> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:49:40 -0700
> From: Doug Barton
> Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
>
> As we've discussed previously, you and I have a lot of disagreement on
> some of these principles. I'm going to outline my responses in some
> detail, however I'm also interested in what ot
Ruben de Groot wrote:
> defer all questions about moving out of the base system ...
Last I knew, X was not _in_ the base system :)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, se
As we've discussed previously, you and I have a lot of disagreement on
some of these principles. I'm going to outline my responses in some
detail, however I'm also interested in what others have to say since I'd
ultimately like to see some consensus from the community on how this
should be configur
This is happening at boot time, but not every time. Yesterday's
-current, r206116. core.txt.3 is in freefall:~dougb.
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
246 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
#1 0xc05f754f in boot (howto=260)
at /usr/local/sr
I'm having some problems with iwi on -CURRENT.
FreeBSD scroll.ashke.com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Sat Apr 3
EDT 2010 r...@scroll.ashke.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCROLL i386
SCROLL is simply GENERIC without INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT,
WITNESS, and WITNESS_SKIPSPIN.
In loader.
on 03/04/2010 18:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 03/04/2010 18:07 Tijl Coosemans said the following:
>> I'm not sure the second paragraph is worth supporting, but the first
>> seems to say that 32k limit you have in your patch only applies to
>> disks with 512 byte sectors. For disks with
on 03/04/2010 18:07 Tijl Coosemans said the following:
>
> I'm not sure the second paragraph is worth supporting, but the first
> seems to say that 32k limit you have in your patch only applies to
> disks with 512 byte sectors. For disks with larger sectors it would
> be proportionally larger.
La
On Friday 02 April 2010 21:31:33 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 02/04/2010 22:26 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> OK, I did it again.
>> I tested the below patch using the scenario described above.
>> Could you please review and/or test this patch?
>> If you like it and it works, I can commit it.
>> T
On 4/2/10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 02/04/2010 22:26 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> OK, I did it again.
>> I tested the below patch using the scenario described above.
>> Could you please review and/or test this patch?
>> If you like it and it works, I can commit it.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --- a
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 02:08:27PM -0400, Charles Sprickman typed:
> Can we do sendmail next April 1?
Better yet, defer all questions about moving out of the base system by
referring to the Grand Discussion that'll take place *next year* on the
first of april.
___
Doug Barton wrote
in <4bb70e1e.3090...@freebsd.org>:
do> 1. There should be an ipv6_enable knob to easily turn IPv6 configuration
do> on and off when INET6 is in the kernel. I think the value of this kind
do> of knob is obvious, but I'd be happy to elaborate if that is necessary.
There were r
Am 02.04.2010 um 09:45 schrieb Randy Bush:
> it's the bridge that worries me. took me a while to make it work
It looks sane to me. Here's my slightly more convoluted setup (8-stable):
cloned_interfaces="bridge0 tap0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 gif0"
ifconfig_bridge0="ether 02:00:00:00:00:01 addm tap0 add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hrs@ has been doing some great work on bringing IPv6 support up to par
with IPv4, and deserves a lot of credit for that work. Included in those
changes were changes to the traditional semantics of how ipv6_enable
works. That variable was previousl
13 matches
Mail list logo
