Clang now builds world and kernel, on i386 and amd64

2010-09-21 Thread Dimitry Andric
Hi, As of r212979, you should now be able to build world and kernel on i386 and amd64 with clang, without any additional patches! To do so, make sure you have updated your installed world to at least r212904 (which has the most recently imported clang/llvm snapshot), and put the following in /et

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 06:04:49 PseudoCylon wrote: > - Original Message > > > From: Adrian Chadd > > To: PseudoCylon > > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 7:04:37 AM > > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > > > On 21 September 2010 11:5

Rollout plan for new version of man/manpath/whatis/apropos

2010-09-21 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I'm to the point where I'm ready to the commit the code, but I wanted to layout a plan for the conversion and ask for input to make sure I didn't miss anything. 1. Commit the code located at http://people.freebsd.org/~gordon/man.shar into src/usr.bin/man (pending mentor review). 2. Unhook src/gnu/

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Adrian Chadd > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 7:04:37 AM > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > On 21 September 2010 11:58, PseudoCylon wrote: > > > Just in case anyone wonders, I've added 11n suppo

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-09-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-09-21 14:20:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-09-21 14:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-09-21 14:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-09-21 14:20:45 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-09-21 14:20:45 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 21 September 2010 21:19, John Baldwin wrote: >> I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an >> AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work >> at the present time because the device names would clash. > > Why would the device names clash?  We have _lo

Re: Document EVFILT_FS and VQ_*

2010-09-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2010/9/21 John Baldwin : > On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:22:24 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For a projects I needed to use EVFILT_FS and saw that it hasn't been >> documented >> so here is a patch to document it http://planet.etoilebsd.net/kqueue.2.diff >> >> It is based on the com

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, September 20, 2010 10:06:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. > > I've not idea right now whether ther

Re: Document EVFILT_FS and VQ_*

2010-09-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:22:24 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > For a projects I needed to use EVFILT_FS and saw that it hasn't been > documented > so here is a patch to document it http://planet.etoilebsd.net/kqueue.2.diff > > It is based on the commit message for the implementati

Re: Port won't build because of installed conflict

2010-09-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:37:29PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote: > On 20:59, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > >Hi > > > >[mini] /usr/ports/www/firefox # make > > > try > make DISABLE_CONFLICTS=YES > > or use ports-mgmt/portmaster > portmaster -o www/firefox firefox-3.5.13,1 This one alone will n

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 21 September 2010 11:58, PseudoCylon wrote: > Just in case anyone wonders, I've added 11n support to run(4) (USB NIC). > http://gitorious.org/run/run/trees/11n_beta2 > > It still has some issues, > * doesn't work well with atheros chips > * HT + AP + bridge = Tx may stall (seems OK with nat) >

Document EVFILT_FS and VQ_*

2010-09-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, For a projects I needed to use EVFILT_FS and saw that it hasn't been documented so here is a patch to document it http://planet.etoilebsd.net/kqueue.2.diff It is based on the commit message for the implementation of EVFILT_FS, sorry I don't know how to better document it (http://lists.freebsd

Re: Port won't build because of installed conflict

2010-09-21 Thread Angelo Turetta
On 20:59, Ian FREISLICH wrote: Hi [mini] /usr/ports/www/firefox # make try make DISABLE_CONFLICTS=YES or use ports-mgmt/portmaster portmaster -o www/firefox firefox-3.5.13,1 Ciao, Angelo. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: Port won't build because of installed conflict

2010-09-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Hi > > [mini] /usr/ports/www/firefox # make > > ===> firefox-3.6.10,1 conflicts with installed package(s): > firefox-3.5.13,1 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delet

Re: One-shot timer broken on Xen

2010-09-21 Thread Alexander Motin
Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:42:45 +0300 > Alexander Motin wrote: >> Bruce Cran wrote: >>> I built a new kernel from HEAD on my Xen domU today and found that >>> it hung after the following messages: >>> >>> smist0: on cpu0 >>> device_attach: smist0 attach returned 6 >>> Device conf

Port won't build because of installed conflict

2010-09-21 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Hi [mini] /usr/ports/www/firefox # make ===> firefox-3.6.10,1 conflicts with installed package(s): firefox-3.5.13,1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 But I d