-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My laptop manufacturer decided not to have AHCI included in the BIOS for
this device, so I've been looking at what needs to happen in order to
make this work.
On this device, the BIOS doesn't even initialize BAR(5), so I need to
start at that point ..
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
In file included from /src/sys/fs/coda/coda_fbsd.c:49:
/src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:97: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'CodaFid' /src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:199: error: expected ')' before
'*' token
Sorry all -- I'll commit a fix for this s
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc
-I. -I/src/sys -I/src
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:44:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:45:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-04-05 20:45:08 - /usr/bin/c
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:00:54PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that fxp(4) has a long standing races between controller
> and driver. The exotic RFD handling of controller is race prone as
> we had seen old ethernet controllers. I could easily reproduce this
> by rebooting syst
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, jhell wrote:
Hi,
reading the thread in thread view I had wondered why your reply had
been ignored until I realized that it was the last to come in. So
I'll use it to reply to, especially as I like it.
I have no idea (unless I'll read them) about the guts of various shell
fu
Hi,
the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g.
KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches
(say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat layer for top/ps/).
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-curren
John Hay wrote
in <20100405083056.ga8...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>:
jh> These questions actually start more questions for me. :-) Maybe we should
jh> also think from the user perspective and list a few use cases and what a
jh> user need to put in rc.conf to make that work?
jh>
jh> Your normal de
On 04/05/2010 00:21, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:13:40 -0700
>> From: Doug Barton
>>
>> On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>>> "Kevin Oberman" wrote
>>> in <20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net>:
>
> Gentlemen,
>
> I think this is converging on a good, functional s
Doug Barton wrote
in <4bb95564.1070...@freebsd.org>:
do> On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
do> > "Kevin Oberman" wrote
do> > in <20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net>:
do> >
do> > ob> The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
do> > ob> see no reason not to
On 04/04/10 22:42, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote
> in <4bb7e224.6020...@freebsd.org>:
>
> If people want to disable IPv6 GUA assignment in per-AF manner, it
> should be done by per-AF global knobs for $ifconfig_* because the GUA
> assignment involves $ifconfig_* knobs only for the u
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>> On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> I realize that this is most suitable for current@
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
> >> cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
>> cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken s
I think it's clear at this point that you and I have some pretty serious
disagreements about how this thing should look. I think that's
unfortunate, since you have a lot of good ideas, I just think some of
them are wrong. :) Seriously though, I hope we can find a way to come to
agreement.
I'm goin
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi all,
> I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
> cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
> the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
> what needs to
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:42:52PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote
> in <4bb7e224.6020...@freebsd.org>:
>
> do> As we've discussed previously, you and I have a lot of disagreement on
> do> some of these principles. I'm going to outline my responses in some
> do> detail, however I'
Doug Barton wrote
in <4bb95564.1070...@freebsd.org>:
do> On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
do> > "Kevin Oberman" wrote
do> > in <20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net>:
do> >
do> > ob> The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
do> > ob> see no reason not to
18 matches
Mail list logo
