panic in getnewvnode

2002-10-02 Thread Danny Braniss
there is something fishy going on :-) with latest current, the tests are run on a diskless host, and just after booting, this is what i do: newfs /dev/ad0s2a mount /dev/ad0s2a /mnt-root cd /mnt-root rsh dev -n dump 0f - /c/4| restore rf - panic: vn_finished_write:

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Oct, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > >> /freebsd/current/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1307: could sleep with "filedesc structure" >locked from /freebsd/current/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:959 >> >> at me and freezes badly at some point (no breaking into ddb possible). >> T

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

2002-10-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Oct, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Running into an odd (and apparently recent) problem involving rmdir(2) and > > NFS. I have a diskless box started using pxeboot: NFS /, MFS /var, MFS > > /tmp, recent 5.0-CURRENT. Attempt to rmdir /usr/local (on NF

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
> > Here is my hints file (which has not changed in at least 6 months) > > Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata > attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID > in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi > atta

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

2002-10-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Oct, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Running into an odd (and apparently recent) problem involving rmdir(2) and > > NFS. I have a diskless box started using pxeboot: NFS /, MFS /var, MFS > > /tmp, recent 5.0-CURRENT. Attempt to rmdir /usr/local (on NF

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

2002-10-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Oct, Robert Watson wrote: > > Running into an odd (and apparently recent) problem involving rmdir(2) and > NFS. I have a diskless box started using pxeboot: NFS /, MFS /var, MFS > /tmp, recent 5.0-CURRENT. Attempt to rmdir /usr/local (on NFS) results in > NFS hanging. It appears to send

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes: >the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the >CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom. Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD devices. Can you please try this patch: http://phk.freebsd.dk

GEOM

2002-10-02 Thread Carl Schmidt
GEOM is working so far. I can mount a cd-rom without problems and permissions are fine. `dmesg' output follows. After that is my kernel configuration. There is one problem, not related to GEOM (it's been going on for at least a month), which follows: whenever I reboot the laptop from FreeBSD b

Re: aic7890/91 controller

2002-10-02 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
> Me neither but my 2642 additionally only boots from channel B. Meaning it hangs if you attempt to boot from channel B? I really have no feel for what the actual failure mode is yet. Do we get timeouts? No devices are seen? What does a verbose boot print out about the controller and its term

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

2002-10-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 20:51:40 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Please back it out or do it properly! > > this IS the backout.. it's now how it was before, including in 4.x I mean - back out this backout - it damage 5.0 FP binaries. I don't care about 4.x -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ac

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

2002-10-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 20:50:52 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Please back it out or do it properly! > > did you recompile the apps and the libraries? 1st try: I got signal 6 with old, but 5.0 binaries dynamically linked with m3 libraries. 2nd try: I recompile whole cvsup, getting very -cu

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

2002-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > cause bug: > > > revision 1.539 > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +10 -

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

2002-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > cause bug: > > > revision 1.539 > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +10 -

Re: laptop panicked [with trace]

2002-10-02 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-02 ] [ Subjecte: laptop panicked [with trace] ] > With today's -current. No X11, two ttyv0 in use -- cvs updating, the > other -- playing hack(6): This is known; A temporary fix is to modify the part dereferencing p->p_limit to ch

NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

2002-10-02 Thread Robert Watson
Running into an odd (and apparently recent) problem involving rmdir(2) and NFS. I have a diskless box started using pxeboot: NFS /, MFS /var, MFS /tmp, recent 5.0-CURRENT. Attempt to rmdir /usr/local (on NFS) results in NFS hanging. It appears to send out the RPC, but no response comes back fr

laptop panicked [with trace]

2002-10-02 Thread Mikhail Teterin
With today's -current. No X11, two ttyv0 in use -- cvs updating, the other -- playing hack(6): Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xbc [... retyped, not copy-pasted, seemingly random numbers marked ``skipped'' ...] kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at

Re: rpcbind failure mode non-ideal if run more than once

2002-10-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:38:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:34:34PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > + (hosts[nhostsbak] = NULL) ? hosts[nhostsbak] : "*", > > Silly last-minute typo== Dammit. Index:

Re: rpcbind failure mode non-ideal if run more than once

2002-10-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:34:34PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > + (hosts[nhostsbak] = NULL) ? hosts[nhostsbak] : "*", Silly last-minute typo== Kris msg43792/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: rpcbind failure mode non-ideal if run more than once

2002-10-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:49:43PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > crash1# rpcbind > Oct 2 12:47:15 crash1 rpcbind: cannot bind (null) on udp6: Address > already in use > Segmentation fault > Oct 2 12:47:15 crash1 kernel: pid 1595 (rpcbind), uid 0: exited on signal > 11 > crash1# > > I'm havin

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Oct, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > /freebsd/current/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1307: could sleep with "filedesc structure" >locked from /freebsd/current/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:959 > > at me and freezes badly at some point (no breaking into ddb possible). > This is totally repeatable. Is anybo

Re: aic7890/91 controller

2002-10-02 Thread marius
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 07:53:27PM -0700, Long, Scott wrote: > > > > The aic 7890/91 is a dual 160 MB controller. > > No, the 7890/91 is 80MB/s max. The Tyan S2462UNG has an aic-7899w. > > > Adaptec's > > documentation expliciely states that the bus speed is the > > rate of th

RE: aic7890/91 controller

2002-10-02 Thread Long, Scott
> > The aic 7890/91 is a dual 160 MB controller. No, the 7890/91 is 80MB/s max. > Adaptec's > documentation expliciely states that the bus speed is the > rate of the _slowest_ device on the channel. No it does not. > Did you try > placing the cd on the B channel or vic

Re: aic7890/91 controller

2002-10-02 Thread Eric Hodel
attila! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Eric: > > The aic 7890/91 is a dual 160 MB controller. Adaptec's > documentation expliciely states that the bus speed is the > rate of the _slowest_ device on the channel. Did you try > placing the cd on the B channel or vice-versa? Tyan,

Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

2002-10-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit cause bug: revision 1.539 date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +10 -0 Save the FP state in the PCB as that is compatable with re

Re: optimization/6627: -fno-align-functions regression from 2.95

2002-10-02 Thread sayle
Synopsis: -fno-align-functions regression from 2.95 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: sayle State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 2 19:45:09 2002 State-Changed-Why: This has just been fixed on mainline CVS by the following patch: 2002-10-02 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTEC

GEOM and -CURRENT

2002-10-02 Thread Will Andrews
Hi Poul et al, I have been unable to test GEOM on my Sparc64 box on the latest -CURRENT due to the rstat.h breakage for the last two days. Please hold off your GEOM-being-standard commit until that's been fixed. BTW, why the heck are people not fixing code that breaks world in <24 hours, let alo

Re: kernel boot messages absent

2002-10-02 Thread Alexander Langer
Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > You can verify with conscontrol. > It should list consolectl for vga console and Muting off. from dmesg: sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> but then: # conscontrol Configured: Available: Muting: off Hmm. Does look odd

Re: ?deleted include file sys/sys/bus_private.h

2002-10-02 Thread Olivier Houchard
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:22:42AM +, attila! wrote: > 5.0-CURRENT slice as of 2002.10.02.12.0.0 > > cvs log: > > Delete src/sys/sys/bus_private.h > > kernel compile log: > > /usr/src/sys/dev/trm/trm.c:71:29: \ > sys/bus_private.h: No such file or direct

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Eric Hodel
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. > > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it > fails to work. A few of my slices got shuffled about, but that was an easy fix, t

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Michael McGoldrick
After a cvsup and buildworld/kernel, everything seems to be working again. Thanks! On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:41:10AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > Hi, > > > On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > >> > > >> On 01-Oct-2

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:28 PM +0200 10/2/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote: >We're at a lucky moment in time, where there's only one version of >expat in the ports tree. But think about what happens when there >are two mainstream versions at large again. > >Please let's learn from past mistakes and give this library a >compl

Re: Fatal warnings breaks ipfw on LP64

2002-10-02 Thread Mike Barcroft
It's been one month, have you made any progress on this? Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c: In function `ipfw_ctl': > /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:2508: warning: cast from pointer to integer of >different size >

Re: hack(6) does not run in xterm!

2002-10-02 Thread Adam Kranzel
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:27:29 -0400 Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just noticed on my > > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 26 11:07:24 EDT 2002 > > % hack > Terminal must backspace. > > Here is the end of the ktrace: > > [...] > 41386 hack RET br

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Lars Eggert
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. > > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it > fails to work. When I enable geom, vinum won't start claiming it can't find its d

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

hack(6) does not run in xterm!

2002-10-02 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Just noticed on my FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 26 11:07:24 EDT 2002 % hack Terminal must backspace. Here is the end of the ktrace: [...] 41386 hack RET break 0 41386 hack CALL break(0x8089000) 41386 hack RET break 0

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-02 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > This is just to note that I have updated the JKH page with a lot of new > stuff, so if your coding-pencil itches: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/TODO/ |Make -j improvement | |make(1) with -j option uses a select lo

panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) today

2002-10-02 Thread David Wolfskill
Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally, built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics: ... Starting nfsd. Updating motd. Starting ntpd. Configuring syscons: blanktime. Starting sshd. Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc02bea10(0xc406a000) 0.006791320 g_dev_

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote: >> > Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata >> > attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID >> > in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi >> > attachment for ata and see if t

uipc_sem.c

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
So, erm, are there any users of the new semaphore code? I kind of doubt it since it has verbose printf's in just about every function. I'm also curious why we don't just use a single semaphore implementation that is shared via wrappers between the SYSV semaphores and the POSIX semaphores. -- J

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> > Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata > > attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID > > in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi > > attachment for ata and see if that works. I still have no idea why >

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-02 ] [ Subjecte: Re: expat2 in the base system? ] > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Recht wrote: > > > IMO 1. would be better with a complete expat. So the ports could use the > > system version and probably/maybe the drift between

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Recht wrote: > IMO 1. would be better with a complete expat. So the ports could use the > system version and probably/maybe the drift between the official- and > system-version will not be that big. And compared to Perl expat it > rather small. So the bloat couldn't be th

Re: Announce: informal quirk maintainer

2002-10-02 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-10-01 13:08, Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will be taking ownership of quirk maintenance to help clarify and > > expedite things. The goal is to interoperate with as much hardware > > as possible while keeping the table attribu

rpcbind failure mode non-ideal if run more than once

2002-10-02 Thread Robert Watson
crash1# rpcbind Oct 2 12:47:15 crash1 rpcbind: cannot bind (null) on udp6: Address already in use Segmentation fault Oct 2 12:47:15 crash1 kernel: pid 1595 (rpcbind), uid 0: exited on signal 11 crash1# I'm having trouble extracting a core so won't be able to follow-up just yet, but it looks li

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> >> So it doesn't boot at all, that's different from "hard-hang during reboot". > >> :) After ppc your device probe is over. You could be getting an > >> interrupt storm. Can you break into ddb when this happens? > > > > Roger the diference. :-) > > > > No. I cannot break into DDB. The keyb

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote: >> > "Hard hang" means that the probe messages stop around the parallel >> > device, and nothing else happens. The PCCARD ethernet remains dead. >> > the disk is silent and no amount of keyboard activity does anything >> > at all. Serial console dead. Reset neede

Is Your Credit Report Stopping You? Find Out!

2002-10-02 Thread CreditFix
We're Not Clowning Around with These Offers: 1) Is Your Credit Report Stopping You? Let Junum's Expertise & Technology Help you! You Only Pay If We Help http://www.qksrv.net/click-1030333-1510752 2) We're Not Clowning Around Get Your Free Auto, Health, Home, or Life Insurance Quote http://www.qk

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: kernel boot messages absent

2002-10-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > Can anyone explain me why with a recent kernel (last kernel was from > > > 1 year ago) the kernel boot messages disappear from the monitor > > > once the "propellor" of the ke

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> > "Hard hang" means that the probe messages stop around the parallel > > device, and nothing else happens. The PCCARD ethernet remains dead. > > the disk is silent and no amount of keyboard activity does anything > > at all. Serial console dead. Reset needed to reboot. > > So it doesn't boot at

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote: >> > Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI >> > causes my system to hard-hang during reboot. I might be able to fix that >> > by futzing with device.hints, but that took me a whole weekend and a >> > reinstall last time I tried.

Re: Tool make ordering, or something

2002-10-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:46:48PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > The best we can do to src/bin/sh is to do something like this: > > #ifndef BOOTSTRAPPING > fmtstr(s, 64, "[%td] ", jp - jobtab + 1); We know when this hit the tree, so please use: #if defined(BOOTSTRAPPING) && (__F

Re: Announce: informal quirk maintainer

2002-10-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-01 13:08, Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will be taking ownership of quirk maintenance to help clarify and > expedite things. The goal is to interoperate with as much hardware > as possible while keeping the table attributed and in > well-maintained order. > > Here are a fe

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> > Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI > > causes my system to hard-hang during reboot. I might be able to fix that > > by futzing with device.hints, but that took me a whole weekend and a > > reinstall last time I tried. Device.hints is a dangerous thing to pl

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote: >> > I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The >> > ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of >> > some kerneldump. I also have no console. >> >> Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
> > Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's > > patch to acpi_pcib_* instead and see if it that helps. Either that or > > turn off ACPI for the time being. > > Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI > causes my system to hard-hang d

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> > I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The > > ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of > > some kerneldump. I also have no console. > > Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's > patch to acpi_pcib_* instead an

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Gallatin w rites: > >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will > > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. > > > > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it > > fails

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. > > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it > fails to work. > What, exactly, would you like tested? options GE

Re: NIS broken by pw_scan.c commits?

2002-10-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > Yes, it is my bug, fixed in rev. 1.23, sorry for inconvenience. No problem -- sorry for getting a bit snippy. I was just a bit surprised and couldn't imagine at first what I had broken in my password file :-). > By the way, there is still an issu

Re: [PATCH] Workaround for bogus INT 12H BIOS serviceimplementation

2002-10-02 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, > > > The patch makes no difference for booting directly from boot2 ... except > > > memsize() in boot2 also fails to check for errors, so it returns garbage > > > values. > > > > Yes I know that :-) > > But booting kernel directly from boot2 is not working at all for > > several years, so my

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote: > Hi > > I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The > ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of > some kerneldump. I also have no console. Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's

Re: Longer term fix for sigreturn ABI breaking

2002-10-02 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > - ret = set_fpcontext(td, &ucp->uc_mcontext); > > - if (ret != 0) > > - return (ret); > > + /* > > +* Intentionally ignore the error to keep binary

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
Hi I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of some kerneldump. I also have no console. Perhaps the legacy stuff needs to be backed out or disabled pending fixing? M Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD

Re: Longer term fix for sigreturn ABI breaking

2002-10-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI > breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t > was changed/enlarged. > > Someone other than I (Bruce?) should vet this. It should > solve the libc_r binary compatibility problem, but i

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/10/02 13:57), Marc Recht wrote: > IMO 1. would be better with a complete expat. So the ports could use > the system version and probably/maybe the drift between the official- > and system-version will not be that big. And compared to Perl expat it > rather small. So the bloat couldn't be

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Recht
> > 2. Under assumed name, "libxmlread" or something. This means that > > nothing which doesn't explicitly ask for it will get in touch with > > this version of libexpat, and that will only be the programs in > > the tree. We don't need to track the official libexpat (sort of > >

Re: [PATCH] Workaround for bogus INT 12H BIOS service implementation

2002-10-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > > Index: sys/i386/i386/machdep.c > > > === > > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v > > > retrieving revision 1.532 > > > diff -u -r1.532 machdep.c > > > --- sys/i386/i3

Profiling kld-modules

2002-10-02 Thread Alexander Haväng
Hi, Is it possible to profile kld-modules using kgmon and gprof or any other combination of profiling tools? I've tried, and failed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Michael McGoldrick
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:23:34PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote: > >> > 'Me too' > >> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > 2. Under assumed name, "libxmlread" or something. This means that > nothing which doesn't explicitly ask for it will get in touch with > this version of libexpat, and that will only be the programs in > the tree. We don't need to

Re: kernel boot messages absent

2002-10-02 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Can anyone explain me why with a recent kernel (last kernel was from > > 1 year ago) the kernel boot messages disappear from the monitor > > once the "propellor" of the kernel boot has done like 5 rounds > > (last message is the last line of the >

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Recht
> Rather than write another monster filled with weird structs and enums > I decided that ASCII is very extensible, and putting XML structure > on top of it meant that readily available libraries and tools could > work on it. Yes, it's IMHO the best way to do it. > And in fact, I have every reaso

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >This could have been done without devfs by mapping names of special files >to numeric indexes in the kernel. Putting the index in the inode is mainly >an efficiency hack. Numeric indexes work quite well in the kernel (better >than pointers in

Re: expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Recht writes: > >Hi! > >I just saw the import of expat 1.95.5 into the base system. And >because expat2 is such a moving target I'm a little bit wondering >why this did happen. Isn't it better to keep such a beast in the >ports-tree? >Or is there a major confi

vnode lock assertion failure in nfs_doio()

2002-10-02 Thread Don Lewis
Version 1.114 of nfs_bio.c added a call to ASSERT_VOP_LOCKED() to nfs_doio(). I've been running a kernel with the DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS option and I can consistently get this assertion to fail by running mozilla with an nfs mounted home directory. The DDB stack trace indicates this assertion fails whe

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: > >I don't really like MAKEDEV. It is creating work and bugs by moving > >problems around that I object to. > > So you don't like DEVFS and you don't like MAKEDEV. > > Say, how _do_ you access your

expat2 in the base system?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Recht
Hi! I just saw the import of expat 1.95.5 into the base system. And because expat2 is such a moving target I'm a little bit wondering why this did happen. Isn't it better to keep such a beast in the ports-tree? Or is there a major config-file to xml rewrite (or something similar) going on nobo

Re: could sleep with messages

2002-10-02 Thread Michael Hostbaek
Rasmus Skaarup (mfbsd) writes: > > > I've been getting the following messages for quite some time, during > boot and when using the pcm device: > > ... > /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1307: could sleep with "pcm0:play:0" locked [...] > ... > > Is anyone interesting in getting more details? > Th

Re: zombies from linux binaries

2002-10-02 Thread Duncan Barclay
On 01-Oct-2002 Lars Eggert wrote: > Duncan Barclay wrote: >> On 01-Oct-2002 Lars Eggert wrote: >>> >>>I've been running the guidescope web ad blocker >>>(http://www.guidescope.com/home/) as a Linux binary under FreeBSD for a >>>long time. The thing seems to fork a child for each web request it

Re: PCI brokenness

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Murray
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > > I'm running a kernel with your very latest nexus.c 1.49. > > > > The problem of the disappearing HD has not been fixed by this. > > > > Enclosed are verbose mesg's, one from a three-hour-ago > > (1st Oct 2002, 11:00 am, BST) kernel (broken), and anoth