On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
>>
>> During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
>> keyboard and mouse are working .
>>
>> When a graphical desktop ( Flu
In message <4ea654f6.1060...@yandex.ru>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" writes:
>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>--enig1B092FDF9A756BE78BC74C01
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On 25.10.2011 10:08, Poul-Henning Ka
On 25.10.2011 10:08, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> The way this used to work before gpart, is that boot0cfg would send
> a GEOM ctl-message to the MBR-geom asking "Would you please write this
> boot code ?"
>
> Since the MBR-geom was the "owner" of the whole disk, and the one
> who had it open for wr
In message , Benjamin Kaduk
writes:
>On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> This is stale message. boot0cfg might work without this.
>
>On a *mounted* disk? Surely that qualifies as an "open" for the purposes
>of the check.
The way this used to work before gpart, is that boot0cfg woul
Hi,
Just because I'd like to ensure this doesn't get lost, would you
please do an MBR install of 9.0-RELEASE on another disk, and then plug
that in as a slave to the 8.x install?
Do you have a USB<->SATA adapter, so you can attach the disk after boot?
What I think will help the developers;
* get
Hi all,
I have recently installed 9.0-RC1 on my Thinkpad X201 and have noticed
severe (~20 mins) latency to get to the third stage bootloader
(/boot/loader). This is system triple booted with Windows 7 and Arch
Linux using the GRUB 2 bootmanager. FreeBSD is not on a extended
partition, if it
On 25.10.2011 5:18, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>> to allow writing to the MBR, and restore it to 0 afterwards.
>>
>> This is stale message. boot0cfg might work without this.
>
> On a *mounted* disk? Surely that qualifies as an "open" for the purposes of
> the check.
Yes. boot0cfg uses GEOM_PART' co
23.10.2011 11:12, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
In the mentime, can you please advice how can I use camcontrol in order to
disable APM for my HDD?
@reboot camcontrol idle ada0 -t 300 ; camcontrol idle ada1 -t 300
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
__
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
>>
>> During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
>> keyboard and mouse are working .
>>
>> When a graphical desktop ( Fluxb
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
> On 10/24/11 00:38, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>>> Kernel building fails since today when kernel gets compiled via CLANG:
>>> ---
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 24.10.2011 1:54, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
NOTE
Protection mechanisms in the geom(4) subsystem might prevent boot0cfg
from being able to update the MBR on a mounted disk. Instructions for
temporarily disabling these protection mechanisms can be f
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
keyboard and mouse are working .
When a graphical desktop ( Fluxbox , Gnome , or KDE ) is started , both of
them are becoming frozen .
De
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
>
> GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
>
>v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
>
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
keyboard and mouse are working .
When a graphical desktop ( Fluxbox , Gnome , or KDE ) is started , both of
them are becoming frozen .
De
On 10/24/11 00:38, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
>> Kernel building fails since today when kernel gets compiled via CLANG:
>> --
> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
>> ---
On 10/24/2011 10:14, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/21/2011 22:42, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried following:
>>>
>>> (1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
>>>
>>>return status == 0
>>
>> Return status isn't everything
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
v86.esi = VTOPOFF(params);
Changed this to ¶ms. Also ch
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 05:22:13PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the
> patch at the following URL and let me know how it works.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/dc/dc.uli562x.diff
>
> The patch was generated against lates
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> >>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Alexey Shuvaev
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 18 October 2011 03:00, Alexey Shuvaev
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:14:56PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
>> >> Hello list!
>> >>
>> > Errr... Replying to myself
Hello, list.
I've been trying to install FreeBSD 9.0-beta3 amd64 on a machine with the
following hardware:
Motherboard: MSI K8N Neo2-Platinum
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3000+ (1800 MHz)
RAM: 1 GB (2 x 512 MB) DDR2
Disk: Western Digital Caviar® Green™ 1TB
The story is as follows:
Before you think it; I dis
TB --- 2011-10-24 15:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-24 15:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-24 15:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-24 15:30:57 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-24 15:30:57 - /usr/bin/c
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 22:42, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried following:
>>
>> (1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
>>
>> return status == 0
>
> Return status isn't everything. :)
>
>> prints out "exported"
>
> In my case (1.7)
on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wr
On 24/10/2011 14:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:31:25 pm Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
>> Speaking of that, and in the context of the recursion that svnversion
>> does, something else comes to my mind...
>>
>> svnversion is currently executed in ${SRCDIR}/sys, so the revision
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the C
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
> >> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1"
On Friday, October 21, 2011 5:31:01 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:53:11 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > I
On Friday, October 21, 2011 5:37:16 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> >> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 11:58:28 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:44:45AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:10:38AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > > My suggestion would be that if we won't be able to fix it before 9.0,
> > > we should
On Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:31:25 pm Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> Speaking of that, and in the context of the recursion that svnversion
> does, something else comes to my mind...
>
> svnversion is currently executed in ${SRCDIR}/sys, so the revision
> number is relevant only to the kernel sourc
TB --- 2011-10-24 06:40:27 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-24 06:40:27 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-10-24 06:40:27 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-24 06:40:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-24 06:40:32 - /usr/bin/c
33 matches
Mail list logo
