On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 01:35:14AM +, Nali Toja wrote:
> Ali Mashtizadeh writes:
> > 2011/8/31 Alexey Dokuchaev :
> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:59:48PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> >>> 2011/8/29 ken :
> >>> > Could I test your patch for nvidia-driver, too?
> >>> > I cannot find your patch
Hi Folks,
Sorry if this is unrelated but in 9.0-BETA3 about:plugins in chromium
and firefox both show both flash and acrobat plugins, but I see these
NSPlugin Wrapper errors in the console when I start the browser from
the command line.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/11/11 12:57 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Julian Elischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I will repeat myself here, but I ran what-
On 10/11/11 12:57 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
libprocstat is _itself_ a problem:
% git grep 'define _KERNEL' .
[...]
lib/libprocstat/cd9660.c:#define _KERNEL
lib/libprocstat/nwfs.c:#d
After r216641 sbcl built with sb-thread dies on mailbox tests. It also
dies when I try to complete a symbol in slime. The workaround seems to
be to revert libthr to r216640.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154050
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216641
http://www.freshp
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
>> 10-current kernel complains the following way:
>>
>> ipmi0: at iomem 0-0x1 on isa0
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
> 10-current kernel complains the following way:
>
> ipmi0: at iomem 0-0x1 on isa0
> ipmi0: KCS mode found at mem 0x0 alignment 0x1 on isa
> ipmi0: could
Hi folks,
I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
10-current kernel complains the following way:
ipmi0: at iomem 0-0x1 on isa0
ipmi0: KCS mode found at mem 0x0 alignment 0x1 on isa
ipmi0: couldn't configure I/O resource
device_attach: ipmi0 attach returned 6
Now, 6 i
Am 11.10.2011 15:31, schrieb Larry Rosenman:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
>>> Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
>>> with the
On Saturday, October 08, 2011 5:29:12 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my configuration, If I boot 9.0-BETA3 (r225759) without ACPI, the
> kernel encounter a page fault before the end of the boot.
>
> A photo of the screen can be found at:
>
> http://verbier.restart.be/xfer/dsc00042.jp
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling w
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> [...]
>> libprocstat is _itself_ a problem:
>>
>> % git grep 'define _KERNEL' .
>> [...]
>> lib/libprocstat/cd9660.c:#define _KERNEL
>> lib/libprocstat/nwfs.c:#define _KERNEL
>> lib/libpr
On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM, René Ladan wrote:
2011/10/11 Garrett Cooper:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
I didn't say bug
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 1:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry A
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM, René Ladan wrote:
> 2011/10/11 Garrett Cooper :
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
>>>
On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
>
> I didn't say bug for bug, just not gen
Doug Barton writes:
> http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
[...]
> +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 100 && !defined(NO_AUTOTOOLS_FIX)
Being not limited to GNU_CONFIGURE, is it a feature?
Also, there are a few ports that either set WRKSRC instead of
BUILD_WRKSRC or extract several distfiles. Why not use WRKDI
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>
>>> I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
>>> Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> ...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it
2011/10/11 Garrett Cooper :
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
I didn't say bug for bug, just not generate stupid errors like the ffs
>>>
>>> one.
--
S
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't say bug for bug, just not generate stupid errors like the ffs
>>
>> one.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
I install 9.0-BETA3 i386, set next rc.conf configurations:
mail# grep -E "hostname|ifconfig" /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_em0="inet 91.227.17.15 netmask 255.255.255.0"
hostname="mail.AeroStarContract.ru"
mail#
after reboot with plugged LAN cable, I have this strange network
configuration:
lo0: flags=
On 10/11/2011 1:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andricwrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lso
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with c
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> ...
>>>
>>> I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it build on
>>> 10.0-CURRENT (this was easy to fix here, as lsof uses it
On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with t
Hello, Christer.
You wrote 11 октября 2011 г., 11:52:00:
> I'm not sure how Subversion 1.6.x is about this, but in 1.7 you can
> just drop sqlite.c from sqlite-source over to Subversion's
> sqlite-amalgamation/ directory.
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/INSTALL
I don't want to
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>> I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
>> Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
>> with the system headers.
>>
>> Is there a
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
I didn't say bug for bug, just not generate stupid errors like the ffs
one.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Larr
On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> We will NOT support clang as the compiler for lsof unless the system headers
> work the same way as gcc's do.
That apparently means you won't support clang then, because it's not intended
to be (or ever going to be) fully bug-for-bug "compatib
On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, "Larry Rosenman" wrote:
>
> I didn't say bug for bug, just not generate stupid errors like the ffs
one.
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > We will NO
Hi ,
* poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp , 20111011 14:20:
> It looks stored accounting information is correct, but lastcomm failed
> to represent device name gently after it has been destroyed.
Yes, exactly. Our struct acct uses a dev_t to store the controlling TTY.
This is obviously comp
I didn't say bug for bug, just not generate stupid errors like the ffs one.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> We will NOT support clang as the compiler for lsof unless the system headers
Hi!
There is an open pr on this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/93629
2011/10/11 Dimitry Andric :
> On 2011-10-11 11:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> On my lab's server, a FreeBSD 9 box (9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #40
>> r226245: Tue Oct 11 10:01:29 CEST 2011), I receive for so
Hi,
Does anyone see this on -CURRENT (and stable/9)? It doesn't look so
smart output to me. I was aware of this issue first back in Aug 2009.
==
$ tty; lastcomm tty|head -1
/dev/pts/12
tty - user pts/120.002 secs Tue Oct 11
20:41
==
OK, As this was run on pts
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:51 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also make
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 8:51 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> ...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it build on
10.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christer Solskogen wrote:
2011/10/6 Lev Serebryakov :
Huh? It is something new for me (maintainer). What is "recommended"
method?
I'm not sure how Subversion 1.6.x is about this, but in 1.7 you can
just drop sqlite.c from sqlite-source over to Subversion's
sqlite-amalga
On 10/11/2011 8:51 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it build on
10.0-CURRENT (this was easy to fix here, as lsof uses its own
hand-rolled configuration scr
On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it build on
10.0-CURRENT (this was easy to fix here, as lsof uses its own
hand-rolled configuration script). Let me know if it works for you.
Unle
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is there a project afoot to update the syst
Has this issue been resolved somehow? Sane method to build gptzfsboot
that will run on HP's P410i?
Daniel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-c
On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/10/3 Paul Mather :
>> I know ZFS does not have a fsck utility ("because it doesn't need one":),
>> but does anyone know of any way of fixing this corruption short of
>> destroying the pool, creating a new one, and restoring from backup?
On 2011-10-11 11:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
On my lab's server, a FreeBSD 9 box (9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #40
r226245: Tue Oct 11 10:01:29 CEST 2011), I receive for some ports while
compiling this error:
Abort trap (core dumped)
Assertion failed: (mblength != (size_t)-1&& mblength != (size_t)-2)
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is there a project afoot to update the system headers to make them clang
compilable?
T
On Oct 11, 2011 5:07 PM, "Erwin Lansing" wrote:
>
> Since the release has been pushed back some more since the last mail, we
> do have some time to test a possible fix for the issues we're seeing
> with libtool on FreeBSD 10.0.
[snip]
> to move forward. Other options include the big find/grep/a
Since yesterday after a make world on both FreeBSD versions I realize a
strange behaviour in several GTK clients (gq for instance, freshly
installed yesterday) and Firefox and Thunderbird (they have not been
recompiled now for days).
This behaviour occured earlier this year on FreeBSD 9.0-CURR
On my lab's server, a FreeBSD 9 box (9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #40
r226245: Tue Oct 11 10:01:29 CEST 2011), I receive for some ports while
compiling this error:
Abort trap (core dumped)
Assertion failed: (mblength != (size_t)-1 && mblength != (size_t)-2),
function inittables_mb, file
/usr/s
2011/10/6 Lev Serebryakov :
> Huh? It is something new for me (maintainer). What is "recommended"
> method?
I'm not sure how Subversion 1.6.x is about this, but in 1.7 you can
just drop sqlite.c from sqlite-source over to Subversion's
sqlite-amalgamation/ directory.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/a
48 matches
Mail list logo
