Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-29 Thread Ryan Stone
> > BTW, why can't gdb find any variables? They are just stack variables whose > address is easy to find. > > ... >>> >>> #14 0x8042f24e in bread (vp=Variable "vp" is not available. >>> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:748 >>> >> > ... and isn't vp a variable? Maybe the bad default -O2 i

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-29 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: ... I am not a FAT expert and I know to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt. But please take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#Boot_Sector In our formula: SecPerClust *= pmp->pm_BlkPerSec; we have the following pa

Re: fsck unable to read disk sectors

2010-03-29 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/29/10, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > when doing fsck on my / fs i get this error: > > "Cannot Read BLK. 471617640" and "The Following Disk Sectors could not be > read: 471617643". after this message the partition gets marked dirty. > > i performed the following steps to verify the pro

fsck unable to read disk sectors

2010-03-29 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, when doing fsck on my / fs i get this error: "Cannot Read BLK. 471617640" and "The Following Disk Sectors could not be read: 471617643". after this message the partition gets marked dirty. i performed the following steps to verify the problem: 1) dd if=/dev/ada0 of=/dev/null bs=1m 2)

Re: Possible error in nfs_nfsdserv.c?

2010-03-29 Thread Rick Macklem
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: I've cc'd freebsd-current, so that anyone conversant with the FreeBSD VFS can jump in here. Am I right to assume that VOP_LOOKUP() for CREATE will set SAVENAME when returning error == 0? No, the caller has to set that flag. Some filesystems set it i

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-29 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 29/03/2010 23:29 Fabian Keil said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Thus, clearly, it is a fault of a tool that formatted the media for FAT. >> It should have picked correct values, or rejected incorrect values if >> those were provided as overrides via command line options. > > The kern

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-29 Thread Fabian Keil
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/03/2010 18:25 Fabian Keil said the following: > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Looking at the code in mountmsdosfs(), it seems that SecPerClust can > >> have zero value at the place of the crash only if pm_BlkPerSec is > >> zero. See this line and the check above it: > >>

Re: wpa_supplicant, Atheros AR9285 and FreeBSD 8.0 issue -> wpa_supplicant hangs

2010-03-29 Thread Eugene Dzhurinsky
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:46:10PM +0300, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote: > Okay, with simplified config things didn't change, so I submitted > PR: kern/145123 Sometimes I'm felling like being an idiot. I just realized that I had configured both laptops to use same IP address, which was noticed on logs

Re: Possible error in nfs_nfsdserv.c?

2010-03-29 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday 27 March 2010 9:49:23 am Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Petr Lampa wrote: > > > > > I've got several "panic: nfsrelpath", see attached photo. I've found > > one place where it could probably happen, please, can you look at this? > > > > First name buffer is initialized i

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-29 Thread Andriy Gapon
If you want to make sure that I see your reply please include me into recipient list. FreeBSD mailing lists sometimes have high volume and it's easy to miss a followup even if you are interested in reading it. on 28/03/2010 18:25 Fabian Keil said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Looking

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-03-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-29 11:37:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-29 11:37:24 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-03-29 11:37:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-29 11:37:36 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-29 11:37:36 - /usr/b

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-03-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-29 11:29:49 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-29 11:29:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-03-29 11:29:49 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-29 11:30:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-29 11:30:08 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-03-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-29 10:34:35 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-29 10:34:35 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-03-29 10:34:35 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-29 10:34:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-29 10:34:54 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-03-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-29 09:45:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-29 09:45:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-03-29 09:45:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-29 09:45:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-29 09:45:30 - /usr/bin