Re: Can't connect to wireless network with recent -CURRENT

On Thursday, 3 July 2003 at 16:33:30 +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > MWL>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MWL>Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MWL>: I think the same problem was reported by Rob Holmes two weeks ago and by > MWL>: me

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You only enabled 1/3 of the source to use PROCESS_OPTIONS, you also need > to > > add the option to libwrap (lib/libwrap) and tcpdchk > (src/usr.sbin/tcpdchk). > > > Small correction, the lib/libwrap/Makefil

Re: Panic at boot time on SMP

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:34:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100 > > fault virtual address = 0xdf119fec > > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc030b254

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You only enabled 1/3 of the source to use PROCESS_OPTIONS, you also need to > add the option to libwrap (lib/libwrap) and tcpdchk (src/usr.sbin/tcpdchk). > Small correction, the lib/libwrap/Makefile is setting PROCESS_OPTIONS in it's CFLAGS. The only ot

Call for testers: rl(4) optimized for 8139C+

Somehow I doubt I'm going to get a lot of responses to this, since I'm not sure how many people besides me actually have an 8139C+ NIC. That said, if you have one, and you're running FreeBSD 5.1 or later, please try the driver code at: http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/RealTek/cplus If you a

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In -CURRENT, /usr/src/libexec/tcpd, the Makefile doesn't have > -DPROCESS_OPTIONS needed which in hosts_access(5) manpage, allows things > such as banners for the tcp_wrappers to be working. > > So in the /usr/src/libexec/tcpd/Makefile, I added > -DPROCESS

Re: features of ICH5/ICH5-R supported in -current or 5.1-RELEASE?

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:07:46AM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > It seems John Reynolds wrote: > > Hi all, I'm wondering if some of the features of the ICH5 found in > > the springdale and canterwood platforms (i865/i875) are currently > > supported in either 5.1-RELEASE or -CURRENT? > > > > I've

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2003-07-04 19:58:21 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-07-04 19:58:21 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-04 20:01:10 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeffrey Hsu wr ites: > > I'm sitting on a ISDN line right now, and I thought the newreno issues > > had been solved, but by disabling newreno I get a distinctly better > > web-surfing experience. > >NewReno is a sender-side only algorithm and web-surfing is mostly

Compaq Armada E500 - 5.1 install failure

Does anyone happened to install a fresh 5.1 on Compaq Armada E500? I have the following errors: with ACPI: (Stopping after the line:) Mounting from ufs:/dev/md0 And it seems (almost)nothing was discovered among the devices (more times on the screen: 'acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR') (Power profil

Re: [review request] New config.5 manual page

Dealing with maxusers can be a bit confusing depending upon the approach taken. You may want to add a bit of additional information: maxusers number This optional directive is used to configure the size of some kernel data structures. number should be an

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

"M. Warner Losh" writes: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : "M. Warner Losh" writes: > : > Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was > : > broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time > : >

Re: Lucent firmware

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: JH>My card says JH> JH> wi0: using Lucent Embedded WaveLAN/IEEE JH> wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.16.1) JH> JH>Full information on the machine available at JH> http://people.freebsd.org/~hsu/vx88 JH> JH>This may be a different make from your chipset. JH

RE: who am i

I don't think this is a problem with su. The same occurs when running login in a shell, then logging out. I've seen this bug in FreeBSD since early 4.x, I guess I just never bothered to mention it, thinking someone would notice and fix it. It has certainly scared me a few times, it would be nice if

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

> I'm sitting on a ISDN line right now, and I thought the newreno issues > had been solved, but by disabling newreno I get a distinctly better > web-surfing experience. NewReno is a sender-side only algorithm and web-surfing is mostly a receiver-side experience. If you gather some quantitati

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: JH> > I've had to disable newreno on my machines as well. JH> > have a wireless link to a DSL line, and I get much better JH> > performance when I do that. JH> JH>I would go test wireless links, but if_wi stopped working for my notebook. After updating th

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeffrey Hsu write s: >There's only one outstanding bug that I know of with newreno and there's >a patch in testing for that. You can find it in > http://people.freebsd.org/~hsu/tmp/explicitnewreno.diff >Please let me know if this has any effect on the problem you'

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I would go test wireless links, but if_wi stopped working for my notebook. The wireless link is fine. I haven't upgraded it in a while, and it is working great. It does have some bursty packet loss that I can't

Installation Porblem for 5.1R and Alpha500a

Hi All, I am a newbie of Alpha. I know little about alpha. I tried to install 5.1R to alpha box. I successfully booted to the sysinstall. However in the bsdlabel, I can not find any disk in it. When I check the boot message, I found my scsi disk is regonized as /dev/da0. In the alt-F2 debug scre

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

> I've had to disable newreno on my machines as well. > have a wireless link to a DSL line, and I get much better > performance when I do that. I would go test wireless links, but if_wi stopped working for my notebook. There's only one outstanding bug that I know of with newreno and there's

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was : > broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time : > ago, my change just opened a race tha

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

"M. Warner Losh" writes: > Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was > broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time > ago, my change just opened a race that used to be won, but now is > lost. Yup. I believe so, but please confirm where the change

The behavior of 'who'

Is this the expected output for an unexpected input?: $ who /etc . May 9 03:09 (
?) netconfig?? Jan 10 11:57 () ices Oct 23 13:41 (hosts) bSep 8 18:48 (gnats)  Jan 10 11:31 (?<) e

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time ago, my change just opened a race that used to be won, but now is lost. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list h

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm sitting on a ISDN line right now, and I thought the newreno issues : had been solved, but by disabling newreno I get a distinctly better : web-surfing experience. : : Is newreno working as designed righ

Re: Panic in scheduler code with SCHED_ULE during boot tomulti-user.

Excellent debugging. Can you tell me whats in kseq_cpu[0] and kseq_cpu[1]? I think I may know what the problem is. Do you have some negative niced processes or some positive nice processes? On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Richard Todd wrote: > Hi. Last night I upgraded to the most recent -current source

[review request] New config.5 manual page

The attached manual page documents the syntax for the kernel configuration files as understood by the config(8) program in 5-CURRENT. This syntax has diverged from the syntax understood by the original 4.4BSD config(8) program, and it is perhaps time for a new manual page. This manual entry is t

Re: who am i

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hello, > > Doh, forgot to mention: the following patch fixes it for me. This indeed fixes it. Thanks! Regards, Richard. Paul Vixie in an interview with Sendmail.net: Now that the Internet has the full spectrum of humanity as users, the technolog

lock order reversal on recent (06/30) CURRENT

Is the following a known problem? (occured while running python2.3 using kse) lock order reversal 1st 0xc03c3c40 smp rendezvous (smp rendezvous) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_smp.c:3 13 2nd 0xc03c00c0 sched lock (sched lock) @ /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c:2 92 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c0343