i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Kernel from latest cvsup refuses to boot. - hangs

2002-09-11 Thread Tim Robbins
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:46:12AM +0530, Sid Carter wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I am still unable to boot into the kernel from the latest cvsup. [...] > System Info > -- [...] > CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (996n77-MHz 686-class CPU)

Re: Any problems with increaseing the dump(8) block size?

2002-09-11 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 11), David O'Brien said: > I'd like to make this commit to get better performance on today's > streaming tape drives. It seems my DLT drive doesn't stream well > with the default block size of '10'. Only if we also raise dd's and tar's default blocksizes to 64k as well :

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Compiling mail/courier with current/new gcc3.2 w/patch

2002-09-11 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | I am using current with a patched gcc3.2. The patched gcc was used to | make world (cvsup - patch gcc - make world) I get the following when | trying to compile ports/mail/courier. | | gmake[1]: Entering directory | `/usr/ports/mail/courier/wor

Re: Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Kenneth Culver wrote: > Oh ok, wierd... I've only tried (unsuccessfully, the compiler errors out) > kde3, and some make worlds and stuff. I guess that's not strenuous enough. kde3 compiled okay for me with Alexander Kabaev's gcc patch posted to this ML. Regards, -- Michael Nottebrock "And t

Compiling mail/courier with current/new gcc3.2 w/patch

2002-09-11 Thread Edwin Culp
I am using current with a patched gcc3.2. The patched gcc was used to make world (cvsup - patch gcc - make world) I get the following when trying to compile ports/mail/courier. gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/mail/courier/work/courier-0.39.3/afx' c++ -I.. -I./.. -Wall -O -pipe -L/u

Re: Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
Oh ok, wierd... I've only tried (unsuccessfully, the compiler errors out) kde3, and some make worlds and stuff. I guess that's not strenuous enough. Ken On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > > > If I were you I'd start swapping memory modules, because I'm not having > > Already did

Re: Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Kip Macy
It may not be memory corruption. I get this panic on various versions of STABLE on different pieces of hardware. See 42235 and 42277. -Kip --- Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > If I were you I'd start swapping memory modules, > because I'm not having > > Al

Re: Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > If I were you I'd start swapping memory modules, because I'm not having Already did that. I even used ECC ram. > any trouble with -CURRENT and I havn't seen anyone else having trouble. Did you try to build a huge project ? If I don't compile anything big and load the machine it works pe

Re: Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
> I just got thisone ... This is CURRENT from 2 hours ago. > > Dammnit. Is this mem corruption ? > If I were you I'd start swapping memory modules, because I'm not having any trouble with -CURRENT and I havn't seen anyone else having trouble. Did you compile your kernel with any wierd optimizatio

Softupdate panic: softdep_update_inodeblock: update failed

2002-09-11 Thread Martin Blapp
I just got thisone ... This is CURRENT from 2 hours ago. Dammnit. Is this mem corruption ? #10 0xc01edb18 in panic (fmt=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:479 #11 0xc02b3539 in softdep_update_inodeblock (ip=0xce432300, bp=0xd878cc84, waitfor=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4

Re: panic: bad pte

2002-09-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, A method to crash current is the following: cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice make extract# does use about 500M diskspace rm -rfd work# removes everything make# create it again I had more panics when

Re: panic: bad pte

2002-09-11 Thread Wesley Morgan
I haven't been paying much attention to the issues lately... BUT... I have the same problem on my p3. But it's not just during the openoffice built.. It occurrs at other times too. Unfortunately it seems to be a hard freeze because I don't get any dumps (or maybe its breaking to ddb and I need to

Re: libiconv broken

2002-09-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:48:04PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > updated this morning (08.00 CET) to latest current (from GCC 3.1.1 to > GCC 3.2) everything runs smoothly. > > But libiconv seems to break: There was a patch posted about a week ago for this. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Sep, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 11-Sep-2002 Don Lewis wrote: >> On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote: >>> I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or pre-alloca

panic: bad pte

2002-09-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, This is current from yesterday. I get all the time the same panics while building openoffice on my PIV machine. Some are due the fg/bg issue. My machine panics instantly if I have a sleeping openoffice build and try it to invoke it again with fg. But this one here happened during comp

reppetead crashs

2002-09-11 Thread Sebastien Gioria
Hi guys, I've got today a lot of repetead crash on my -CURRENT notebook when I do a ftp transfer. I've use ncftp3 and when it hang, I do a CTRL-Z and after this I do a "kill %%". I've under the gnome, using a current as of : eagle bushmills:~>uname -a FreeBSD bushmills.intra.thorm.net 5.0-CURREN

Re: GENERIC kernel panic on boot with latest -current Septembet 11,2002 due to /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c v 1.49

2002-09-11 Thread Nate Lawson
This is being worked on. See msg thread in cvs-all, starting with: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. You can back out the change (1.49) if you need to get running. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

GENERIC kernel panic on boot with latest -current Septembet 11, 2002due to /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c v 1.49

2002-09-11 Thread Vincent Poy
Revelent info: * $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c,v 1.49 2002/09/11 04:10:41 arr Exp $ Console output... Starting syslogd. Sep 11 12:35:51 bigbang syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Starting named. Starting ntpdate. Turning on accounting. recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mut

libiconv broken

2002-09-11 Thread John Angelmo
updated this morning (08.00 CET) to latest current (from GCC 3.1.1 to GCC 3.2) everything runs smoothly. But libiconv seems to break: cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -c ./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo In file included from gbk.h:64, fr

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Sep-2002 Nate Lawson wrote: > JKH task: go through conf/NOTES and move devices that don't (or could > never) build on alpha to i386/conf/NOTES. At the end of this, LINT should > build on alpha and i386. I already did this before when I first created sys/alpha/conf/NOTES. It did build at

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-11 Thread Nate Lawson
JKH task: go through conf/NOTES and move devices that don't (or could never) build on alpha to i386/conf/NOTES. At the end of this, LINT should build on alpha and i386. BTW, I would think there should be a pc98/conf/NOTES that most stuff moved out of the global notes should go into as well as i

Re: Kernel from latest cvsup refuses to boot. - hangs

2002-09-11 Thread Nate Lawson
It's probably a device driver probe problem although it's impossible to tell without more info. Enable options DDB, boot -vs, wait for the hang. Hit CTRL-ALT-ESC to go into DDB and type tr to get a backtrace. Copy the trace info (serial console is best for this). Hit c for continue, wait, repe

Call for testers for mlx(4) patch

2002-09-11 Thread John Baldwin
Can people please test the following patch also available at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/mlx.patch It fixes problems when using older Mylex controllers in Alphas, but I'd like to make sure it doesn't break mlx(4) for other folks before committing. Mike Smith has given the patch a once ov

Re: Any problems with increaseing the dump(8) block size?

2002-09-11 Thread Matthew Jacob
No. Don't change this- people are very well attuned to using an argument to change it and all your change will do is catch the unwary and possibly break binary compat on apps that define records based off of NTREC. On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > I'd like to make this commit to get

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Sep-2002 Don Lewis wrote: > On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen >>> before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or >>> pre-allocating should always be a last resort. >>

Any problems with increaseing the dump(8) block size?

2002-09-11 Thread David O'Brien
I'd like to make this commit to get better performance on today's streaming tape drives. It seems my DLT drive doesn't stream well with the default block size of '10'. Index: include/protocols/dumprestore.h === RCS file: /home/ncvs

Kernel from latest cvsup refuses to boot. - hangs

2002-09-11 Thread Sid Carter
Hi Folks, I am still unable to boot into the kernel from the latest cvsup. I did a "make buildworld and make kernel" and when I try to "boot -vs", it goes on to register procfs and then hangs at this stagethis is what it finally prints...and freezes Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec bpf

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: nfs_inactive() bug? -> panic: lockmgr: locking against myself

2002-09-11 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Lewis writes: > >A potentially better solution just occurred to me. It looks like it >would be better if vrele() waited to decrement v_usecount until *after* >the call to VOP_INACTIVE() (and after the call to VI_LOCK()). If that >were done, nfs_inactive() woul