--- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long wrote:
...
> >
> > We do not have f2c in tree and it was disconnected
> from the build even
> > longer than that.
> >
>
> Guess I was looking on an old system, sorry for the noise.
>
> Scott
>
Ugh.. pointyhat is all mine please...
It's still linked in the
Greetings,
the following patch is required to let man(1) continue to work if the
user build WITHOUT_GROFF and has textproc/groff installed. I personally
think relying on a sane $PATH while calling groff and co is ok to do.
If there are good reasons against this, please speak your mind. The idea
i
On 2011-04-18 16:34, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
...
Please review the attached patch, which cleans up the ICC bits.
You probably also want to remove the code that uses __INTEL_COMPILER
in source tree if you want to be really thorough.
Ok, new patch attached. Some of the contributed sources also
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:43:56AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> I don't seem to have a hw.acpi.thermal sysctl node on my box. Can
> someone please try this patch?
Well, no magic smoke leaked out when I tried it, and:
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #203 r220770M: Mon Apr 18 09:51:15 PDT 2011
d13
On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
> "Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote:
>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long wrote:
>> ...
Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use.
IMHO, you can axe libf2c too...
>>>
>>> Honest questi
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote:
>> FreeBSD was successfully upgraded.
>>
>> uname -v
>> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011
>> root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>>
>> Everything seems to be workin
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
"Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote:
>
> --- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long wrote:
> ...
> > > Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use.
> > >
> > > IMHO, you can axe libf2c too...
> > >
> >
> > Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c
> > that lives
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote:
>> FreeBSD was successfully upgraded.
>>
>> uname -v
>> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011
>> root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>>
>> Everything seems to be workin
--- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long wrote:
...
> > Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use.
> >
> > IMHO, you can axe libf2c too...
> >
>
> Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c
> that lives in ports and is adopted by people who use
> fortran? The one that I find in the base sy
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:42:49 +0200
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Reviving an old thread(*), I would like to propose to finally remove
> the Intel C Compiler support from share/mk and other places. As
> mentioned in that thread, the ICC bits simply do not work anymore,
> and no one has volunteered to f
Reviving an old thread(*), I would like to propose to finally remove the
Intel C Compiler support from share/mk and other places. As mentioned
in that thread, the ICC bits simply do not work anymore, and no one has
volunteered to fix it for many years.
Please review the attached patch, which cle
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:05:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> ...
> > output from:
> > sysctl -a |grep acpi
> > is here: https://privatepaste.com/ca08d4658b
>
> I suspect it is still there, but sysctl doesn't know how to display it
> anymore. This is probably due to the changes with formattin
On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote:
> FreeBSD was successfully upgraded.
>
> uname -v
> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011
> root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>
> Everything seems to be working well except
> `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disap
On Sunday 17 April 2011 20:43:15 Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Out of curiousity - is currently someone working on ukbd?
>
No.
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubsc
14 matches
Mail list logo
