Re: NFSv4 and pam_mount - mounting user home directories.

2011-01-08 Thread Rick Macklem
> Hi, > > 1. I have a NFSv4-enabled server with /etc/exports like: > V4: / -sec=sys > /home/stud -sec=sys > > /etc/rc.conf: > > nfs_server_enable=YES > nfsv4_server_enable=YES > nfsuserd_enable=YES > > Is it possible to run ONLY NFSv4 server (without NFSv3 compatibility) > ? You can limit the

Re: FYI: clang static analyzer page has moved to http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/

2011-01-08 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > *But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some > > > possible remedies:

Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17

2011-01-08 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Hello Pav, > > Den 08/01/2011 kl. 20.34 skrev Pav Lucistnik: > >> Package cluster is quite clever, akshully, and since this is OT here, >> just terse comments > > Sorry, replied to a bad message... redirecting to current@ > 1. adding S

Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17

2011-01-08 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Hello Pav, Den 08/01/2011 kl. 20.34 skrev Pav Lucistnik: > Package cluster is quite clever, akshully, and since this is OT here, > just terse comments Sorry, replied to a bad message... redirecting to current@ >>> 1. adding SSD disks > > irrelevant because of bullet 2. > >>> 2. source and des

Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8

2011-01-08 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: Also, are there any restrictions with jail? If we're in a jail and can't find an address, do we really want to allow _any_ address set with an MC option? I've never used jails, but was just wondering if the application could somehow use an interface ad

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Playstation 3 support now in HEAD

2011-01-08 Thread Sevan / Venture37
Well done Nathan, very cool! :) any chance you could post the dmesg output to the list Sevan / Venture37 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cur

Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8

2011-01-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_ bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP checksums. This use to work and was broke sometime between the middle of October and late Decembe

Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17

2011-01-08 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-01-08 01:54, Anonymous wrote: Looks like lang/sbcl doesn't like new ld(1), here on amd64. Same error when building using devel/binutils. Can you reproduce? ... //doing warm init - compilation phase This is SBCL 1.0.43, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information abo

Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8

2011-01-08 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_ bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP checksums. This use to work and was broke sometime between the middle of October and late December as far as I can tell. My very best guess

Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8

2011-01-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_ bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP checksums.

Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17

2011-01-08 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-01-07 22:54, Ade Lovett wrote: Most likely it's low priority given all the other exp-runs that affect 7.x/8.x, tweaking things for an 6.x-EOL-tagged tree, and a bunch of other infrastructure stuff. Not to mention the impending 7- and 8- RELEASEs. I understand, and there will probably a