gets swapped > out from time