Re: two ata write chaching request

Xin LI wrote: > On 12/20/10 15:10, Alexander Best wrote: >> i'd really like to see > >> 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds >>(i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and > > This is possible. We may need to split the logic out from ad_init() as > the disk number is not known at that poin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2010-12-20 23:44:06 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 23:44:06 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-12-20 23:44:06 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:44:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:44:09 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 23:15:05 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: two ata write chaching request

On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> NetBSD's dkctl allows one to enable and disable read or write caches on a >> per-device basis, on the fly. Presumably atacontrol or whatever the new ada >> / ACHI driver uses for control would be the FreeBSD equivalent > >atacontrol

Re: two ata write chaching request

On Mon Dec 20 10, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds > > (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and > > 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. > > NetBSD's dkctl allows one to enable and disab

Re: two ata write chaching request

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >> 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds >>   (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and >> 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. > > NetBSD's dkctl allows one to enab

Re: two ata write chaching request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/20/10 15:10, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i'd really like to see > > 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds >(i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and This is possible. We may need to split the logic out from ad_init() as th

Re: two ata write chaching request

On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds > (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and > 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. NetBSD's dkctl allows one to enable and disable read or write caches on a per-device basis, on

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:35 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:35 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:35 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:38 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:38 - /usr

two ata write chaching request

hi there, i'd really like to see 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. any thoughts on these two topics? is it technically possible? cheers. alex -- a13x __

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

TB --- 2010-12-20 22:37:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 22:37:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-12-20 22:37:22 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:37:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:37:25 - /usr/b

Re: dev/psm0 not found

В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:15 -0500 John Baldwin пишет: > On Monday, December 20, 2010 4:38:57 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:02:46 -0500 > > John Baldwin пишет: > > > > Not working :( > > This was debugging, not a fix. Try this possible fix: > > Index: atkbdc_isa.c > ==

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2010-12-20 22:16:38 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 22:16:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-12-20 22:16:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:16:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:16:41 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:58 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:58 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-12-20 22:10:58 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:11:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:11:02 - /u

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, December 20, 2010 4:38:57 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > ?? Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:02:46 -0500 > > John Baldwin ??: > > > > Not working :( > > This was debugging, not a fix. Try this possible fix: > > Index: atkbdc_is

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2010-12-20 22:07:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 22:07:24 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-12-20 22:07:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:07:27 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 22:07:27 - /usr/bin/c

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Monday, December 20, 2010 4:38:57 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:02:46 -0500 > John Baldwin пишет: > > Not working :( This was debugging, not a fix. Try this possible fix: Index: atkbdc_isa.c === --- atkbdc_isa

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:21 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:18 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:18 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:20 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2010-12-20 21:28:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 21:28:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-12-20 21:28:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:28:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:28:55 - /usr/bin/c

Re: dev/psm0 not found

В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:02:46 -0500 John Baldwin пишет: > On Monday, December 20, 2010 3:03:36 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:51:15 -0500 > > John Baldwin пишет: > > > > > On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:14:35 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:49:53 -0500 > >

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 21:00:08 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Monday, December 20, 2010 3:03:36 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:51:15 -0500 > John Baldwin пишет: > > > On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:14:35 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:49:53 -0500 > > > John Baldwin пишет: > > > > > > > On Monday, December 20, 2010

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

TB --- 2010-12-20 20:26:52 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 20:26:52 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-12-20 20:26:52 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 20:27:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 20:27:00 - /usr/b

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2010-12-20 20:06:30 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 20:06:30 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-12-20 20:06:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 20:06:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 20:06:41 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2010-12-20 19:31:30 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 19:31:30 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-12-20 19:31:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:31:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:31:41 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2010-12-20 19:51:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 19:51:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-12-20 19:51:26 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:51:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:51:40 - /u

Re: dev/psm0 not found

В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:51:15 -0500 John Baldwin пишет: > On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:14:35 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:49:53 -0500 > > John Baldwin пишет: > > > > > On Monday, December 20, 2010 11:53:34 am Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:58:57 -0500 >

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:14:35 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:49:53 -0500 > John Baldwin пишет: > > > On Monday, December 20, 2010 11:53:34 am Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:58:57 -0500 > > > John Baldwin пишет: > > > > > > > On Saturday, December 18, 20

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2010-12-20 19:00:36 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 19:00:36 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-12-20 19:00:36 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:00:44 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 19:00:44 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2010-12-20 18:22:10 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-12-20 18:22:10 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-12-20 18:22:10 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-12-20 18:22:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-12-20 18:22:21 - /usr/bin/c

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Monday, December 20, 2010 11:53:34 am Ivan Klymenko wrote: > В Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:58:57 -0500 > John Baldwin пишет: > > > On Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:30:20 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/dev/atkbdc/psm.c?view=log > > > > > > after updating svn

Re: dev/psm0 not found

On Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:30:20 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote: > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/dev/atkbdc/psm.c?view=log > > after updating svn revision => 216491 system is not detecting the device > psm > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=216491 Can you plea

[dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.

on 14/12/2010 05:10 Artem Belevich said the following: > I've posted updated version of the patch here: > https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace.patch.gz > > This patch uses DTrace module field to specify syscall's compat > variant in the syscall probe name. If there are no ob