Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread Randy Bush
> Please try r215027. worked!!! thank you. randy ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Only display ACPI bootmenu key if ACPI is present

2010-11-08 Thread Lars Engels
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:14:53PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > This patch changes the Forth code for the Beastie menu to only display the > menu option to enable or disable ACPI if the loader detects ACPI. This avoids > displaying a menu item prompting to enable ACPI if the BIOS doesn't actually

Syscons and termcap

2010-11-08 Thread Eir Nym
I've compiled -CURRENT kernel with UTF-8 and CONS25 support. ( r214751 ) in xterm emulation mode I have problems with bindings for some keys, such as Home If I start vis(1) and press Home, I always get "^[[H" sequence instead of "^[OH" which is defined in termcap (5) file. I get correct results a

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-09 02:02:31 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-09 02:02:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-09 02:02:31 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-09 02:02:44 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-09 02:02:44 - /usr/b

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:52:23AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > Can you verify this is a 64-bit platform? > > i can verify that this is am64 Ok, that explains why I could not reproduce this under i386. Please try r215027. -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) ___

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-09 01:55:06 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-09 01:55:06 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-09 01:55:06 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-09 01:55:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-09 01:55:14 - /usr

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread Randy Bush
> Can you verify this is a 64-bit platform? i can verify that this is am64 randy ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:28:27AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > >> ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all) > >> c++ -O2 -pipe > >> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn > >> -

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Tinderbox agrees :(... TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB

Re: Only display ACPI bootmenu key if ACPI is present

2010-11-08 Thread Kevin Lo
John Baldwin wrote: > This patch changes the Forth code for the Beastie menu to only display the > menu option to enable or disable ACPI if the loader detects ACPI. This avoids > displaying a menu item prompting to enable ACPI if the BIOS doesn't actually > include ACPI. Any objections? I have n

Re: kgdb and .ko files

2010-11-08 Thread Julian Elischer
relying to self with more info.. On 11/8/10 4:34 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: my usual command set for doing .ko debugging issomething like: %kgdb /sys/amd64/compile/DEBUG/kernel.symbols (kgdb) target remote pu_serial2:7005 (kgdb) sharedlibrary driver.ko (kgdb) directory /home/me/branches/blah/obj

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-09 00:09:56 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-09 00:09:56 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-11-09 00:09:56 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-09 00:10:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-09 00:10:05 - /usr/bin/c

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: >>> ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all) >>> c++ -O2 -pipe >>> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn >>> -I. -DHAVE_CONF

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - /usr/bin

Error: stack overflow on boot

2010-11-08 Thread Etienne Robillard
Hi, why is this message happening with 8.1 and sometimes CURRENT ? I tried recompiling the bootloader but the error still happens, forcing user to hit Enter to enter manual boot. Any takes ? :) Many thanks, Etienne ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mai

kgdb and .ko files

2010-11-08 Thread Julian Elischer
my usual command set for doing .ko debugging issomething like: %kgdb /sys/amd64/compile/DEBUG/kernel.symbols (kgdb) target remote pu_serial2:7005 (kgdb) sharedlibrary driver.ko (kgdb) directory /home/me/branches/blah/obj/ (kgdb) info sharedlibrary FromTo Syms Rea

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread Randy Bush
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: >> ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all) >> c++ -O2 -pipe >> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn >> -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H >> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/..

Only display ACPI bootmenu key if ACPI is present

2010-11-08 Thread John Baldwin
This patch changes the Forth code for the Beastie menu to only display the menu option to enable or disable ACPI if the loader detects ACPI. This avoids displaying a menu item prompting to enable ACPI if the BIOS doesn't actually include ACPI. Any objections? --- //depot/projects/smpng/sys/boot/

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, November 08, 2010 11:46:58 am Matthew Fleming wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Monday, November 08, 2010 10:34:33 am Matthew Fleming wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wr

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all) > c++ -O2 -pipe > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn > -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../

Re: groff build failure

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > very current amd64 > ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all) > c++ -O2 -pipe > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn > -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/

Re: Files under src/ not used for building world

2010-11-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:42:27PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > > Hey folks, not sure why, but I had a stab at looking which files were > > actually read during building world. [..] > > usr.bin/cpio/test/* ? ? # move to tools/regression?

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, November 08, 2010 11:46:58 am Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, November 08, 2010 10:34:33 am Matthew Fleming wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matth

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-08 Thread Alexander Motin
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Your patch to libscg looks definitely OK if we only look at the new >>> corrected >>> kernel driver behavior. >>> >>> There is a problem: >>> >>> In case that there is a sense data residual > 0, libscg will asume that >>> there >>> is less sen

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Motin wrote: > > Your patch to libscg looks definitely OK if we only look at the new > > corrected > > kernel driver behavior. > > > > There is a problem: > > > > In case that there is a sense data residual > 0, libscg will asume that > > there > > is less sense data that really pr

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-08 Thread Alexander Motin
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Marius Strobl wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown >>> combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself. >>> Several small patches allow us to

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Monday, November 08, 2010 10:34:33 am Matthew Fleming wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matthew Fleming

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, November 08, 2010 10:34:33 am Matthew Fleming wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matthew Fleming wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hans Petter Sela

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Marius Strobl wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown > > combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself. > > Several small patches allow us to pass most o

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, November 08, 2010 10:34:33 am Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matthew Fleming wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Saturday 06

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matthew Fleming wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Saturday 06 November 2010 14:57:50 Matthew Fleming wrote: >> >> >> >> I think you're misunders

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:33:17 pm Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Saturday 06 November 2010 14:57:50 Matthew Fleming wrote: > >> > >> I think you're misunderstanding the existing taskqueue(9) implementation. > >> > >> A

Re: another fuse panic

2010-11-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, November 08, 2010 6:35:55 am Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/08/10 10:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > JFYI. > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > Can you find any set of circumstances which make this repeatable? > > This panic apparently goes like this: > > 1) used by devf

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 04:28:54PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/11/2010 16:22 Nathan Whitehorn said the following: > > > > The other issue is that this can be a legal thing to do. If you have taken > > care to > > wire the userland buffers ahead of time, there is no problem copying > > copy

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 11/08/10 07:16, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:06:01PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 16:22 Nathan Whitehorn said the following: > > The other issue is that this can be a legal thing to do. If you have taken > care to > wire the userland buffers ahead of time, there is no problem copying > copyin()/copyout() with sleepable locks held. The sysctl code does this. As >

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:06:01PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepabl

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 12:23:08 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 12:23:08 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-08 12:23:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 12:23:28 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 12:23:28 - /usr/b

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: >>> exclusive sleep mutex drmdev (drmdev) r = 0 (0xf

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 11:43:41 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 11:43:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-08 11:43:41 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:44:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:44:03 - /usr

Re: breaking the crunchgen logic into a share/mk file

2010-11-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, I plan on committing this later on this week if there are no objections. I don't plan on back-porting it to RELENG_8. Others are more than welcome to. Thanks, Adrian On 5 October 2010 10:36, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > I've broken out the crunchgen logic from src/rescue/rescue int

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 11:52:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 11:52:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-08 11:52:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:52:36 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:52:36 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 11:44:52 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 11:44:52 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-08 11:44:52 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:45:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:45:25 - /u

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> > >>> I use FreeSBD head and KDE 4 with all the b

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 11:38:37 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 11:38:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-11-08 11:38:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:38:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 11:38:51 - /usr/bin/c

Re: another fuse panic

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 13:55 Andriy Gapon said the following: > I reliable got this panic when all I was doing is saving an attachment in > thunderbird 3 that ran in KDE 4 environment. Not sure what was going on > behind > the scenes, but shouldn't have been anything out of the ordinary. Perhaps this is

powerd vs network throughput

2010-11-08 Thread Bartosz Stec
Hello. I'm using r214746 FreeBSD system as a home fileserver/router, with athlon xp mobile onboard: CPU: mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ (1800.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x681 Family = 6 Model = 8 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff AMD Featu

Re: re(4) driver dropping packets when reading NFS files

2010-11-08 Thread Rick Macklem
> > By chance, how about disabling RX early interrupt? > You can add the following 3 lines of code into re_init_locked(). > > 2710 /* > 2711 * Set the initial RX configuration. > 2712 */ > 2713 re_set_rxmode(sc); > 2714 > 2715 /* Disable RX early interrupt. */ > 2716 cfg = CSR_READ_2(sc, RL_MULTI

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> >>> I use FreeSBD head and KDE 4 with all the bells and whistles enabled. >>> Apparently recent KDE update has enabled

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > > > I use FreeSBD head and KDE 4 with all the bells and whistles enabled. > > Apparently recent KDE update has enabled even more of them, because I > > started to > > have pani

Re: another fuse panic

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 13:35 Ivan Voras said the following: > On 11/08/10 10:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> JFYI. >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > Can you find any set of circumstances which make this repeatable? > > This panic apparently goes like this: > > 1) used by devfs_open(): >

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 10:52:29 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 10:52:29 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-11-08 10:52:29 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:52:56 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:52:56 - /usr/bin/c

Re: radeon_cp_texture: page fault with non-sleepable locks held

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I use FreeSBD head and KDE 4 with all the bells and whistles enabled. > Apparently recent KDE update has enabled even more of them, because I started > to > have panics with a kernel that has INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled. I tried to solv

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:53 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:53 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:33 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:33 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:31 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:31 - /usr/bin/c

Re: another fuse panic

2010-11-08 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/08/10 10:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > JFYI. > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Can you find any set of circumstances which make this repeatable? This panic apparently goes like this: 1) used by devfs_open(): 47 static struct cdevsw fuse_cdevsw = { 48 .d_open = fused

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-08 10:10:20 - /usr/bin/csu

another fuse panic

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
JFYI. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor write data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0x80372a64 stack pointer = 0x28:0xff81265486f0 frame pointer =

Re: Tricky subversion import, what to do?

2010-11-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:53:29 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hello, > > this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code > changes, but that's not the point. The wiki is of no help for this > particular case. > > We have no exclusive vendor branch for unifdef, instead it has been