On 21 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Martin Blapp wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Try to compile the entire system on another box, install it then
>> on the CURRENT target box, and try again !
>>
>> Bye the way, after 6 rounds, I see now SIG4 and SIG11 too :-/
>> To bad - so it's definitly data corr
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:34:36PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> On a hunch, I will guess that the special case code for ISA
> sharing for the keyboard and mouse on the same PS/2 controller
> is not present in the ACPI.
>
> Try not loading ACPI, and see if it fixes it for you (this
> seems to be
On 21 Aug, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Try to compile the entire system on another box, install it then
> on the CURRENT target box, and try again !
>
> Bye the way, after 6 rounds, I see now SIG4 and SIG11 too :-/
> To bad - so it's definitly data corruption in CURRENT.
>
> Asus Board P4B
Anselm Garbe wrote:
> atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
> atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
> kbd0 at atkbd0
> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0
> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3
Mine (which works) says:
atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
Hi
Please try to continue from where it broke by repeating make. Otherwise,
please get a precompiled port package.
kt
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:26:37PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:05:17PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:38:20PM +0800,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:05:44PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> BTW, just a hunch: try reverting sys/dev/pci/pci.c to 1.194 and see if
> that helps. Looks like the current version of psm.c is requesting a
> shared interrupt (RF_SHAREABLE).
I've done that and compiled a new kernel (currently with
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote:
> At least one person with a 6100 persevered further with this, maybe
> someone else can help you with the current status or better advice?
There is an issue with the HP laptop DSDT and our ACPI code. They
initialize some child devices before initializing
Am Mi, 2002-08-21 um 21.52 schrieb Andy Sparrow:
>
> > i'm trying to install current from cd (i took 3 different builds) to
> > my notebook hp omnibook 6100. by booting the kernel after few lines
> > is the machine crashing. i'm not abte to see the reason, everything
> > goes too fast. has anybod
Hi Nate,
here's my dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Aug 19 22:50:47 CEST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Stocker) wrote:
> I cant mount my floppy from time to time.
>
> twoflower# mount -t msdosfs /dev/fd0 /home/jstocker/floppy/
> msdosfs: /dev/fd0: Device not configured
ENXIO is something of a `catch-all' error code in the kernel. It
could mean that there's no such dri
> i'm trying to install current from cd (i took 3 different builds) to
> my notebook hp omnibook 6100. by booting the kernel after few lines
> is the machine crashing. i'm not abte to see the reason, everything
> goes too fast. has anybody similar situation? any ideas why? 4.6
> works fine.
Hi T
Hi,
Try to compile the entire system on another box, install it then
on the CURRENT target box, and try again !
Bye the way, after 6 rounds, I see now SIG4 and SIG11 too :-/
To bad - so it's definitly data corruption in CURRENT.
Asus Board P4B533-V, P-IV 2,26Ghz, 1GB DDR 2100 Ram.
Martin
Mar
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:05:17PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:38:20PM +0800, KT Sin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I believe this is caused by the pre-released version of gcc in the system.
> >
> > I started seeing this problem one week after I upgraded my hardware to
> >
Tomas Hodan wrote:
> i'm trying to install current from cd (i took 3 different builds) to
> my notebook hp omnibook 6100. by booting the kernel after few lines
> is the machine crashing. i'm not abte to see the reason, everything
> goes too fast. has anybody similar situation? any ideas why? 4.6
>
As Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> my kernel can't detect fdc anymore when loading acpi. does anybody else
> have such issues?
Hmm, not here. However, my fdc driver is modloaded, too (from the
bootloader). I just tried to unload it, then load acpi (which yields
module_register_init: MOD_LO
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:38:20PM +0800, KT Sin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I believe this is caused by the pre-released version of gcc in the system.
>
> I started seeing this problem one week after I upgraded my hardware to
> Pentium 4 in May. Two weeks ago, I built the final release version of
> gcc 3.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:48:38 +0200 (CEST) Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As reported, Brian and I did see SIG4 and SIG11 during make
> buildworlds.
>
> I've replaced everything, two - three times, the problem persisted.
> I also tried three motherboards, but all from the same type:
>
> There are a few files with PFIL_HOOKS-dependant #ifdefs, but it is
> strongly
> tied with the code.
>
> /sys/net/bridge.c
> /sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> /sys/netinet/ip_output.c
> /sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c
> /sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c
> /sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c
>
> Darren Reed has some pieces
Hello, David!
You wrote to "Sergey Mokryshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Aug 2002
12:07:43 -0500:
>> No, ipl.ko is not broken. It depends on pfil(9).
DWC> Shouldn't we try to make a pfil.ko that ipl.ko depends on then?
I make a brief look into code (I am not a kernel hacker nor a
programm
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I think everyone in this thread needs to read the last instance of
> this same thread, the first time it came up.
>
> I believe the general consensus was to send the 6, and if it failed,
> retry with the 10, and set a flag so that subsequent requests we
> No, ipl.ko is not broken. It depends on pfil(9).
>
Shouldn't we try to make a pfil.ko that ipl.ko depends on then?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
(removed questions@ from Cc)
Hello, David!
You wrote to "Sergey Mokryshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Aug 2002
11:26:32 -0500:
>> Another point - you can upgrade ipfilter stuff without rebooting,
>> it is useful in situations where minimum downtime is possible.
>> PFIL_HOOKS does not add
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 11:51 pm, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> Looks like nobody else expirienced this problem
>
>Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> > portupgrade fails with re
> Another point - you can upgrade ipfilter stuff without rebooting,
> it is useful in situations where minimum downtime is possible.
>
> PFIL_HOOKS does not add much functionality to the kernel and
> I always turn this on on every box.
I think you are missing his point though. Some people kldlo
Hello, Crist!
You wrote to "Sergey Mokryshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 20 Aug 2002
11:15:20 -0700:
[skipped]
>> $ grep PFIL /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/AMBER options
>> PFIL_HOOKS
>> You need to include "options PFIL_HOOKS" in your kernel
>> configuration to be able to use ipfilter as a loadab
Hi
I believe this is caused by the pre-released version of gcc in the system.
I started seeing this problem one week after I upgraded my hardware to
Pentium 4 in May. Two weeks ago, I built the final release version of
gcc 3.1.1 in the ports and used that to compile the kernel and userlands.
A
Hi,
> > The 2nd one fails at exactly the same point, that can't be coindedence.
> > Also with a signal 10. (libutil)
> >
> > The 3rd ended somewhere else(games/rogue), but now with signal 4.
> >
> > Doing the 4rd now.
>
> Which ends with signal 11 in usr.sbin/devinfo/ ...
>
> Mark
May this be t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:45:54PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > > Can you try that ?
> >
> > Eek! First one already bailed out! Talking about bad luck!
> > Signal 10 this time.
>
> The 2nd one fails at exactly the same point, that can't be coindedence.
> Also with a signal 10. (libutil)
>
>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:32:44PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > > I have a P4 mobile in my laptop and also had this behaviour for a certain
> > > -current window last week (the time I got the laptop). (Dell C640)
> > > Now it is
Maxim M. Kazachek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
> target "patch-message" ignored
One of the recent changes in make (revision 1.38 of parse.c) causes
it to emit this type of warning. This causes heaps of apparently
harmless war
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
i'm trying to install current from cd (i took 3 different builds) to
my notebook hp omnibook 6100. by booting the kernel after few lines
is the machine crashing. i'm not abte to see the reason, everything
goes too fast. has anybody similar
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:32:44PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > I have a P4 mobile in my laptop and also had this behaviour for a certain
> > -current window last week (the time I got the laptop). (Dell C640)
> > Now it is gone. I'm sorry, I don't have an exact date/commit.
>
> Try to do some
Hi,
> I have a P4 mobile in my laptop and also had this behaviour for a certain
> -current window last week (the time I got the laptop). (Dell C640)
> Now it is gone. I'm sorry, I don't have an exact date/commit.
Try to do some worlds in a row (5-10) and you will see if it survives.
The probl
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As reported, Brian and I did see SIG4 and SIG11 during make buildworlds.
>
> I've replaced everything, two - three times, the problem persisted.
> I also tried three motherboards, but all from the same type:
>
> Intel BD
Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> Looks like nobody else expirienced this problem
>
>Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
>
>
>> portupgrade fails with reason (Makefile broken) on
Hi,
As reported, Brian and I did see SIG4 and SIG11 during make buildworlds.
I've replaced everything, two - three times, the problem persisted.
I also tried three motherboards, but all from the same type:
Intel BD843BG with DDR 266 Ram (2100).
Just for interest, I've replaced this Mobo now w
> my kernel can't detect fdc anymore when loading acpi. does anybody else
> have such issues?
>
> i know that it worked with a Aug 6 or a Aug 3 kernel, this was the last
> time i accessed my fd0.
>
> though reverting to a -D 08/06/2002 src/sys doesn't bring the desired
> effect (working fdc).
H
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ds10#make
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 140: warning: "make -f /dev/null -m
> /usr/src/share/mk CPUTYPE=ev56 -V CPUTYPE" returned non-zero status
There was a time window when "make -V ..." was broken on 64-bit
archs,
> What kind of value do you use for N? It looks like lately the makefiles
> are too aggressive when using -j, so you end up with N * N * 2 processes
> running simultaneously. On my -current box with 128M RAM, I used -j13
> for a long time, but that runs out of swap nowadays, so I'm using -j4
> whi
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:51:59 +0700 (NOVST) Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> Looks like nobody else expirienced this problem
> >"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
> >target "patch-message" ignored
no, i got the same problem. some make issue i guess
--
/"\ http://c
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Looks like nobody else expirienced this problem
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> portupgrade fails with reason (Makefile broken) on print/jadetex
>and x11-fonts/webfonts due to
43 matches
Mail list logo
