Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 4/10/10 3:35 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: [...] >> If I'm understanding you correctly you're saying it's an issue when I do: >> >> pkg_add A B C >> >> # 1 year passes >> >> pkg_add D >> >> # D depends on A, B, C, of different revisions.

Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 15:18 +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: > On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some > > others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense > > and so I put them here for comment. > > Please do. Someone has

boot process gets weirdly interrupted when using scroll lock

During the boot process, when rc scripts (or whatever) are printing messages, I turn on the scroll lock. As a result, I stop hearing my hard drive seeking, indicating that the system isn't loading. However, when I turn off the scroll lock, the boot process doesn't continue. It just hangs at the

Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > not to be a troll but ... > > ... for those that want the ease-of-use of PBIs, why not just use PC-BSD > in the first place? They seem to have their own QA process in place in > terms of keeping the various large applications at a sane level

SIGSEGV in dc, at bcode.c:277 (function reset_bmachine())

As these things go, this probably isn't as critical as most thinsg disussed on this list, but I happened to notice it today, built a debugging world and at least cornered the annoying little varmint. Sorry; no patch at this time. :-( Here's how to reproduce it: while running CURRENT, invoke dc(1)

Re: LOR on em in HEAD ( was Re: em driver regression

What's disabled is the drbr stuff in the stack, that will not keep the 82574 from initializing MSIX and multiple internal queues, if you have that adapter I would suggest you #define EM_MULTIQUEUE somewhere (Makefile, if_em.h or if_em.c) since I believe its the one place where you will benefit. At

Re: ports and PBIs

not to be a troll but ... ... for those that want the ease-of-use of PBIs, why not just use PC-BSD in the first place? They seem to have their own QA process in place in terms of keeping the various large applications at a sane level. Kernel development could (just like it is on the Macs) be don

Re: ports and PBIs

Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: I do have a question, assuming PBI's were merged officially into the FreeBSD ports tree, say I had PostgreSQL Server installed, via PBI. then I wanted to tweak a setting so I: cd /usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-server/ && make deinstall clean would the PBI at this point

Re: ports and PBIs

Julian Elischer wrote: On 4/10/10 12:07 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: [1] Actually, PBI might work just fine even for embedded if we address the disk bloat issue. One approach would be to make /Package/Bar/libfoo-2.8.7.so a symlink or hardlink to /Package/Shared/libfoo-2.8.7.so- This gives easy sharin

Re: LOR on em in HEAD ( was Re: em driver regression

At 03:29 PM 4/10/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: Added the missing locks around calls to rxeof and checked it in a minute ago. Sorry guys! Looks good for me now. BTW, I thought the multi-queue was supposed to be disabled on the em nic ? em0: port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xc1b0-0xc1b1,0xc1b250

Re: ports and PBIs

On 4/10/10 12:07 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: If I'm understanding you correctly you're saying it's an issue when I do: pkg_add A B C # 1 year passes pkg_add D # D depends on A, B, C, of different revisions. pkg_add barfs because it can't find the applications, etc. This is

Re: code.google -> Xpra (anyone planning to port it ?)

Wilkinson, Alex wrote: Howdy people, This looks like a very nice app, has anyone got it working on FreeBSD yet ? http://code.google.com/p/partiwm/wiki/xpra -Alex Well, and what about http://code.google.com/p/neatx/ ? That would be useful! :-) _

Re: ports and PBIs

Garrett Cooper wrote: If I'm understanding you correctly you're saying it's an issue when I do: pkg_add A B C # 1 year passes pkg_add D # D depends on A, B, C, of different revisions. pkg_add barfs because it can't find the applications, etc. This is something that's been hashed over a numbe

Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:18 AM, wrote: > > > > > On Sat 10/04/10 3:35 AM , Garrett Cooper wrote: > > [...] > >> >> yes but there are still dependency problems if you want to install a >> single >> package and you installed all the previous ones a year ago. >> With PBIs each package is self stan

Re: ports and PBIs

On 4/10/10 3:35 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 4/10/10 12:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM,

Re: LOR on em in HEAD ( was Re: em driver regression

Added the missing locks around calls to rxeof and checked it in a minute ago. Sorry guys! Jack On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > At 05:11 PM 4/9/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: >> >>> D

Re: ports and PBIs

On 4/10/10 10:36 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: I do have a question, assuming PBI's were merged officially into the FreeBSD ports tree, say I had PostgreSQL Server installed, via PBI. then I wanted to tweak a setting so I: cd /usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-server/&& make deinstall clean wou

Re: ports and PBIs

On 4/10/10 7:18 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense and so I put them here for comment. Please do. Someone has to do something about deploymen

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

Garrett Cooper writes: > Now you're making a dangerous assumption that /inst isn't being used > by the end-user for any predefined purpose. No, I'm making the entirely reasonable assumption that *during the installation process* sysinstall can mount whatever the hell it wants wherever the hell it

Re: LOR on em in HEAD ( was Re: em driver regression

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: Hi Mike, At 05:11 PM 4/9/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: Don't know, but I would just ignore it, I think its a false warning anyway. OK. I updated to HEAD as of this AM, but now I get a panic at bootup ... Trying to mount root from nfs: NFS ROOT: 10.255.25

Re: LOR on em in HEAD ( was Re: em driver regression

At 05:11 PM 4/9/2010, Jack Vogel wrote: Don't know, but I would just ignore it, I think its a false warning anyway. OK. I updated to HEAD as of this AM, but now I get a panic at bootup odule pci/rl failed to register: 17 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM

Re: ports and PBIs

BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px On Sat 10/04/10 3:35 AM , Garrett Cooper wrote: [...] > > yes but there are still dependency problems if you want to install a single > package and you installed all the previous ones a year ago. > With PBIs each packa

Re: ports and PBIs

On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense and so I put them here for comment. Please do. Someone has to do something about deployment. For what it's worth, I've tripped over

Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 4/10/10 12:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. >>  wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More >>>  wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer

Re: ports and PBIs

On 4/10/10 12:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some others and I, felt th

Re: ports and PBIs

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr

Re: ports and PBIs

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> >>> Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some >>> others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to ma

Trivial PR, fix shutdown of rc services started with onestart

This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There is a PR I consider old and trivial: This one proposes a change that always treats rc script execution of active services as if _enable="YES" was set. This ensures, among other things, a clean shutdown procedure for services started with onest

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

TB --- 2010-04-10 06:04:15 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-10 06:04:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-04-10 06:04:15 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-10 06:04:27 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-10 06:04:27 - /usr/b