Hi,
I noticed that the daily security emails don't show failed logins
properly, because the logged string does not match.
This is how the lines are grepped for failed logins:
n=$(catmsgs | egrep -ia "^$yesterday.*: .*(fail|invalid|bad|illegal)" |
tee /dev/stderr | wc -l)
This is ho
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:35:15PM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 10/22/11 19:49, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > The panic message says:
> >
> > panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
> > 3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
> >
> > I only have picture of the backtrace:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Greg Miller wrote:
> On 10/22/11, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
>> cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
>
> New in RC1, with GENERIC:
Was r226041 MFCed properly?
-Garret
On 10/22/11, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
> cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
New in RC1, with GENERIC:
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredunda
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 10/22/11 19:49, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/mis
The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
new branch I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable.
But just so you know most of the developers active in head and stable/9
pay more attentio
On 10/22/11 19:49, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/panic_negative_window.jpg
ewww that
amd64 with
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
SENDMAIL_LDADD+=-lsasl2
in /etc/make.conf "make buildworld" gives:
===> lib/librtld_db (cleandir)
".depend", line 1: Need an operator
".depend", line 3: Need an operator
*skip*
".depend", line
On 22/10/2011 16:21, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
Thanks for reporting the breakage, I'll see if I can get it fixed in
time for 9.0.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
Le Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:51:29 +0200,
Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit :
> On my Soekris net5501 (AMD Geode i586 CPU) clang make buildworld fails
> on an illegal instruction "nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)".
I've found a test program from Roman Divacky to check the CPU as clang
(http://lev.vlakno.cz/~rdiva
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:13:36PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote
> in <4ea23c08.6060...@freebsd.org>:
>
> do> On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> do> > Mattia Rossi wrote
> do> > in <4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au>:
> do> >
> do> > mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care o
On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:
>>> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
$(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>>>
>>> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for j
On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:
>> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>>
>> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
>> svnversion.
>>
>> Anyone else want to propo
Hello,
On my Soekris net5501 (AMD Geode i586 CPU) clang make buildworld fails
on an illegal instruction "nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)".
# make buildworld
...
ranlib libiberty.a
clang -O2 -pipe -I. -DGCCVER=\"4.2\" -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\"
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_too
22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:
> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>
> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
> svnversion.
>
> Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and
> more
On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
svnversion.
Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and
more effective one already exists? :)
--
Noth
On Oct 22, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/10/22 Garrett Cooper :
>>
>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>>
>> is what I use in my installkernel wrapper script. Granted, I didn't know
>> about svnversion some time later, but it appears that svnversion broke some
>> thin
On 22/10/2011 18:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried following:
>>
>> (1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
>>
>> return status == 0
>> prints out "exported"
>>
>> time:
>> real0m0.043s
>> user0m0.000s
>> sys 0m0.045s
Olivier Smedts writes:
>>
>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>>
>> is what I use in my installkernel wrapper script. Granted, I didn't know
>> about svnversion some time later, but it appears that svnversion broke some
>> things by consolidating the .svn directories as Chris shows abo
2011/10/22 Garrett Cooper :
>
> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>
> is what I use in my installkernel wrapper script. Granted, I didn't know
> about svnversion some time later, but it appears that svnversion broke some
> things by consolidating the .svn directories as Chris shows above
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I tried following:
(1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
return status == 0
prints out "exported"
time:
real0m0.043s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.045s
(2) Run svnversion in svn directory:
return status == 0
prints out "22384
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:23:53PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> Why do you not want to use ataidle?
> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ad4
ataidle: error: identify device /dev/ad4
> ls -l /dev | grep ad
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel4 Oct 22 18:1
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/panic_negative_window.jpg
I've see
Why do you not want to use ataidle?
--
Bruce Cran
(ataidle maintainer)
On 22 Oct 2011, at 11:36, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
> Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
> on laptops?
>
>> camcontrol cmd ada0 -a "EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00" -v
> camcon
Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
on laptops?
> camcontrol cmd ada0 -a "EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00" -v
camcontrol: error sending command
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): SETFEATURES. ACB: ef 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): CAM stat
Hello people!
I have:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (1994.48-MHz K8-class CPU)
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226607 amd64
For example during the building of the port lang/gcc46 in four streams (-j 4)
with a heavy load on the processor - use the system was nearly impossible -
resp
The panic message says:
panic: tcp_input negative window: tp 0xfe007763e000 rcv_nxt
3718269252 rcv_adv 3718268291
I only have picture of the backtrace:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/panic_negative_window.jpg
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.whe
Doug Barton wrote
in <4ea23c08.6060...@freebsd.org>:
do> On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
do> > Mattia Rossi wrote
do> > in <4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au>:
do> >
do> > mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing "inet6" to ifconfig
do> > mr> automatically?
do> >
do> > No. You
28 matches
Mail list logo
