Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-17 Thread Scott Long
On Apr 17, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. > > IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... > Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c that lives in ports and is adopted by people who use fortran? The one that I find in the base system

ukbs

2011-04-17 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Hi! Out of curiousity - is currently someone working on ukbd? Armin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-17 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... cheers, Pedro. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-17 Thread Nick Ulen
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 05:33:00PM +0200, Romain Garbage wrote: > 2011/4/16 Nick Ulen : > > FreeBSD was successfully upgraded. > > > > uname -v > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011 > > root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > > > Everything seems to be working well except > >

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-17 Thread Romain Garbage
2011/4/16 Nick Ulen : > FreeBSD was successfully upgraded. > > uname -v > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011 > root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > Everything seems to be working well except > `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared from the list of available > sysctl

HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-17 Thread Dimitry Andric
I will be removing libobjc and other Objective-C related components from the base system, as these are extremely outdated, and not used by anything in the base system. The previous thread about this (*) did not generate much discussion, but if there are any objections, please speak up. *) http: