Xorg build error on -current-amd64

2010-06-02 Thread David Rhodus
===>Verifying install for sessreg in /usr/ports/x11/sessreg ===> Building for sessreg-1.0.5 make all-am cc -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wformat=2 -Wold-style-definiti

Re: Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting

2010-06-02 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Craig Rodrigues wrote: The Berkeley amd is the next big NFS mount client which needs to be updated to use nmount().but that code is messy. :) I know, slightly off topic, but since this reminded me... I've heard good things about the OpenSolaris autofs (I believe Mac

bridge & dhcp

2010-06-02 Thread Andrew Thompson
Hi, > r179003 | brooks | 2008-05-15 13:06:10 +1200 (Thu, 15 May 2008) | 9 lines > >Change the default value of synchronous_dhclient to NO. > >To preserve the existing behavior of etc/rc.d/netif, add code to wait >up to if_up_delay seconds (30 seconds by default) for a default route to >be configur

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Gerd Truschinski wrote: >> Erik Cederstrand wrote: >>> >>> Den 31/05/2010 kl. 21.50 skrev Erik Cederstrand: >>> >>> I do have a problem with buildworld on an unmodified ClangBSD src/ tree within

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Gerd Truschinski wrote: > Erik Cederstrand wrote: >> >> Den 31/05/2010 kl. 21.50 skrev Erik Cederstrand: >> >> >>> >>> I do have a problem with buildworld on an unmodified ClangBSD src/ tree >>> within a ClangBSD VM. Clang barfs on the mmintrin.h headers when buildi

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Gerd Truschinski
Erik Cederstrand wrote: Den 31/05/2010 kl. 21.50 skrev Erik Cederstrand: I do have a problem with buildworld on an unmodified ClangBSD src/ tree within a ClangBSD VM. Clang barfs on the mmintrin.h headers when building it's own Lexer because it picks up the gcc version of the headers inste

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Pawel Worach
On Jun 2, 2010, at 23:57, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:48:11PM +0200, Pawel Worach wrote: >> On May 31, 2010, at 16:57, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> >>> Can clang/LLVM build the livefs and bootonly CD's? >>> >> >> There is a buildbot here[1] that builds a live CD for boot >> testin

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 31/05/2010 kl. 21.50 skrev Erik Cederstrand: > I do have a problem with buildworld on an unmodified ClangBSD src/ tree > within a ClangBSD VM. Clang barfs on the mmintrin.h headers when building > it's own Lexer because it picks up the gcc version of the headers instead of > the clang vers

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:48:11PM +0200, Pawel Worach wrote: > On May 31, 2010, at 16:57, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Can clang/LLVM build the livefs and bootonly CD's? > > > > There is a buildbot here[1] that builds a live CD for boot > testing, so I would say it works. > > [1] http://amd64-cl

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Pawel Worach
On May 31, 2010, at 16:57, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Can clang/LLVM build the livefs and bootonly CD's? > There is a buildbot here[1] that builds a live CD for boot testing, so I would say it works. [1] http://amd64-clang-bot.qat.freebsd.org:8010/ -- Pawel___

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread Pawel Worach
On May 31, 2010, at 21:30, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > How much time (with -j1, approximately) does it take to build clang? Numbers for -j4 are about 1100 sec to build llvm+clang with gcc and about 700 seconds to build llvm+clang with clang. -- Pawel__

ZFS panic import

2010-06-02 Thread Danilo Baio
Hi, I have (had), a freebsd 8.0 release-p2 running a zfs poll with raidz, 3 disks 250gb SATA and 1 disk IDE... OK... this was running for a while without problem, but, some day ago, with a power outage the zfs don't import anymore. All the system was in the ZFS, so, i had to use a fixit cd for tr

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-06-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-02 17:26:09 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-02 17:26:09 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-06-02 17:26:09 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-02 17:26:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-02 17:26:30 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2010-06-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-02 18:21:16 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-02 18:21:16 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-06-02 18:21:16 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-02 18:21:24 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-02 18:21:25 - /usr/bin/c

Re: ata panic: "mtx_lock of destroyed mutex"

2010-06-02 Thread Matthew Jacob
Hmm. I just fixed that at Panasas, and I'm pretty sure that I gave the patch to Alexander Motin to put in. I've been setting up an amd64 VirtualBox machine with the latest 9-CURRENT and got the following panic when booting it (another machine updated and booting at the same time didn't panic):

ata panic: "mtx_lock of destroyed mutex"

2010-06-02 Thread Bruce Cran
I've been setting up an amd64 VirtualBox machine with the latest 9-CURRENT and got the following panic when booting it (another machine updated and booting at the same time didn't panic): ata1: WARNING - READ_TOC read data overrun 18>12 panic: mtx_lock of destroyed mutex @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_s

Re: Fwd: umodem (4) recognize a CDC-ACM device

2010-06-02 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
> > Hi, > > > > Can you dump the USB descriptors of your device? > > Hi, right now I can do this at "FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #8 r206060M", > but If you prefer tonight I can dump from 'freebsd-current' box. > > Thank you Hi, The problem is that LOW speed does not support BULK transfers according

Re: Fwd: umodem (4) recognize a CDC-ACM device

2010-06-02 Thread Marcelo/Porks
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Wednesday 02 June 2010 03:23:47 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Looks like this device might be a bit quirky... Just forwarding to you >> to see if you had any details for the OP. >> Thanks! >> -Garrett > > Hi, > > Can you dump the USB desc

Re: 'buildworld' not always pulling in /etc/src.conf

2010-06-02 Thread Andrius Morkūnas
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:23:19 +0300, Alexander Best wrote: it seems for some reason gcc44 gets chosen at some point as compiler instead of the base gcc. i DO have CC, CXX and CPP defined in my /etc/make.conf so that gcc44 gets used for ports and other stuff. HOWEVER /stc/src.conf also contains t

Re: Fwd: umodem (4) recognize a CDC-ACM device

2010-06-02 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 03:23:47 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Looks like this device might be a bit quirky... Just forwarding to you > to see if you had any details for the OP. > Thanks! > -Garrett Hi, Can you dump the USB descriptors of your device? usbconfig -u 0 -a 3 dump_device_desc dump_curr_c

'buildworld' not always pulling in /etc/src.conf

2010-06-02 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'm trying to run 'buildworld' on a fresh HEAD snapshot, but `make` is failing with this error: CC='gcc' mkdep -f .depend -a-DRESCUE /usr/src/usr.bin/id/id.c echo id: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend gcc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -funroll-loops -march=nocona -g -

Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting

2010-06-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 4:47:48 am Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:25:00AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > My understanding of nmount() is that that is what it does now. However, not > > everything is fully updated for nmount(). struct nfsargs is still passed in > > as a

Re: Importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD

2010-06-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 2:11:30 am Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:36:25 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Roman Divacky writes: > > > > I would like to propose to integrate clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD > > > in the near future (days, not weeks). > > > +1 > > +1 +1 I thin

Re: Panic after upgrade 7.2 -> 7.3

2010-06-02 Thread Ivan Voras
On 06/02/10 10:53, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > 02.06.2010 01:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет: >> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on >>> my router (after about a hour uptime). >> ... >>> Any ideas? >> >> Are yo

Re: BSDCan Toolchain Summit Summary

2010-06-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-May-31 17:57:32 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: >http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > >This includes a rough draft of a roadmap. We need to convert this into >a roadmap page with each required feature listed along with status and >contacts. Thank you for that. The approach

Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

2010-06-02 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Buganini wrote: > Hi, with yesterday's CURRENT my bwn works partially. > > this is my hardware > siba_b...@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x04b514e4 chip=0x431514e4 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' >

Re: Panic after upgrade 7.2 -> 7.3

2010-06-02 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
02.06.2010 01:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi. Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on my router (after about a hour uptime). ... Any ideas? Are you using IPsec? No. ___ fre

Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting

2010-06-02 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:25:00AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > My understanding of nmount() is that that is what it does now. However, not > everything is fully updated for nmount(). struct nfsargs is still passed in > as a blob value with the key "nfsargs" for example. This is not true any m