In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Simon 'portlint
' Schubert" writes:
>> These files, conventionally called /dev/fd/0, /dev/fd/1, /dev/fd/2,
>>and so on, refer to files accessible through file descriptors. If file
>>descriptor n is open, these two system calls have the same effect:
>>fd
Hello,
Starting pppd(8) on yesterday -current produces a panic:
miss# gdb kernel.84 -k vmcore.84
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it u
On 11 Mar 2003 03:52:18 +0200
Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
> noticed an interesting problem: I am using FreeBSD 5.0-p4 and GCC 3.2.1
> and if I use "CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird" and "CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -m3dn
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:53:40AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> cd /usr/lib/libpthreads
> make
> make install
> This installs a libkse which, when we are happy with it will become
> libpthreads, but until then it has this special name..
>
> get some test threads programs and link with -lkse
> r
Hello list.
Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
noticed an interesting problem: I am using FreeBSD 5.0-p4 and GCC 3.2.1
and if I use "CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird" and "CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -m3dnow
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe", ezm3 refuses to compile AT ALL and even
though
Sizi anadolunun 7 harikası seçimine katılmaya çağırıyoruz.
7 harika seçiminde halen aday belirleme sürecindeyiz.
Seçime katılmasını istediğiniz adaylarınızı
http://www.7woa.com adresinden bizlere iletebilirsiniz.
Saygılarımızla
www.7woa.com
Not : Bu mail size tek bir defalık 7 wonders
Lately Larry Rosenman told:
> --On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 00:38:08 +0100 Poul-Henning Kamp
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier
> > writes:
> >> Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes are not being created as they
> >> should.
> >>
> >> Is this a ba
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 00:38:08 +0100 Poul-Henning Kamp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier
writes:
I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2)
err
< There is no standard, other than Tenth Edition and Plan 9. Most
> programs which use it expect it to behave like one or the other.
s/one or the other/that/
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
< said:
> Has anybody found out what the standards conformant thing is for /dev/fd ?
There is no standard, other than Tenth Edition and Plan 9. Most
programs which use it expect it to behave like one or the other.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier writes:
>I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
>
>For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
>
>diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2)
>
>errors out with:
>
>diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
>diff: /dev/fd/62: No suc
On Tue, 2003/03/11 at 08:43:46 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I
On 10-Mar-2003 Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
>> >> b
Hi,
>
> Write cacheing is automatically enabled if tagged queueing is enabled
> and supported by the disk, so I doubt you're seeing any improvement at
> all.
I must admit: My statements are based on experience with SCSI Tagged Queuing
and SCSI Write Cache. I hope I'm correct if I assume that th
I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2)
errors out with:
diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory
Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes are
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>
> >> Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
> >> before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting ad
unsubscribe freebsd-current-digest
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Is there any example code available that just tests (a "proof of
> > concept"-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
>
> See src/tools/KSE/ksetest.
also the library is mostly working
so:
cd /usr/li
Thus spake Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there any example code available that just tests (a "proof of
> concept"-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
See src/tools/KSE/ksetest.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messa
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:01:55 -0800
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cfowler> Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
> cfowler> of all mail going out?
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section4.html#4.20
What about http://www.geocities.com/sbmilbur
On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
>> before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting address to be
>> ../../../kern/kern_fork.c:395
>> which is in the inn
On 09-Mar-2003 Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> I'n not shure if this is still the place to drop these???
> I haven't seen may off these lately on the list...
>
> Found in my dmesg of yesterday, system is now 5 days up:
>
> /usr/src5/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:243: could sleep with "buf queue lock" locked
cfowler> Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
cfowler> of all mail going out?
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section4.html#4.20
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read
> and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and
> `#endif' can be recognized).
I thought that the other discussion had concluded that:
#if 0
...
#else
Or:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> In , I see:
>
> #if __GNUC__
> #warning "No user-serviceable parts inside."
> #endif
>
> Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
> #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files?
Yes. It is a preprocessor directive specific the GCC preprocessor.
This was discussed in gre
Hello,
Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
of all mail going out?
Thanks,
Chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Can
> anyone update this file to include "NONE" option?
Do you mean you want it to default to "NONE", or do you mean
that you want the option documented in this file? If the former,
then it's not going to happe
Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many programs (from ports too) defines _ISOC99_SOURCE to get C99
> functions, but we don't sense this define currently. Here is the fix for
> review:
Cool. I didn't realize there was an existing precedence, or I would
have used it.
> --- cdefs.h.
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
> write cache and ata tags.
>
> My question is:
>
> It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
>
> I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
> (wi
Is there any example code available that just tests (a "proof of
concept"-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
--
Ashes to ashes, DOS to DOS
ivoras @ fer.hr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hello.
For a long time with FreeBSD 4.X we ran and still run a bunch of
diskless stations, X11 Terminals, some special workstations and
now a growing system with several nodes for usage as PVM.
Now I want to switch to FreeBSD 5.0 and run into massive problems.
I searched for similar problems in
Hi,
I have a 2U Rackmount system that I have inherited. This box has a
standard Intel RC440BX Desktop Motherboard in it. The actual chassis
covers the whole board so that none off the expansion slots or on board
connectors are visible. There is a network connector on the back off the
chassis that
On Monday 10 March 2003 17:28, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Jun Su <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To help myself more easily check the kernel dump, I added two new
> > command. One is ps, the other is kldstat. I know we can print the kernel
> > data manually to get the same information. I still th
Hello,
> Here the messages that appears in console: The panic appears randomly
> after the boot , it can be an hour as can be 3 or more hours .
Could you please try to upgrade to -CURRENT?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
Matthias Schuendehuette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
> and working.
> (The performace gain of WriteCache and TaggedQueuing is more or less the
> same, the combination of both adds less than 10% of performance and you
> shou
Jun Su <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To help myself more easily check the kernel dump, I added two new command. One
> is ps, the other is kldstat. I know we can print the kernel data manually to
> get the same information. I still think this is useful. This can help the
> newbies to get the info
37 matches
Mail list logo
