On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Brad Hughes wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I have a question, when i try to plugin my eUSB SmartMedia USB
> adapter, umass doesnt recognize it. Darius over at #freebsdhelp@efnet
> suggested me to send a mail to the questions/current mailing lists.
> Thanks t
At 10:33 PM -0800 2002/12/10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
DISKS
FILESYSTEMS
NETWORKING
DAEMON
LOGIN
DISKS would be things that are needed to get the disks in order to start
getting filesystems mounted (vinum, ccd, raidframe and friends). It may
be a superflous step.
FILESYSTEMS and NETWORKING
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I'd like to think about really sitting down and overhauling the rc.d
> system after 5.0 is branched. I think that it's reasonable to say we
> should not try to be compatible with NetBSD except for keeping a common
> rc.subr and major initialization catag
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:47:54PM -0800, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:23:18PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> >
> > Ideally, ntpd should require NETWORKING and that should solve all problems.
> > The real problem is that routed is included with DAEMON, not NETWORKING. I
> > thi
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:23:18PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> Ideally, ntpd should require NETWORKING and that should solve all problems.
> The real problem is that routed is included with DAEMON, not NETWORKING. I
> think that's the real problem and judging that routed is in /sbin, we could
cvsup as of 5 minutes ago
make buildworld -DNOCLEAN -DNOGAMES -DNO_FORTRAN
===> share/man
===> share/man/man1
===> share/man/man3
===> share/man/man4
gzip -cn /usr/src/share/man/man4/mac_ifoff.4 > mac_ifoff.4.gz
gzip -cn /usr/src/share/man/man4/mac_none.4 > mac_none.4.gz
make: don't know how to ma
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Are you sure you have all the bits in your kernel that are needed ?
i.e
device umass
device scbus
device da
device pass
In mine, I have
# usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), Intel(0x), rev
1.00
# ps xauww | egrep cda
root 36761 0.0 0.3 1884 1452 p4 D 7:25PM 0:00.01
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xmcd/bin-FreeBSD_5-i386/cda -batch -dev /dev/cd0 on
# strace -p 36761
ioctl(0, CAMGETPASSTHRU
(...hangs forever and won't die with kill -9...)
This device is:
cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0
Hey everyone,
I have a question, when i try to plugin my eUSB SmartMedia USB
adapter, umass doesnt recognize it. Darius over at #freebsdhelp@efnet
suggested me to send a mail to the questions/current mailing lists.
Thanks to him :). When i plug in my Adapter, in my dmesg it states:
ugen0: SCM
Hi,
Some notes on my upgrade / fresh install experiences with 5.0-RC1.
1) Binary Upgrade doesn't recognize existing swap partitions
Original configuration, Athlon 1.2, IDE, 4.7 + Gnome2 etal.
I booted the install CD, selected 'upgrade', ignored the warnings
and proceeded to the disk label menu
Çäðàâñòâóéòå!
Ðàáîòà â ñåòè äëÿ Âàñ
http://www.getjob.boom.ru
Èçâèíèòå çà áåñïîêîéñòâî.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:50:14PM -0800, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:01:24PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > On another note, I thought the patch a bit excessive. Here, I just added
> > BEFORE: ntpd to routed. OTOH, it seems that patch did a bit more.
>
> It's not excess
>
> I decided to re-install RC1 with some changes that might make getting
> core dumps easier. Now I get the acpi crash (previously reported)
> before I can get a good start on the install.
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to set up the ISOs to not use acpi so that
> acpi bugs don't block installat
I decided to re-install RC1 with some changes that might make getting
core dumps easier. Now I get the acpi crash (previously reported)
before I can get a good start on the install.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to set up the ISOs to not use acpi so that
acpi bugs don't block installation?
Is there
At Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:00:02 + (UTC),
Brian J. McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.) Doing a Custom install with a custom distribution set, I receive, on the
> first console:
>
> S:21494970 = (ff/ff/ff)
> E:2988-899 = (ff/ef/ff)
>
> S:29880900 = (ff/ff/ff)
> E:78172289 = (ff/ef/ff)
>
> 1
> I wonder what is it trying to do with zip drives, that causes
> it to hang? Maybe it chokes on removable direct-access SCSI devices?
I had the same problem with 5.0-DP2, except it was a SCSI zip drive. I
solved it by removing the zip SCSI card (mfg. by adaptec I believe) and
trying the install
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:22:08AM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> I think keeping our boot scripts the same is kind of a pipe dream. I think
> we should keep our rc.subr the same, but for individual scripts, I think we
> should just go our own way.
I can see how keeping every we possibly can the
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:01:24PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> On another note, I thought the patch a bit excessive. Here, I just added
> BEFORE: ntpd to routed. OTOH, it seems that patch did a bit more.
It's not excessive. It's the correct solution.
Your solution solves your specific probl
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:16PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I will bring my DS10 to the latest & greatest -current and see what it
does for me. Stay tuned (till tomorrow at least ;)
W/
> I just upgraded my UP1000 from 4.7-stable to 5.0.
>
> Only weird thing left is the console seems to dr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2002-12-10 at 02:30:14 James Satterfield wrote:
>> I tried booting a 5.0-RC1 CD on it. However, sysinstall always
>> hangs at "probing devices"
> Unplug the Zip drive. I've had the same problem with sysinstall and
> a USB zip drive.
That fixed it
On 10-Dec-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 10-Dec-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > This is where it faulted for some reason or another. It was running
>> > > a registered interrupt handler. Do you
I installed 5.0-RC1 this morning on my IBM ThinkPad 600E. The problems
I see are the same as I saw on DP2.
1. PCcards are not seen. I get the message:
pccard1: Card has no functions!
cbb1: PC Card card activation failed
This has been reported on other ThinkPads and is being addressed,
Çäðàâñòâóéòå!
Ðàáîòà â ñåòè äëÿ Âàñ
http://www.getjob.boom.ru
Èçâèíèòå çà áåñïîêîéñòâî.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:02:14PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> >
> > > 3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
> > > particular one bothering me a
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10-Dec-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This is where it faulted for some reason or another. It was running
> > > a registered interrupt handler. Do you have any kernel modules in this
> > > system?
> >
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Alan L. Cox wrote:
> Does your kernel include the following?
>
> Revision 1.200 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Nov 17
> 09:33:00 2002 UTC (8 days, 21 hours ago) by jeff
> Branch: MAIN
> Changes since 1.199: +4 -4 lines
> Diff to previous 1.199 (colored)
>
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Robert Faulds wrote:
> Did you get a chance to test a SK 9843 on current? Can you reproduce
> the panic's I'm getting? I have the same PHY as you mentioned in the
> last message I received from you.
I did verify that the card doesn't attach on -CURRENT .. I think it was
chocke
under 4-STABLE I get the up-till-now behavior where
a df -k shows you amd's pid, pid@hostname:/mountpoint
under 5-CURRENT it won't show up unless I type df -ak.
is the behavior in 5.0 correct?
df's man page says:
"-a Show all mount points, including those that
were mounted with the MNT_IG
On 10 Dec 2002 16:02:14 -0500
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Evo isn't a C++ application. I haven't seen any build logs for it,
> either. I'm doing a build on my i386 machine now just to be sure.
I built it a couple of days ago on my 5.0-RC system, works okay.
flynn@christ
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
>
> > 3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
> > particular one bothering me at the moment. Is this a known issues
> > that the 5.0 compiler won't build al
I just installed RC#0. It appears to be as good as some of the DP versions. I
haven't done much with it yet, but a couple of minor sysinstall issues that
are ugly.
1.) It appears, during install that devfs gets mounted on /dev twice. It
doesn't appear to impact anything, its just an oddity.
2.) D
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> 3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
> particular one bothering me at the moment. Is this a known issues
> that the 5.0 compiler won't build all packages?
Yes.
Kris
msg48472/pgp0.pgp
Description
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> > fault virtual address = 0xc01e8d
> > fault code = supervisor write, page not present
> > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc045dc80
> > stack pointer = 0x10:0xd536dce4
> > frame
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> If this mobo will always
> require a custom .AML file I want to commit the one I have and start a
> table of mobo/BIOS's and the custom .AML files we offer.
Thank you, we really need this!
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
> This is 100% reproducible with a top-of-tree kernel, but didn't happen
> with Wednesday's sources:
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> fault virtual address = 0xc01e8d
> fault code = supervisor write, page not present
> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc045dc80
> s
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:21:46PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:45:13AM +0900, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> > >Here is the ACPI DSDT dump (w/o acpi.ko loaded) for this machine.
> > Try DSDT override using following AML, please.
> >
> > http : //takawata.st.wakwak.ne.jp/o
On 10-Dec-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This is where it faulted for some reason or another. It was running
>> a registered interrupt handler. Do you have any kernel modules in this
>> system?
>
> Not that were loaded at the time of the panic.
Had
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 05:52, Vasyl S. Smirnov wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> One more strange thing I've just discovered about sshd - two
> example ssh sessions:
>
> 1.
> > ssh nostromo
> Password:
> Connection closed by 10.100.76.33
>
> (and the same sig 11/fatal messages on the console)
>
> 2.
> >
Vasyl S. Smirnov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:59:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Can you check the core dump for backtrace and send that?
sysctl kern.sugid_coredump=1
sysctl kern.corefile=/tmp/%N.core (or somewhere else wri
I just upgraded my UP1000 from 4.7-stable to 5.0.
Only weird thing left is the console seems to drop a lot of characters
just after syscons takes over.
I see this on console:
<...>
ppc0: interrupting at ISA irq 7
sc0: on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0>
net.inet.udp.blackhole: 0
Hi,
> Since rescent -CURRENT is stable enough, I have the chance to find
> out remaining pcm problem. My MP box no more has double fatal fault
> and turns into random sleep. The random sleep happens after pcm having
> its own problem.
>
> uname -av is
> FreeBSD cartier.home 5.0-CURRENT Fr
Hi again.
One more strange thing I've just discovered about sshd - two
example ssh sessions:
1.
> ssh nostromo
Password:
Connection closed by 10.100.76.33
(and the same sig 11/fatal messages on the console)
2.
> ssh nostromo
Password:
Password:
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
[an
Hello,
You need to prepare a kernel dump. Pardon the self-promotion:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/03/21/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/04/04/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
With a full bug report, we can address this.
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:43:55PM +0
Greetings,
Congratulations on RC1! I've found an issue! :-)
I just upgraded my ASUS LC3800 portable to 5.0-RC1 from 5.0-DP2. The
new kernel panics shortly after booting up and drops into the debugger.
The messages look something like this:
Fatal trap 12
Page fault in kernel mode fault virtua
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:43:50PM -0800, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>The following patch should solve your problem. However,
>it's only a partial solution. It fixes the case for ntpd
>and ntpdate but not for other network daemons like rpcbind, which
still get
>started _before_ t
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:43:50PM -0800, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>
> The following patch should solve your problem. However,
> it's only a partial solution. It fixes the case for ntpd
> and ntpdate but not for other network daemons like rpcbind, which still get
> started _before_ the routing daemons
Scott Long wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:37:20AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:37:20AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> Mark Murray wrote:
> >>I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
> >>basic issues right off.
> >>
> >>1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
> >>definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for now since I'll
do some more testing tonight and it's already been raised
> I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
> basic issues right off.
>
> 1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
> definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for now since I'll
> do some more testing tonight and it's already been raised by some
> Just ran tuxracer without a problem, so i can recommend people with
> problems to try using the nvidia agp driver, seems as if it worked for
> me :)
Haha, that's funny, it wouldn't work for most games using the nvidia
driver for me, I had to switch to using FreeBSD's agpgart.
Ken
To Unsubscri
÷ Mon, 09.12.2002, × 13:55, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> I have already filled http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=45913
>
> Lucent WaveLan Orinoco card (driver wi) stops working with latest
> current (last I have tried RC)
>
> Playing with problem I have found that WaveLan probl
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for now since I'll
do some more testing tonight and it's already been raised by someone
else any
Just ran tuxracer without a problem, so i can recommend people with
problems to try using the nvidia agp driver, seems as if it worked for me :)
Jan Malina
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>For some reason i can't get the nvidia drivers working with my system (had
>them working under 4.7-STABLE, but they refuse to wrok with 5.0-RC). Last
>synced with current this weekend, and nothing worthwile has been added
last
>time i checked.
>Now the problem is that when I start x, everything s
"Gernot A. Weber" wrote:
>
> > This is a FAQ and has been answered several times already. But I'll
> > answer it again.
>
Nonsense. The whole nvidia situation is a can of worms with a number of
answers to any given question. For example, stable is different than
-current. Some mobo's just don'
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, leafy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:06:21 +0800
> From: leafy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Confused by mpd and ipnat
>
> I run -current and decided to try kernel PPPoE. I installed mpd from ports
> which ran fine. After installing ipnat, I setup
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is where it faulted for some reason or another. It was running
> a registered interrupt handler. Do you have any kernel modules in this
> system?
Not that were loaded at the time of the panic.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Uns
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:54:00PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> This just means the nvidia driver is buggy and could result in corrupted
> data and kernel crashes eventually. However, the driver is only "buggy"
> on 5.0 because 5.0 has different locking requirements than 4.x and the
> driver was w
61 matches
Mail list logo
