On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > * Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
> > >
> > > Yes, this one seems to work.
> >
> > Hold on.. now remote hosts _see_ the ext2fs share, but m
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > > Can this be patched by doing some subtitutions in the files that use the
> > > "old" mount syscall? Or is it more hairy than that?
> >
> > Can you try the attached patch and tell me if it works ?
>
> T
Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote:
> > does the problem still occur if you add in 'using namespace std'?
>
> Thanks. That also fixed it.
Yeah. Just remember that the "standard" namespace isn't.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
Hi, everybody,
Have somebody use the "/usr/src/tools/KSE/ksetest/ksetest"? I want to
test about "KSE". I cvsuped my box a few days ago. my "kern_thread.c"
version is 1.66.
When I use the ksetest, the box is crashed.
the information as follow:
Current# ./ksetest
main() : 0x804c000
eip -> 0x280a
Try adding hw.pccard.cis_debug=1 to /boot/loader.conf and let me know
the results.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
My Thinkpad 600X doesn't recognize any PC cards since I installed
5.0-DP2. PC cards worked fine on it under -CURRENT back in February
(before the NEWCARD merge and rc_ng) and they worked fine under -STABLE
since then. I haven't been tracking -CURRENT since February, so maybe I
missed something im
[to follow-up on what I said in a different thread...]
On my 5.0-dp2 system, if I ignore /usr/local and /usr/ports, it
looks like the following files installed by -dp2 are perl scripts:
/usr/bin/mmroff
/usr/bin/afmtodit
/usr/sbin/adduser
/usr/sbin/rmuser
/usr/share/examples/cvs/contri
At 7:06 PM -0800 11/27/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> My /usr/sbin/adduser, updated on Nov/23/2002 21:58 JST, does
> not call pw command. It adds account to /etc/master.passwd and
> invokes 'pwd_mkdb'.
>
See 'sub new_users' function in /usr/sbin/adduser.
There are two "a
Sergey V Golitzyn wrote:
Hello, i have a little problem with APM (Adv. Power Managment)
I migrate from 4.7-STABLE to 5.0-CURRENT version. But in process i have lost
apm0 device in "dmesg".
Device /dev/apm is in, but apmd daemon does not start cozz /dev/apmctl device
not exist.
kozaczek# kldloa
In message <002501c298d3$63c3c150$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew
Emmerton" w
rites:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > , Garret
> > t Rooney writes:
> > > > The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
> > > >
> > > > #include
> > > >
> > > > int main()
> > > > {
> > > > cout
Hello, i have a little problem with APM (Adv. Power Managment)
I migrate from 4.7-STABLE to 5.0-CURRENT version. But in process i have lost
apm0 device in "dmesg".
Device /dev/apm is in, but apmd daemon does not start cozz /dev/apmctl device
not exist.
Tell me please how to modify this strings
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> , Garret
> t Rooney writes:
> > > The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
> > >
> > > #include
> > >
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > > cout<<"Hello World\n";
> > > }
> > >
> > > ... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
> >
Barkley Vowk wrote:
I've got a notebook running current, and I've got a horde of problems I
need some help fixing...
1) ACPI lets me control fans and cpu speed nicely, and the notebook will
suspend nicely, and it almost resumes properly. When the notebook wakes up
it comes back on the network and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, Garret
t Rooney writes:
> > The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
> >
> > #include
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > cout<<"Hello World\n";
> > }
> >
> > ... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
> >
> > cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Craig Rodrigues writes:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:48:00PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Gro
> up wrote:
> > I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
> > Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:48:00PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote:
> I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
> Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
> the mailing lists, I haven't found a solution to this.
>
> The f
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include
int main()
{
cout<<"Hello World\n";
}
... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo.cc
foo.cc: In function `int main()':
foo.cc:5: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
foo.cc:5:
I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
the mailing lists, I haven't found a solution to this.
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include
int main()
{
cout<<"Hello
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
> : > - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
>
> And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A large
> component of the decision to remove it from the base was the high
> incidence of security problems with the original code. That, coupled
>
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> Hm, this is weird. I'm sure I have dumped an UFS2 filesystem earlier and
> it worked. Now I get similar error messages as you. Yes, I'm absolutely
> sure that the filesystem was UFS2 - played with extattrctl on it, checked
> it with dumpfs and was not ab
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
> > I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily.
> > I had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to
> > test Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
>
> I've notic
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> > I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and
> > did not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from
> > Nov 24th.
>
> Sure you dumped an UFS2 filesystem?
>
> Here's my try:
>
> root@current - /root
> 10
Michal Mertl wrote:
> I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily. I
> had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to test
> Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
>
> After the first lock-up I tried 'while(1);tar xzf ports.tgz;
I've got a notebook running current, and I've got a horde of problems I
need some help fixing...
1) ACPI lets me control fans and cpu speed nicely, and the notebook will
suspend nicely, and it almost resumes properly. When the notebook wakes up
it comes back on the network and the keyboard works p
On Saturday 30 November 2002 23:24, you wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Manfred Antar wrote:
> > I guess dump is not ready for UFS2
>
> I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and
> did not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from
> Nov 24th.
Sure you dumpe
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > No, libc_r doesn't properly handle flock. Usually, all syscalls
> > that take file descriptors as arguments honor the non-blocking
> > mode of the file if set. I guess flock(2) doesn't and has its
> > own option to the operation argument (LOCK_NB).
> >
> > I hacked libc_
I recently upgraded a Dell Lattitude C600 from some version
of -stable after 4.3 to 5.0-current. I first upgraded it
to 4.7-stable, then to 5.0-current. I followed the instructions
at the end of src/UPDATING pretty much to the letter.
I haven't recompiled any applications for 5.0, so they're
all
Brian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
> >do record locking in the shared memory segment.
>
> Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
> the SysV shared memory. However f
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:40:59PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > ===> etc/sendmail
> > rm -f freefall.cf
> > (cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail && m4
>-D_CF_DIR_=/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/
>/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 freefall
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:35:32PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I get this when building 5.0 under 4.x, for the purposes of installing
> into a temporary directory. Any ideas?
>
> Kris
>
> ===> etc/sendmail
> rm -f freefall.cf
> (cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail && m4
>-D_CF_DIR_=/local0/src-5
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
From the next branch on -current, it is my intent to not install
BSD labels anymore, but switch to GPT instead, (possibly encapsulated
in an BSD MBR slice for legacy systems).
Do you mean this GPT:
http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/tech/storage/GPT_FAQ.asp
or are you s
I get this when building 5.0 under 4.x, for the purposes of installing
into a temporary directory. Any ideas?
Kris
===> etc/sendmail
rm -f freefall.cf
(cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail && m4
-D_CF_DIR_=/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/
/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../..
I'm getting this on several of my alphas. Any ideas? The traceback
and panic message is weird.
Kris
axp4# gdb -k kernel.debug vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to ch
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Manfred Antar wrote:
> I guess dump is not ready for UFS2
I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and did
not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from Nov 24th.
--
-- wrzask --= v =-- Winfried --=-- GG# 3838383 --=-- JS500-RIPE -
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michal
Mertl writes:
>Subject says it all.
Fixed in md.c revision 1.74 - this was discussed here a few days
ago, but I was just waiting for approval to commit the fix.
Ian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 01:08:51PM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
> to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
>
> I did a search and tried some syntax like "0" for the irq etc. but no
> way to p
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:36:21 -0800
> From: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: corrupted UFS2 label after ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.198
>
...
> Once you have
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>isn't it about time we got away from puting the bootblocks in a
>filesystem partition?
I actually reached that conclusion back when we realized that the UFS2
bootblocks did not fit the 8k magic zone.
>From the next branch on -current, it
isn't it about time we got away from puting the bootblocks in a
filesystem partition?
"Here, all these planets^H^H^H^H^H^Hblocks are yours, to do as you
please,
except the first 16 blocks.. attempt no landing there"
(or however it went).. (Appologies to Mr. Clark).
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk Mc
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:44:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: corrupted UFS2 label after ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.198
Hi,
after cvsupping a kernel wit
Your deadlock should now be fixed.
Kirk McKusick
=-=-=-=-=
From: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:27:12 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
mckusick2002/11/29 2
At 10:56 AM 11/30/2002 -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
>>
>> First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
>> for my tiny /var-partition and after that
Ok, I got another one. DDB output attached. I did all kinds of operations
to trigger it - had 3 md mounted from the same dir, in 2 of them doing my
ports.tgz torture test and in root file system I had 'find . -inum
1231231' running. One find finished succesfully but then it finally
locked-up.
> Y
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:43:38 +
From: Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: newfs chokes, cores, & dies if inode density too high;
patch attached
In-
At 10:56 AM 11/30/2002 -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
>>
>> First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
>> for my tiny /var-partition and after that
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
> I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily.
> I had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to
> test Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
I've noticed that chroot() environments
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
Including rwatson because of the thread on hackers@.
Sorry for follow-up to myself.
> Recently there was a discussion about jails on some freebsd list. Someone
> recommended vnconfig(8)ed file-backed disk for jail file systems. Terry
> wrote there are pro
Subject says it all.
I wanted to make vnode-backed md(4) and forgot to specify size, thas it
after 'touch mdfile;mdconfig -a -t vnode -f mdfile' mdconfig process can't
be killed. It's wchan ('ps axO wchan|grep mdconf') is mddest.
--
Michal Mertl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Brian Smith wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > >Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
> > >do record locking in the shared memory segment.
> >
> > Ok, I did this,
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Brian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> >Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
> >do record locking in the shared memory segment.
>
> Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
> the SysV
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > On 2002-11-28 17:00, "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
> > > during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
> > > chan
I have no problems at all running KDE on DP2.
Did you load a sound driver? The complaints about /dev/dsp not existing seem
to indicate that you didn't load a sound driver.
You might want to check your XF86Config file again, because I'm sure you can
find an explanation for the default resolutio
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
>do record locking in the shared memory segment.
Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
the SysV shared memory. However flock() has the same problem
as
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2002-11-28 17:00, "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
> > > during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
> > > changes the time two hours b
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> On 2002-11-28 17:00, "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
> > during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
> > changes the time two hours because of the TZ). No message fro
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
>
> First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
> for my tiny /var-partition and after that it dumps core while trying to
> dump my not so tiny /usr part
Recently there was a discussion about jails on some freebsd list. Someone
recommended vnconfig(8)ed file-backed disk for jail file systems. Terry
wrote there are problems with it. I liked the idea and played with
mdconfig(8)ed devices on current. Terry was right - I can easily make the
system deadl
* Mitsuru IWASAKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Iwasaki-san,
list members,
> > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [FAN_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
> > > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_NOT_FOUND
>
> I think that this was caused by the following spec changes.
> From CHANGES.txt:
FWIW, I recently build KDE3 on a 5.0-DP2 notebook.
I just copied the /etc/X11/XF86Config from the working 4.7-Stable partition,
kld-loaded the pcm sound, and voilà, everything works fine.
do you know if your XF86Config is correct ?
have you loaded the sound driver ?
Cheers,
TfH
I rebuilt the whole of KDE on DP2 (upto date as of a couple of days
ago). Apart from me growing older in the process nothing worked well,
despite using the same configuration as on 4.7.
- It starts but no sound arises
- The mouse moves, responds to clicks sometimes, but when I bring up the
menu and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kirk McKusick wr
ites:
>You will have to ask Puol-Henning Kamp, but I do not believe that
>he has yet put together a bootstrap for the i386 platform that can
>boot from a UFS2 filesystem. As such, I believe that you are
>required to have a UFS1 root on the i386 at
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:44:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to use an usb modem under freebsd. It is detected during boot.
> My system is current as of yesterday sources. Dmesg output is attached.
>
> Modem is recognized as /dev/ugen0 and there is another node /
Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Ah
> No wonder, I tried editing the /sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile
> to enable UFS2 bootblock but then disklabel complained that
> boot2 was too big. I will have to revert to UFS1
> Thanks
> Manfred
>
> You have hit upon the exa
It seems Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Soeren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to get this into 5.0 (I know its late, but life's tough)
> >
> > This brings ATA support to the PC98 arch will all bells and whistles.
>
>
> > --- sys/conf/files 2
64 matches
Mail list logo
