On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> Does anyone know a reason why i should not see any info about the thermal
> zones on a Supermicro P6DBU in sysctl? I'm not even seeing the acpi_tz's
> in dmesg. As far as i know, the board does have thermal sensors. I can
> check the cpu tempera
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Hay wrote:
> > > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
> > > >
> > > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The
> > > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
> > > > XNS.
> > >
> > > So you are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:57:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This was my fault. I wasn't paying attention closely to issues with
> > > other compilers. I've had the attached patch in my local tr
Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:43:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >
> > > flat# date | sort +5n
> > > sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > This breaks the buil
> > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
> > >
> > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The
> > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
> > > XNS.
> >
> > So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we
I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL
below. Success/failure reports are appreciated.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:51:14 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seeing the segfault in the kernel make depend step, just as
> someone else reported.
OK, could you please try the patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff and let me know the results.
--
Alex
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:57:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing
> > > that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNU
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:43:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > flat# date | sort +5n
> > sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory
> >
> > This breaks the build in libncurses...
> >
>
> POSIX via wollman.
>
>
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing
> > that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The
> > intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because th
I have two patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/vm86.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/vm86_2.diff
the first patch is to keep vm86lock as a sleep lock, and allow the
thread calling vm86 bios could be preempted, but still only one
thread can call vm86 bios. so if we want a sleep mute
Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing
> that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The
> intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split
> across multiple lines and possibly
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> What about a "ktrace -i": http://www.leidinger.net/ktrace.out.bz2
> (~50k), please tell me when you got it, I want to remove it then.
What you want to do is, figure out exactly which program is crashing.
Add -v to your gcc fl
As far as I can tell there are no __bswap* macros in the libraries; they
are defined as bswap*. Whatever should be happening, the network byte
swapping functions are creeping in using the __hton* and __ntoh* macros.
These are pulling in the __bswap* functions that are of course undefined.
Unless
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing
> that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The
> intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split
> across multiple lines and possibly
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:47:26 -0400 Alexander Kabaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If yes: I can't find a *.core in /usr/{src,obj}, there's no coredump
> > limit, so how do I get the backtrace? I already tried to go into
> > gnu/usr.bin/gperf and make a "make cleandir; make cleandir; make",
> > b
I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing
that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The
intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split
across multiple lines and possibly for other reasons.
It seems to me that making a h
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> > sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> > with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
>
> I
If the ldconfig_insecure flag is set in /etc/rc.conf,
ldconfig doesn't do anything useful at startup time except
complain. The following patch should fix it.
diff -ur /usr/src/etc/rc ./rc
--- /usr/src/etc/rc Tue Sep 17 21:02:01 2002
+++ ./rcSun Sep 22 16:49:19 2002
@@ -692,9 +692,10
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:47:20PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor
> > > code so that it works properly, but
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor
> > code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix
> > the coldsync port. It compiles
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:10:51 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is
> > enabled (as it appears to be by default now)? I get a segfault in the
> > same
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:22:23PM +0900, I wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> > > sure to bring STABLE up to dat
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
John Hay wrote:
> > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
> >
> > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The
> > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
> > XNS.
>
> So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when w
Hi,
> OpenBSD gets these cards right. I've not ported their code to our
> system at this time. I know that the problem is due to our not
> reading the SEEPROM correctly. I talked to the openbsd folks about
> this a long time ago, but didn't have the time needed to follow up.
Thanks for the t
Marc Recht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile
> > on -current, even though it compiles on -stable.
> >
> > I'm getting the compile time error:
> >
> > /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before "fd_set"
> >
> > The
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Hi Mark,
:
: > I have a Netgear FA510 (32-bit CardBus).
: >
: > cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x0
: > cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=80
: > cardbus0: Resource not specified in CI
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
:
: >I think we would have to test all cases with all cards. What cards
: >do you have Stephen, with which clone Chipsets ? Can you make a list
: >of them ?
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Hi,
:
: > ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular
: > change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least)
: > are not yet correctly handled. The code i
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
: and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Not really. No differences that are important. (eg, different machine
names, snap
> John Hay wrote:
> > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
>
> IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The
> SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
> XNS.
So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we
have neti
John Hay wrote:
> Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The
SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
XNS.
FWIW.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> flat# date | sort +5n
> sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory
>
> This breaks the build in libncurses...
>
POSIX via wollman.
See revision 1.58 of /usr/include/unistd.h, i.e.,
/* Define the versions we target
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
>flat# date | sort +5n
>sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory
>
>This breaks the build in libncurses...
Ok, nailed it down.
this commit, is the culprit. I guess it changes the fts ABI in
some subtle way because backing the
Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
>
> I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware
> connectivity.
> I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move
> up to 5.x.
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
>
> >
> > Does an
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor
> code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix
> the coldsync port. It compiles on -stable, but has been broken on
> -current for a
flat# date | sort +5n
sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory
This breaks the build in libncurses...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what c
Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Ken
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> > Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snaps
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site
> snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to
> install -CURRENT on one of my machines.
Because it's the only reliable current snapshot buildi
Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site
snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to
install -CURRENT on one of my machines.
Ken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >
> >I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware
> >connectivity.
> >I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move
> >up to 5.x.
>
> Well, th
hi
does somebody know what this is?
those timeouts show up at boot after the harddisk is detected and when
enter or page-up and page-down in combo with scroll-lock is pressed.
the box works fine
uname -a
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sun Sep 22 19:22:37
CEST 2002 :/u
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware
>connectivity.
>I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move
>up to 5.x.
Well, they'd better get somebody to fix it then because if it doesn't
at le
I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware
connectivity.
I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move
up to 5.x.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
>
> Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently
> uncompilable, seems t
> This is with a gcc 3.1 world, the internal error is in "stage 1:
> bootstrap tools" and gcc 3.2 isn't build at this point. Do you still
> want the backtrace?
Yes.
>
> If yes: I can't find a *.core in /usr/{src,obj}, there's no coredump
> limit, so how do I get the backtrace? I already tried t
Keith Sklower did that work. PORTS?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <20020922163034.GA29873@freya>, Erik Greenwald writes:
>
>Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently
>uncompilable, seems to have been so for a while, and sys/conf/NOTES says
>it's provided for "amusement" value, and are only shipped due to
>interest. I wouldn't mi
Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently
uncompilable, seems to have been so for a while, and sys/conf/NOTES says
it's provided for "amusement" value, and are only shipped due to
interest. I wouldn't mind seeing it go away in -current and if someone
wants it, they can cvs
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 11:27:08 -0400 Alexander Kabaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander, can you get me a backtrace from the failed GCC process?
> What process it is, by the way? GCC, CC1, CPP1?
This is with a gcc 3.1 world, the internal error is in "stage 1:
bootstrap tools" and gcc 3.2 isn'
Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor
code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix
the coldsync port. It compiles on -stable, but has been broken on
-current for a while. Something changed in the fd_set area and it's not
compiled for a l
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:20:14 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander, can you get me a backtrace from the failed GCC process? What
process it is, by the way? GCC, CC1, CPP1?
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
Hi,
I try to update -current form Aug 26 to -current from today:
---snip---
===> gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc
c++ -O -pipe-D__FBSDID=__RCSID -I/big/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../co
ntrib/gperf/lib -I/big/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -c /big/usr/src/contrib/gperf/s
rc/bool-array.cc
c++ -O -pipe
Hi,
> ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular
> change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least)
> are not yet correctly handled. The code in -stable is the old broken but
> apparently harmless code. This new code is attempting to be mo
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:10:51 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is
> enabled (as it appears to be by default now)? I get a segfault in the
> same place every time when compiling a DIAGNOSTIC kernel when I
Does anyone know a reason why i should not see any info about the thermal
zones on a Supermicro P6DBU in sysctl? I'm not even seeing the acpi_tz's
in dmesg. As far as i know, the board does have thermal sensors. I can
check the cpu temperatures in bios. If it would help, i could also provide
t
> I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile
> on -current, even though it compiles on -stable.
>
> I'm getting the compile time error:
>
> /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before "fd_set"
>
> The coldsync header file looks like:
>
> What header am I
On 2002-09-22 14:33, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile
> on -current, even though it compiles on -stable.
>
> I'm getting the compile time error:
>
> /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before "fd_set"
>
On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
>mbr 2002/09/20 08:18:13 PDT
>
> Modified files:
>sys/pci if_dc.c
> Log:
> Fix the support for the AN985/983 chips, which do not set the
> RXSTATE to STOPPED, but to WAIT. This should fix hangs which
> could only b
Hi,
I just got a report from a user which has several dc cards with all
the broken mac adresses.
dc0@pci0:13:0: class=0x02 card=0x05741317 chip=0x09851317 rev=0x11
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Admtek Inc'
device = 'ADM983 fast ethernet controller'
class= network
subclass = et
In a 4.6 environment I'm trying to upgrade to -current but
make installworld as well as kernelbuild fails with signal 12 lots of.
Seems that new system calls and a mix of old kernel and
new binaries is now fighting against another on my system.
How can I get out of this situation? Boot from a f
I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile
on -current, even though it compiles on -stable.
I'm getting the compile time error:
/usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before "fd_set"
The coldsync header file looks like:
#include "config.h"
#include
On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
>I think we would have to test all cases with all cards. What cards
>do you have Stephen, with which clone Chipsets ? Can you make a list
>of them ?
I've only got DE500 (genuine Intel 21143) and Macronix 98715AEC cards.
Nothing PCMCIA or CardBu
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> > sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> > with building CU
With -current sources as of today:
cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses
-I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses
-I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include -Wall -DFREEBSD_NATIVE
-DNDEBUG -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DTERMIOS -c lib_keyname.c -o lib_keyna
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:29PM +0300, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> In case someone is interested about consistent test case, here's
> additional info. Now I built both world and kernel with CPUTYPE=p2
> and kan's patch. I haven't changed anything except uncommenting the
> aforementioned CPUTYPE c
On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
It isn't just you. The same error stopped
I tried to build glade2 (IDE for gtk toolkit) under my 4.6R
system but the port build failed in building the esd (esound) server
or whatever this is.
To make a long story short: I cvsuped and started "make buildworld"
which ran into an error:
===> lib/libbz2
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote:
>
>
>>walt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder
>>>was modified in March of 2001(?)
>>
>>David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort'
>>is completely differe
Works for me:
>>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Sep 22 07:43:35 MSD 2002
$ uname -a
FreeBSD golf.macomnet.net 4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE FreeBSD
4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE #19: Fri Sep 20 17:09:52 MSD 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOLF i386.
--
Maxim Konovalov,
subscribe hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:32:47PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote:
> > eh?
> > it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents
> > me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is
> What error are y
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote:
> walt wrote:
>
> > My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder
> > was modified in March of 2001(?)
>
> David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort'
> is completely different in -STABLE, which I've j
74 matches
Mail list logo
