On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Vincent Poy wrote:
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
> -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I.
> -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
> -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath
> -I/us
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
GT>On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:11:01PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
GT>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Richard Nyberg wrote:
GT>>
GT>> RN>At Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST),
GT>> RN>Harti Brandt wrote:
GT>> RN>> Hi,
GT>> RN>>
GT>> RN>> I just tried to upgrade o
It seems Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
> Hello,
> We used to have this ioctl in old ATA/ATAPI driver (and still do in
> sys/cdio.h); apparently, it's no longer there with ATAng. Is this a bug or
> feature? And if this was planned what's going to replace it? As it is,
> this change has broken cdparanoia c
TB --- 2003-09-18 04:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-09-18 04:00:01 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-18 04:01:51 - building world
TB --- cd /
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Anish Mistry wrote:
> I reported this serveral times and no one seemed to be able to
> reproduce the problem, and I couldn't figure out what wasn't being
> shutoff. FInally I think that I figured it out. The display is the
> thing that is not being shutoff. The reason I misse
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> pcic and newcard are an unsupported combination. take pcic out of
> your kernel.
>
> Warner
Thanks Warner... Somehow I had the #device pcic like the generic
kernel but guess I had to force write the kernel config file. Probably
would be a go
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:19:38PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote:
> (...)
> btw: the mozilla-firebird performance problem mention earlier seems to
> be something different: firebird launches relativly fast and as soon as
> running i can us the menus and everything which is reachable via mouse.
>
sebastian ssmoller wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote:
From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two
times faster as
before (!) (30s -> 15-17s)
can anyone explain me why, pls ?
I wonder how hot your processor is?
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > I'm getting crashes when trying to debug mozilla (under KSE).
> > The panic message is "panic: absolutely cannot call smp_ipi_shootdown
> > with interrupts already disabled". Attached is the trace.
> > Any
Hi all,
big mysterious bug is lingering somwhere. (Machine: C3, 256MB, 2x 30GB 2,5"
IDE, SIL0680 controller)
One of my drives failed with the following recovered from messages:
Sep 16 01:47:44 tek kernel: ad4: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 -
resetting
Sep 16 01:47:45 tek kernel: ata2: rese
Hi,
it looks like getfacl has problems with long groupnames:
add a group named "averylonggroupname"
touch acl-test
setfacl -m g:averylonggroupname:rw acl-test
bash-2.05b# getfacl acl-test
#file:acl-test
#owner:0
#group:2000
getfacl: acl-test: Cannot allocate memory
this seems to be a problem with
Le Mer 17/09/2003 à 07:40, Thomas Quinot a écrit :
> Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
>
> > The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report
> > 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s.
>
> OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test
> whether the
TB --- 2003-09-17 23:00:42 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-09-17 23:00:42 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-17 23:04:01 - building world
TB
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> So this brings up the question, is there a known problem with
> debugging multi-threaded applications (which use libkse) that can
> cause a panic? I will bring home my laptop, and will be able to use a
> serial debugger if that would help anyone willing
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 14:37, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:21:39PM -0700, Scott Reese wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:48, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > Scott Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Though I'm not sure if RAM is my problem because I'm not getting Sig 11
TB --- 2003-09-17 21:28:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-09-17 21:28:02 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-17 21:31:28 - building world
TB --- cd /home
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I get this panic on a system with kernel/world from 03 September.
> Usually i only run X and xawtv on that system but when i wanted to make
> world today i got the panic:
>
This was fixed recently. Can you cvsup and rebuild?
> Kris Kennawa
Hi.
I get this panic on a system with kernel/world from 03 September.
Usually i only run X and xawtv on that system but when i wanted to make
world today i got the panic:
Kris Kennaway reported something IMHO similar on 07/31/03
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: deadc000
Debugger(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I reported this serveral times and no one seemed to be able to
reproduce the problem, and I couldn't figure out what wasn't being
shutoff. FInally I think that I figured it out. The display is the
thing that is not being shutoff. The reason I miss
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:21:39PM -0700, Scott Reese wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:48, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Scott Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Though I'm not sure if RAM is my problem because I'm not getting Sig 11
> > > errors. I keep getting extremely consistent intern
Hi,
I'm running a jail on -CURRENT with
jail_enable="YES"
jail_list="myjail"
jail_myjail_rootdir="/home/myjail"
...
in /etc/rc.conf. I already filed a PR with a patch:
PR bin/56748: jail devfs handling broken
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56748
the problem is that I still can'
Olev wrote:
Tried JSNAP's 20030917 build, still the same: with softupdates on I get
a panic when extreacting base, with softupdates off everything is OK.
Any ideas?
Olev
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 22:27 +0200:
> > If you're file system is so hosed that it does this, then panicing
> > is the only safe thing to do. You don't know what continued operation
> > will do to the filesytem, and you might end up losing more data.
>
> You don't
Tried JSNAP's 20030917 build, still the same: with softupdates on I get
a panic when extreacting base, with softupdates off everything is OK.
Any ideas?
Olev
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cu
Hello,
We used to have this ioctl in old ATA/ATAPI driver (and still do in
sys/cdio.h); apparently, it's no longer there with ATAng. Is this a bug or
feature? And if this was planned what's going to replace it? As it is,
this change has broken cdparanoia cooked ioctls interface (BTW, that's why
it
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:52:03PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Bernd Walter wrote this message on Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:27 +0200:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> > >
> > > >This is either disk
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:48, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Scott Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Though I'm not sure if RAM is my problem because I'm not getting Sig 11
> > errors. I keep getting extremely consistent internal compiler errors
> > pretty much whenever I try to build *anything*.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > I'm getting crashes when trying to debug mozilla (under KSE).
> > The panic message is "panic: absolutely cannot call smp_ipi_shootdown
> > with interrupts already disabled". Attached is the trace.
> > Any
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:27 pm, Paul Richards wrote:
> >I was thinking of adding an option to install so it registers the file
> >in a plist rather than actually doing the install. A seperate "make
> >plist" target co
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:27 +0200:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >
> > >This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs passes the garbage
> > >block number 0xe
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> I'm getting crashes when trying to debug mozilla (under KSE).
> The panic message is "panic: absolutely cannot call smp_ipi_shootdown
> with interrupts already disabled". Attached is the trace.
> Any ideas?
% (kgdb) bt
% #0 doadump () at /opt/FreeBSD
> I've got a Netgear WAG511 (Atheros 5212-based card) and a Netgear FWAG114
> wireless router.
>
> I've been trying to get the card and the router talking under FreeBSD.
> (Both 802.11a and 802.11g work fine under Windows on the same machine.)
>
> I'm using -current from September 15th.
>
> Anyw
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote:
> > I wonder how hot your processor is? perhaps ACPI is throttling
> > the clock back, either duty cycle or frequency.
> > In your bios you can set the power mode, perhaps you
> > c
I get these in less than 20min. config is pretty close to GENERIC except
turned on SMP
and APIC_IO. Turned off INET6.
Any advice?
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) IPFW static rules @ /usr/src
/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:1492
first acquired
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote:
> > Motherboard Temp Voltages
> >
> > 255C / 491F / 528KVcore1: +3.984V
> >Vcore2: +3.984V
> > Fan Speeds +
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote:
> Motherboard Temp Voltages
>
> 255C / 491F / 528KVcore1: +3.984V
>Vcore2: +3.984V
> Fan Speeds + 3.3V: +3.984V
>+ 5.0V: +6.65
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:05:59PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote:
>
> as mentioned: really bad performace occurs when lauching mozilla, gaim,
> gnome2, etc. ... when mozilla is running the perfomance seems to be ok
> ... possibly a bit too slow but i do not know how to proof this (?)
I discover
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:27:28 -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I
> reboot
> and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks li
I'm getting crashes when trying to debug mozilla (under KSE).
The panic message is "panic: absolutely cannot call smp_ipi_shootdown
with interrupts already disabled". Attached is the trace.
Any ideas?
--
Dan Eischen
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is fr
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I
> > reboot
> > and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like the HD is spinning
> > forever for no reason. Also, the ATAng can't fi
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote:
> From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> >
> > i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two
> > times faster as
> > before (!) (30s -> 15-17s)
> >
> > can anyone explain me why, pls ?
>
> I wonder how hot your proce
From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
>
> i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two
> times faster as
> before (!) (30s -> 15-17s)
>
> can anyone explain me why, pls ?
I wonder how hot your processor is? perhaps ACPI is throttling
the clock back, either duty cyc
(...)
hi,
> I agree with the general concensus that this shows all the symptoms of
> a network or DNS problem - though the switch from SIS to nVidia may
> have disturbed X.
>
> Did you change any system configuration (hostname etc) when you moved
> the disk? Is the 'production' environment iden
here is my vmstat -i output:
interrupt total rate
stray irq01 0
stray irq71 0
npx0 irq131 0
ata0 irq1492143 2
ata1 irq15
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:27 pm, Paul Richards wrote:
I was thinking of adding an option to install so it registers the file
in a plist rather than actually doing the install. A seperate "make
plist" target could then be used as a helper target to automate the
generation of plists.
I
TB --- 2003-09-17 16:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-09-17 16:00:01 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-17 16:01:51 - building world
TB --- cd /
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I
reboot
and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like the HD is spinning
forever for no reason. Also, the ATAng can't find my Teac CD-RW..
He
At Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:54:42 -0700,
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:11:01PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Richard Nyberg wrote:
> >
> > RN>At Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST),
> > RN>Harti Brandt wrote:
> > RN>> Hi,
> > RN>>
> > RN>> I just
Err, for some reason the email client ate my subject..
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I
reboot
and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like the HD is spinning
forever for n
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:11:01PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Richard Nyberg wrote:
>
> RN>At Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST),
> RN>Harti Brandt wrote:
> RN>> Hi,
> RN>>
> RN>> I just tried to upgrade one of my systems from a static root from july to
> RN>> an actual
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:29:07AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
>>
>> Please send me your kernel config and tell me again exactly what fails.
>> I will try to reproduce your problem.
>>
>> Sam
> After your yesterday/today commits, I got panic while doing netstat -an.
> On the kernel from abou
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:45, Mark Murray wrote:
> Paul Richards writes:
> > I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> > be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> > like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
Paul Richards writes:
> I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
> re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfu
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:29:07AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> Please send me your kernel config and tell me again exactly what fails. I
> will try to reproduce your problem.
>
> Sam
After your yesterday/today commits, I got panic while doing netstat -an. On
the kernel from about two day
pcic and newcard are an unsupported combination. take pcic out of
your kernel.
Warner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Don Bowman wrote:
> > This may be a dumb question, but I have
> > a situation where machine A and B both have
> > enabled serial console. I'm ssh'ing into A to
> > try and debug a problem on B. I'm trying to
> > use tip, but am getting interference fr
Paul Richards wrote:
> I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
> re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfu
I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfully created
packages of /sbin
TB --- 2003-09-17 11:04:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-09-17 11:04:41 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-17 11:06:35 - building world
TB
Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
> The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report
> 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s.
OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test
whether the actual performances are improved or still slow?
Thomas.
--
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-17, Guillaume écrivait :
>
> > > + if (atapi_dma && atp->channel->dma &&
> > > + (atp->param->config & ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR)
> > > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX);
> > > + else
> > > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX)
TB --- 2003-09-17 09:32:24 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-09-17 09:32:24 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-09-17 09:35:35 - building world
TB --- cd /home
Michael L. Hostbaek (mich) writes:
>
> touch: not found
> *** Error code 127
>
> Stop in /usr/src/include.
> *** Error code 1
>
Seems to be a date problem - sorry for jumping the gun.
/mich
--
Best Regards,
Michael L. Hostbaek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.FreeBSD.org
It seems Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, the ATA driver has just grown more standard compliant :)
> > You *must* hang around for 31secs to wait for slow devices to come ready,
> > according to the ATA specs. Now I've gone to great length before to
>
Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:57:58 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. 3.6.1 has the same bug, and 3.7 isn't out yet.
> http://www.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-announce/2003-September/64.html
We use OpenSSH-portable, whi
Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the ATA driver has just grown more standard compliant :)
> You *must* hang around for 31secs to wait for slow devices to come ready,
> according to the ATA specs. Now I've gone to great length before to
> get around this by using clever heuristics,
After doing a fresh cvsup of the RELENG_5_1 branch, and a successfull
make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel - I get the
following error when issueing a make installworld:
--
>>> Installing everything..
---
Le 2003-09-17, Guillaume écrivait :
> > + if (atapi_dma && atp->channel->dma &&
> > + (atp->param->config & ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR)
> > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX);
> > + else
> > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX);
Ahem. Replace atadev with atp on both lines
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:57:58 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> look pretty on your screen?
A
David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> > to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> > look pretty on your screen?
> Umm,
"Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> > to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> > look pretty on your screen?
> Apparently, yes.
No. 3.6.1 has the same bug, and 3.7 isn't out yet.
DES
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
>Don't you think that people will report them if the filesystem is
>automatically unmounted?
We can't sensibly do that.
>Accepted that's not an option for the GEOM point and that panicing
>here can be good to fix range checking in the filesyst
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
> >On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >>
> >> >This is either disk corruption or an f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
>On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>
>> >This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs passes the garbage
>> >block number 0xe5441ae9720 to bread.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>
> >This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs passes the garbage
> >block number 0xe5441ae9720 to bread. GEOM then handles this austerely
> >by panicing. Garbage
It seems Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>
> ATAng will no longer recognize the DVD-ROM device on ata1-master. This is
> without atapicam. The CD-RW drive at ata1-slave is OK, and is being assigned
> to acd0 now.
OK, from you dmesg:
>ata1: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=50
>ata1-master: stat=0
(dmesg.boot attached)
ATAng will no longer recognize the DVD-ROM device on ata1-master. This is
without atapicam. The CD-RW drive at ata1-slave is OK, and is being assigned
to acd0 now.
Incidentally, when did the hw.ata.* sysctls change?
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyrig
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs passes the garbage
>block number 0xe5441ae9720 to bread. GEOM then handles this austerely
>by panicing. Garbage block numbers, including negative ones, can possibly
>be created by applicat
Aloha!
Terry Lambert wrote:
Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
So now the tousand dollar question becomes "What in the boot contains a
timeout around 30 seconds, a timout that lately has been
committed/ctivated in the kernel code?"
SCSI has one of these; are you compiling with ATAPICAM?
Nope. No ATAPICA
79 matches
Mail list logo
