Re: SUJ update - new panic - "ffs_copyonwrite: recursive call"

2010-05-01 Thread Vladimir Grebenschikov
Hi While 'make buildworld' kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] ... #0 0xc056b93c in doadump () (kgdb) bt #0 0xc056b93c in doadump () #1 0xc0489019 in db_fncall () #2 0xc0489411 in db_command () #3 0xc048956a in db_command_loop () #4 0xc048b3ed in db_trap

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread sthaug
> > When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to > > re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA. > > I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling, > then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on. Fully a

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-01 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:44:20 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Thank you very much. > However it still panics when I tried to use b

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/01/10 18:10, Jeff Roberson wrote: > When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to > re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA. I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling, then disable journaling, I would expe

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Bruce Cran
On Sunday 02 May 2010 02:16:35 Alan Cox wrote: > Are you running an up to date kernel, specifically, one from today? If > not, please update. Kip committed some fixes throughout the day > yesterday. I was running a kernel from Friday - I've now updated to the latest sources and the panic has d

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Alan Cox
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the > > following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it. > > > > I've started seeing a panic "Sleeping t

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Bruce Cran wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it. I've started seeing a panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: > I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the > following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it. > I've started seeing a panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock", though it seems to be occurr

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-01 Thread Vladimir Grebenschikov
Hi > > Ehh, looks like fresh kernel is not too stable, it holds after some time > > of activity. > > > > DDB may be activated, but even 'call cpu_reset' does nothing here. > > > > Looks like it is not related to SUJ, it happens even with SUJ disabled. > Does reverting r207410 + r207412 help ? N

Re: ZFS Stability & MySQL (Comments Requested)

2010-05-01 Thread Pierre Massat
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: > By chance did you attempt to write a test file to the ZFS filesystem > holding the database and logs? Just curious if ZFS was hung since a > MySQL restart corrected it. Thank you for your help. Yes, I tried to write a file, without a

Re: mpt(4) MPI_EVENT_IR_RESYNC_UPDATE

2010-05-01 Thread pluknet
On 1 May 2010 19:03, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 06:50:26PM +0400, pluknet wrote: >> On 30 April 2010 18:22, Matthew Jacob wrote: >> > pluknet wrote: >> > Seems good to me- why not trhow it freebsd-scsi? if nobody says no, I'll >> > put >> > it in >> >> Err.. I thought that li

Re: mpt(4) MPI_EVENT_IR_RESYNC_UPDATE

2010-05-01 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 06:50:26PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > On 30 April 2010 18:22, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > pluknet wrote: > > Seems good to me- why not trhow it freebsd-scsi? if nobody says no, I'll put > > it in > > Err.. I thought that list is dedicated for cam related stuff. > > [cc'ing scsi

Re: Panic @r207433: "System call fork returning with the following locks held"

2010-05-01 Thread Andrew Reilly
Hi Kip, Sorry for the delay: it's been a tussle... On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:42:12PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > Does FBSDID get expanded when checking out with csup? Looks like it: > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c 207452 2010-04-30 > 22:31:37Z kmacy $"); My version says: __FBSDID("

Re: Making IFQ_MAXLEN tunable

2010-05-01 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:13 -0700 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to > set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that > parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases when > the syste

Re: Making IFQ_MAXLEN tunable

2010-05-01 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 01 May 2010 02:11:04 -0700 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:13 -0700 > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to > >> set length of the outgoing packets queue. The defau

Re: Making IFQ_MAXLEN tunable

2010-05-01 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Hi, Julian Elischer wrote: On 4/30/10 1:23 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Hi, Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that parameter is only 50, which is pretty

Re: Making IFQ_MAXLEN tunable

2010-05-01 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:13 -0700 Maxim Sobolev wrote: Hi, Many network drivers in the FreeBSD kernel use the IFQ_MAXLEN value to set length of the outgoing packets queue. The default value for that parameter is only 50, which is pretty low especially for the cases wh

if_em.c prevents the 2nd time resuming

2010-05-01 Thread Taku YAMAMOTO
Greetings, I found a bug in if_em.c which triggers a panic when resuming from the 2nd suspend. (sleep, wakeup, sleep and wakeup will result to a panic) It seems it has got introduced by r206001 (head) or r206211 (stable/8). I guess the following change mistakenly slipped into em_resume() which i