Hi,
with a -CURRENT from today the scsi cd driver seems to have moved under
GEOM. Actually a good move this gives me a problem:
I have a Plextor PX-40 cd-rom which seems to report it's status a little
slow when being reinitialized this means I have to wait about 60-90
seconds during boot time bef
I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people.
I'll be following this up, so could folks please report here if things
break? (and feel free to say so if you find the problem :-). It would
also be interesting to know that things are ok for a few people too.
If you're s
On Thursday 02 October 2003 13:53, Mike Hunter wrote:
> > Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system
> > reboots. Any suggestions?
>
> ME TOO!
My wife's computer did this. In the end I turned down all the knobs I
could find (mostly AGP speed stuff).
It still dies when tryi
On Oct 01, "Justin Smith" wrote:
> MY system:
> FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1
> 13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> i386
>
>
> Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system
> reboots. Any suggestions?
ME
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Here are "iostat 5" results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller
> > > with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly.
> > > On Fre
Has anyone managed to get any SD card reader to work under current? I
know the Sitecom CN-300 is listed in the manual page but every post I've
seen regarding it was for SmartMedia. I've seen no actual confirmation
that it works with SD cards. And if they do I'd have to import one from
the UK as the
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 29), Wilko Bulte said:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:19:30PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > > I also mentioned recently (in the last couple of days) that we
> > > should worry more about sparc64 than alpha. Simply because I think
> > > alpha is on i
Hi!
I've just installed 5.1-RELEASE (updated to -current) on a
Dual Opteron 1.4 with 6GB memory installed (MSI K8D Master-F).
Without 'options PAE' the system works fine (beside the 'missing' 2GB).
Enabling PAE in a custom kernel (device acpi, options SMP, options APIC_IO
and makeoptions NO_MODULE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin Smith wrote:
>MY system:
>FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1
>13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>i386
>
>
>Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system
>reboots. Any sugges
MY system:
FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1
13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system
reboots. Any suggestions?
___
[EMA
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and
> > that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing,
> > but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before
>
> sysctl hw.acpi should show you what the
> Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and
> that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing,
> but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before
> completing the shutdown. The motherboard beeps three times, the
> screen goes blank, an
Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and
that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing,
but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before
completing the shutdown. The motherboard beeps three times, the
screen goes blank, and will co
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
> On 01/10/03 09:33 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > As far as debugging prints, add the following printfs to
> > > > acpi_cmbat_get_bif():
> > > >
> > > > printf("Before getting BIF\n");
> > > > as = AcpiEvaluateObject(h, "_BIF", NULL, &bif_buffer
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Here are "iostat 5" results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller
> > with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly.
> > On FreeBSD, it really lags. This is for a cp of a large
It seems Steve Ames wrote:
> G'day.
>
> My company is putting together a system with lots of file system on it to do disk
> based backup.
>
> Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing optimally) SATA RAID
> controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What manufacturer/model of SATA disks do
G'day.
My company is putting together a system with lots of file system on it to do disk
based backup.
Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing optimally) SATA RAID
controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What manufacturer/model of SATA disks do you recommend
for that controller?
Thi
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:42:34AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> > since 3 weeks i've problems with my 5.1-CURRENT Box. When i try to
> > delete very large direktories (for examplte the builddir of a make
> > release) the box Panics.
> >
> > pani
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:49:30PM +0300, J8keR wrote:
> Does this mean wait until its fixed or am I missing some update ?
It means wait until it's fixed, or fix it yourself and submit the patch.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Poul-Henning -
I've tried your patch. It worked great when I _applied_ it. After I rebooted, it went
back to same OLD problem again -- crawling slow connection. It drove me crazy that I
cannot figure it out to improve it when I have time on my hand.
Since I have time, I'd like to help you to
On 01/10/03 09:33 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
> > On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please
> > > try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If
> > > s
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
> On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please
> > try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If
> > so, then when it hangs, hit CTRL-ALT-ESC and type "tr".
On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please
> try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If
> so, then when it hangs, hit CTRL-ALT-ESC and type "tr". This will tell
> who is hung.
>
> As far as deb
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 06:39:47 +
From: Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kevin Oberman wrote:
[...]
Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck.
The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file
system with soft updates enabled. Because of the way s
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 06:39:47 +
> From: Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck.
> >
> > The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file
> > system with soft updates enabled. Because of
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> since 3 weeks i've problems with my 5.1-CURRENT Box. When i try to
> delete very large direktories (for examplte the builddir of a make
> release) the box Panics.
>
> panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map to small: 275251200 total allocated
> cpuid=0: l
Gabriel,
Interesting, since no one's made any PATA drives that spin at
10,000 RPM as far as I know. For some reason I thought the
interface change allowed for this (but couldn't come up with a
good reason why it would make a difference). :)
SS> Hmm, PR? pricing? I guess its easier to make people
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
> > Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot b
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available
> > on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pr
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.2.
FreeBSD 5.2 Op
Hi Soren Schmidt,
you wrote.
SS> It seems Will Andrews wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>> > No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
>> > marvell PATA->SATA converter "on board", its not a "pure" SATA
>> > design, but just the old st
Does this mean wait until its fixed or am I missing some update ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available
> > on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pr
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:49:33 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now,I don't/wouldn't have softupdates enabled on / .. does the 'background
> fsck' know to not background if softupdates are not enabled? I'm going to
> switch back to -p and look a bit closer the next time i
Just wanted to do a followup to report that the problems I was having
earlier with my ata1-master device not being attached on boot have now gone
away with the latest build I just completed (cvsupped Tues, 9/30).
Nice work, Soren. :-)
--
Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas"
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available
> on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates
> UFS2.
Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about
36 matches
Mail list logo
