Thus spake Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:28:46 -0800
> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pentium 4 is definitely broken on 5.x. Perhaps, we should remove
> > the footshooting.
> >
> > --- bsd.cpu.mk.orig Sat Mar 22 10:23:42 2003
> > +++ bsd.cpu.mk Sat Mar 22
Today's current. I cannot dump core at this time...
panic: headlocked should be 1
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
db> trace
Debugger(c03bad7e,0,c03c3c6f,e1190b28,1) at Debugger+0x55
panic(c03c3c6f,c47a2034,e1190b74,c3b2
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Vincent Poy wrote:
> > I've recently went from a February 6, 2003 -CURRENT to a March 8,
> > 2003 -CURRENT and for whatever reason, the stuff that used to work
> > installed from ports all broke with Bad System Call (core dump), has
> > anyone else expe
subscribe freebsd-current
subscribe cvs-all
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I just loaded 5.0 from a nice new install and I have loads of this stuff scrolling
across my screen. I have every process that running scrolling this stuff. I've
followed a bunch of the threads, and looked on the FreeBSD site but I can't seem to
find out how to make it stop. I've seen lots of
Hi
I received this panic whilst terminating program sem_d
(src/lib/libpthread/test) with Ctrl+C. sem_d seems to stall after the
first block of threads have been completed: the system only panics upon
issuing a Ctrl+C to sem_d. sem_d successfully ran to completion when
compiled with -pthread.
Thank you.
I find that I haven't cvsup x11/XFree86-4-libraries for a while.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 11:57:18AM +0900, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
> Is it only with me?
>
> XFree86-4-Server cannot be compiled on recent -current,
> FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Sat Mar 22 13:21:34 JST 2003,
> with the following error (patch cannot be applied);
I think it's you :) That patc
Is it only with me?
XFree86-4-Server cannot be compiled on recent -current,
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Sat Mar 22 13:21:34 JST 2003,
with the following error (patch cannot be applied);
>>>
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-Server-4.3.0_2
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to l
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 02:06:45AM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> -CURRENT still isn't for production, but more bugs fixed and now
> it more stable, then one month ago.
> Please update your system and try to reproduce your bug.
OK, my bug is gone when I update -CURRENT to:
FreeBSD rincewind 5.
Hi
I receive panics when running this test program. The system was cvsup'ed
and built on Mar 21. I hope the attached trace is helpful.
--
Regards
Peter
As always the organisation disavows knowledge of this email
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
Vincent Poy wrote:
> I've recently went from a February 6, 2003 -CURRENT to a March 8,
> 2003 -CURRENT and for whatever reason, the stuff that used to work
> installed from ports all broke with Bad System Call (core dump), has
> anyone else experienced this problem since what happened to all
I've recently went from a February 6, 2003 -CURRENT to a March 8,
2003 -CURRENT and for whatever reason, the stuff that used to work
installed from ports all broke with Bad System Call (core dump), has
anyone else experienced this problem since what happened to all the
backwards compatibili
In the last episode (Mar 22), Steve Kargl said:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:39:51PM -0600, Anti wrote:
> > pentium3 would be better than pentiumpro on a p4 i think...
>
> I know pentium4 produces some strange code and I know my
> system is quite stable with pentiumpro. I've never tested
> what h
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hello,
no luck here either:
http://www.opensound.com/readme/README.SBLive.html
-> o EMU Wavetable MIDI synthesizer not yet supported
The only thing that is (partially) working seems to be ALSA.
Regards,
Julian
On 22-Mar-2003 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PRO
I've got 3 of these so far (2 on alpha, 1 on i386) since updating to
current as of 17 March.
panic: softdep_disk_io_initiation: read
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
db> trace
Debugger(c041df8a,c04935e0,c0430d64,d7a50b20,1) at Debugger+0x54
panic(c0430d6
On Mar 22, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
> > EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
> On and off, as far as I can tell. If you want MIDI right now, take a l
On Saturday 22 March 2003 16:15, Peter Schultz wrote:
> OSS is on the outs. New applications that are ALSA only will soon be
> common, won't they?
No. In fact, there is quite an explosion in multimedia middleware projects
right now and people are having heated discussions in other places which
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:39:51PM -0600, Anti wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:28:46 -0800
> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pentium 4 is definitely broken on 5.x. Perhaps, we should remove
> > the footshooting.
> >
> > --- bsd.cpu.mk.orig Sat Mar 22 10:23:42 2003
> > +++ bsd.cp
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:28:46 -0800
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pentium 4 is definitely broken on 5.x. Perhaps, we should remove
> the footshooting.
>
> --- bsd.cpu.mk.orig Sat Mar 22 10:23:42 2003
> +++ bsd.cpu.mk Sat Mar 22 10:27:11 2003
> @@ -62,7 +62,9 @@
> . elif ${CPUTYP
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:14:43PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Till Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I now know the thing that makes it break.
> >
> > cc -O2 -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -c /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_pow.c
> > works fine!
> > cc -O0 -pipe -march=pentium4 -c /usr/src/lib/msun/sr
Peter Schultz wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina
Having a p
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get
you MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.
Not so. ALSA is poorly designed (there is no hardware ab
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
I think you wouldn't really do anyone a favour, including the ALSA
folks, if you went and made a port right now. The ALSA project is still
not at 1.00 status and still quite in-flux
Hi all!
When I read cdroms with fbsd 5.0, the following message appears in the
console very often (it seems to happen with every cdrom I try):
>acd0: READ_BIG command timeout - resetting
>ata0: resetting devices ..
>done
It is repeated indefinitely and I can't kill -9 the process that is trying
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina
Having a port of ALSA would sure r
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get
you MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.
Not so. ALSA is poorly designed (there is no hardware ab
On Friday 21 March 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
> EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
On and off, as far as I can tell. If you want MIDI right now, take a look at
what 4Front Technologies
On Saturday 22 March 2003 14:52, Peter Schultz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative
> > EMU10K1 based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Julian Stecklina
>
> Having a port of ALSA would s
Hello,
> Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
> MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
Quote from this page:
"Known bugs
- MIDI on SB live drive not working properly."
Seems MIDI is not a great priority anymore. But I would certainly greet a
new sound a
Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get
> you MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
>
> This can easily happen if we get behind a developer.
Not so. ALSA is poorly designed (there is no hardware abstraction
layer below
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
just out of curiosity: Is someone working in MIDI support for Creative EMU10K1
based sound cards (aka Soundblaster Live!) ?
Regards,
Julian Stecklina
Having a port of ALSA would sure round out 5.2 nicely, and would get you
MIDI support: http://www.alsa-project.org/
[moving to -ports, I'm not sure it's a -current issue]
"Alastair G. Hogge" wrote:
> On Saturday, 22 March 2003 22:17, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 20:38, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> > > I've been able to portupgrade my XFree86-4.2.1 system[1] to 4.3.0 expect
> > > the 4.3.0 clien
Well it was Xft.
I feel stupid, sorry for wasting peoples time.
Anyways I think I recall what happened, during the portupgrade I was playing
around with X and caused a system crash. This may have happened during the
Xft removal/upgrade stage of portupgrade.
All is well now, thanks Daniel
To U
On Saturday, 22 March 2003 22:17, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 20:38, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> > I've been able to portupgrade my XFree86-4.2.1 system[1] to 4.3.0 expect
> > the 4.3.0 clients port. I've tried completely removing and building it
> > manuly thru "make install" but
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 20:38, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> I've been able to portupgrade my XFree86-4.2.1 system[1] to 4.3.0 expect the
> 4.3.0 clients port. I've tried completely removing and building it manuly
> thru "make install" but I get the same.
> -DMITSHM -DXFT -DXRENDER -c do_text.c
> do_
Hello,
I've been able to portupgrade my XFree86-4.2.1 system[1] to 4.3.0 expect the
4.3.0 clients port. I've tried completely removing and building it manuly
thru "make install" but I get the same.
The log from the build can be found here:
http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/jhogge/log
But here is th
38 matches
Mail list logo
