lock order reversal

2003-10-12 Thread Hiroo Ono
I've got a lock order reversal. #uname -a FreeBSD barleycoren.oikumene.gcd.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Sep 23 21:37:42 JST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/usr/src/sys/BARLEYCOREN i386 Oct 11 18:14:53 barleycoren kernel: 1st 0xc082f060 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_ma

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done"(5.1-CURRENT,IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Rob MacGregor
From: "Rob MacGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Same result for me as with 1.7. I've just grabbed 1.6 and am rebuilding to confirm that that's the last working version for me too. Backing out to 1.6 fixes the problem for me too... Please DO NOT send me ANY email directly unless it's a privacy issue.

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT,IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Rob MacGregor
From: "Steve Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anyone tried going forward to 1.8? Same result for me as with 1.7. I've just grabbed 1.6 and am rebuilding to confirm that that's the last working version for me too. Please DO NOT send me ANY email directly unless it's a privacy issue. Reply-to man

Kernel compile problem: Stop in /usr/src/sys/crypto/des/arch/i386/des_enc.S

2003-10-12 Thread Michael Langwiser
*** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MAJIN-20031012. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This occurs both when using the generic and my custom kernel config

Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-10-13 01:33 -0400, Wade Majors wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > >I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under > >some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running > >afterwards. > > It think it seems better (hard to be sure) but the issue is s

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:18:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > > Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time > > I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not > > hav

Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Wade Majors
Jeff Roberson wrote: I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running afterwards. It think it seems better (hard to be sure) but the issue is still there for me. GNOME/Metacity Single Processor Athlon Tb

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:49:59PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > > [ On Sunday, October 12, Kris Kennaway wrote: ] > > > > Thanks..Alan made a commit which he thought might have fixed this, but > > someone else also claimed it did not. > > > > See also > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query

HEADS-UP: SADB_X_AALG_RIPEMD160HMAC was changed

2003-10-12 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, I've just corrected the value of SADB_X_AALG_RIPEMD160HMAC from 9 to 8. If you are using IPsec stuff, it breaks binary compatibility. When updating your kernel, you need to update libipsec, setkey, racoon and isakmpd appropriately. Sincerely, --- Begin Message --- ume 2003/10/12 21:

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread John Reynolds
[ On Sunday, October 12, Kris Kennaway wrote: ] > > Thanks..Alan made a commit which he thought might have fixed this, but > someone else also claimed it did not. > > See also > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/56380 > > Kris Is there any more information that I can provide

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time > I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not > have done everything right. > > Ever since the tail end of July it seems,

_mtx_assert() panic

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
One of the package machines died with this, running -current from a few days ago. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x1c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc055ea8e stack pointer = 0x10:0xd9c0

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-10-12 Thread Sam Leffler
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 08:12 pm, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I've got a Netgear WAG511 (Atheros 5212-based card) and a Netgear FWAG114 > wireless router. > > I've been trying to get the card and the router talking under FreeBSD. > (Both 802.11a and 802.11g work fine under Windows on the same ma

Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps

2003-10-12 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote: > My notebook was a little bit "panic" this night. After rebooting I found > this message in my system log: > > panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps > > ? When are your sources from? > > Regards, > > Oliver Fischer > > _

panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread John Reynolds
Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not have done everything right. Ever since the tail end of July it seems, any time I've tried to burn a CD with cdrecord (cdrtools 2.0.3 from port

panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps

2003-10-12 Thread Oliver Fischer
My notebook was a little bit "panic" this night. After rebooting I found this message in my system log: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps ? Regards, Oliver Fischer ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mai

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: > >Back when the cd(4) driver used the old slice code, it had a function, >cdfirsttrackisdata(), that figured out whether the first track was an audio >or data track. It would set the flags in the disk structure accordingly to >tell the s

LOR in dummynet

2003-10-12 Thread Jiri Mikulas
map02# uname -a FreeBSD map02.modrany.czf 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 12 22:33:45 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER i386 Oct 13 00:25:32 map02 kernel: lock order reversal Oct 13 00:25:32 map02 kernel: 1st 0xc301f194 inp (inp) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Ames
> > > Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. > > > reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. > > > > I upgraded from an Oct 1 -> Oct 12 kernel and saw the same hang. > > Backing out r1.6 fixed it for me too. > > > "me too" Anyone tried going forward to 1.8?

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth Culver
Quoting Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In the last episode (Oct 08), Robert Ferguson said: > > I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in > > the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs > > immediately after > > > > ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at a

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 14:29:38 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:51:50PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Can I assume that the following error messages are > > > erronous because cd0 appears to function witho

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 08), Robert Ferguson said: > I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in > the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs > immediately after > > ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > ata1: resetting devices ..

Re: Seeing system-lockups on recent current

2003-10-12 Thread Cy Schubert
I'm seeing similar lockups, however they started shortly after the new ATA code was committed. The lockups usually occur when there's a lot of ATA activity, e.g. filesystem or fsck. At the moment I can only guess as to what the problem might be (missing interrupt is my most educated guesss) but

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:51:50PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Can I assume that the following error messages are > > erronous because cd0 appears to function without > > any problems? There is a CD in the drive. > > > > cd0 at a

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Jeff Roberson
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running afterwards. I'm going to look into the reports of some problems with nice, although I suspect that they could have been caused by the same issues. HTT is

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > Can I assume that the following error messages are > erronous because cd0 appears to function without > any problems? There is a CD in the drive. > > cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > cd0: 10.000

HEADSUP: Bluetooth patch is about to be committed

2003-10-12 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Dear Hackers, In the next few hours i will be committing Bluetooth patch. The patch was reviewed by M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> After commit i will re-cvsup my system and will do a full buildworld (could take 4-6 hours) to make sure everything works. Expec

Unable to boot cvsup 20031011

2003-10-12 Thread Anish Mistry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I finally recvsupped today as some problems with my ata stuff was fixed. Went through the normal buildworld/kernel progress and on reboot of loading the new kernel, it loads the kernel and modules and then as it starts booting it just causes my mac

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

Re: no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. > Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because > the new kernel gives absolutely no output. > > Console should be on vga. > I already tried swi

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:55:03AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival > : timings? > > In -stable I know that we service fast interrupts in < 1

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Sam Leffler
On Sunday 12 October 2003 11:03 am, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > > I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. > >

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Stuart Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard : dev. : > : what are the ins

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. > > > There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is tha

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Stuart Walsh
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard dev. > : what are the instructions > > building both pcic and pccard in your kernel config? If so, don't do > that. It i

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/

cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Kargl
Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without any problems? There is a CD in the drive. cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: cd present [129875 x 2048 byte

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival > timings? I am very interested in our idle load characteristics. It seems According to machdep.siots, fast interrupt handler latency on an old Celeron266 is about 10 usec (max) for sh

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival : timings? In -stable I know that we service fast interrupts in < 10us on a 666MHz machine 99.2% of the time. I don't know about non-fast inte

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard dev. : what are the instructions building both pcic and pccard in your kernel config? If so, don't do that. It is broken. pc

Re: ATAng still causing a lot of pain.

2003-10-12 Thread Kirk Strauser
Further details: The ATA drive in questions is: ad0: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 The PIO4 comes from booting with 'hw.ata.ata_dma="0"'; it would otherwise be "UDMA66". Basically, if I use atacontrol to set that channel to WDMA2 or below, then I get no errors (but performanc

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: > > I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. > > There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that > > everything is fine for a few hours, and then the

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:43:59 +0100 Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:37:44PM +, Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] wrote: > > Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks > > i have not been abel to compile the kernel. > > > > fest it was

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:37:44PM +, Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] wrote: > Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks > i have not been abel to compile the kernel. > > fest it was the pccardvar.h was mising this:: Did you follow all the instructions in UPDATING? I ha

[Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]
Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks i have not been abel to compile the kernel. fest it was the pccardvar.h was mising this:: // in pccard_mem_handle longoffset; /* mapped Offset on card */ #define PCCARD_MEM_ATTR 1 #define PCCARD_M

Re: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA recovered from missing interrupt

2003-10-12 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:05:36PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: > What type of drive is in your dell? I get this same error with an SATA > drive and adapter. ad0: 28615MB IC25N030ATDA04-0 [58140/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 I believe it's an IBM Travelstar . -- Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_p

no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because the new kernel gives absolutely no output. Console should be on vga. I already tried switching to a vga card and to disable int routing, because I often saw probl

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: > I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. > There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that > everything is fine for a few hours, and then the IP stack stops working. > I can no longer ping anything on the local ne

What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Josef Karthauser
I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that everything is fine for a few hours, and then the IP stack stops working. I can no longer ping anything on the local network, my default route drops out (which

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > See my previous email dated Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:39:20 -0400 on the > subject. It looks like the problem may have to do with CPU type (PIII > in my case). My P4 laptop has the same -CURRENT, and does not > experience the problem. It may also be note

panic with -current kernel ata_timeout

2003-10-12 Thread C. Kukulies
with a -current cvsup I'm getting a kernel panic during boot: ata_timout soft_clock ithread fork_exit fork_trampoline __trap 0x1 -- Chris Christoph Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
afd0: REMOVABLE at ata1-master PIO3 acd0: CDROM at ata3-master PIO4 panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Debugger("panic") Stopped at 0xc062f644 = Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,0xc0736c24 = in_Debugger.0 db> trace Debugger(c0689675,c06e18c0,c069daaf,d88b1cb4,100) at 0xc062f644 = Debugger+0x5

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:35:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: > > > On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following > > > > on rebooting > > > > > >

Re: umass(4)/uhci(4) REALLY slow

2003-10-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Nate Lawson wrote this message on Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 17:34 -0700: > 1 KB? If we upped it to 32 KB, it would be a more reasonable 1.2 MB/sec > which is still well under the USB 1.1 max speed. If you get 1.2MB/sec (megabytes), then you have hit the max of USB 1.1, the max speed of USB 1.1 is 12mb

Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Nate Lawson
Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival timings? I am very interested in our idle load characteristics. It seems most systems I've analyzed have an average idle interrupt rate of about 225 per second, dominated by the clk and rtc interrupts as shown below. clk irq0