Discussion about upgrading BIND in RELENG_7

2010-12-17 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 For those interested in the topic I have opened a discussion about the idea of upgrading BIND in RELENG_7 on freebsd-stable. You can find the post here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-December/060640.html If you have anything

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Warner Losh
On 12/17/2010 14:59, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:48 AM, b. f. wrote: On 12/17/10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: Alexander Best wrote: ... The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in r212525 as part of his tbemd project

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/15/2010 23:19, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not upgrad

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-17 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek : > Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before > v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot > support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can > import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:48 AM, b. f. wrote: > On 12/17/10, Alexander Best wrote: >> On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: >>> Alexander Best wrote: > > ... > >>> The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in >>> r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge.  It's possible that t

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread b. f.
On 12/17/10, Alexander Best wrote: > On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: >> Alexander Best wrote: ... >> The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in >> r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this >> change may have been an unintended, but it followed

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Dec 17 10, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > [...] > > >>I'm glad to see that you're filling in some of the many missing bits > >>in this file. > > > >yet another addition. > > > >cheers. > >alex > > > > .if ${MK_TCSH} == no > > And what about usr/share/skel/dot.cshrc?

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Alexander Best wrote: [...] I'm glad to see that you're filling in some of the many missing bits in this file. yet another addition. cheers. alex > > .if ${MK_TCSH} == no And what about usr/share/skel/dot.cshrc? Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-curr

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > >any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when > >WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get > >installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related > >executa

Re: idle priority > 30 in top(1) and idprio > 31

2010-12-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, December 17, 2010 12:16:49 am Anonymous wrote: > Is the following a regression? > > $ uname -vm > FreeBSD 9.0-HEAD-20101216-JPSNAP #0: Thu Dec 16 07:13:24 UTC 2010 > r...@build-amd64-fbsd.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > $ yes >/dev/null & > $ idprio 31 -$(p

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 + > "b. f." wrote: > > > The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in > > r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this > > change may have been an unintended, but it followed a

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > >any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when > >WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get > >installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related > >executa

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-17 Thread Ivan Voras
On 17/12/2010 08:56, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wrote: By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads. Run blogbench and bonnie++ at the same time, possibly with tarring and untarring /usr/ports. _

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-17 Thread Речистов Григорий
I got more stacktraces in course of compilation of bash, see the updated dmesg. By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads. On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:54:36 +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wr

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-17 Thread Речистов Григ орий
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:29:14 +0300, Olivier Smedts wrote: 2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) : I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made:

[Call for testers] DT_FILTER implementation

2010-12-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
Hello, I implemented DT_FILTER and DT_FILTER_AUX support for our rtld, following the documentation at http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-0690/chapter4-4?l=en&a=view Another interesting text is http://cygwin.ru/ml/libc-hacker/2001-05/msg00040.html The support for filtering is required for possibl