Prasad,
I'm glad to see that you have taken an interest in FreeBSD.
Unfortunately the -CURRENT branch is a development branch. This means it
it known to have many many bugs and is garaunteed not to be stable for
everyday use.
As an example, I installed the -CURRENT software two days ago and have
With nothing registering the interrupt I am mostly idle. Loading
snd_emu10k1 sound driver evokes the following in dmesg (if I can paste
it correctly this time):
pcm0: port 0x2080-0x209f irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci2
pcib2: device pcm0 requested decoded I/O range 0x2080-0x209f
emu:
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
> > ---
> > Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
> > sleep with "process lock" locked from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:321
> > Jun 25 18:21:19 calvin syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/k
Shizuka Kudo wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. I'm just curious why a lower
> optimization level could cause trouble than -O.
> Anyway, my -current works fine with the default
> CFLAGS. It seems that there're some commits to
> rtld-elf on today.
THe compiler is broken.
If you are that intent on c
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> On my -current laptop, and my other -current and -stable machines, TCP
> seems to work a lot better if I disable net.inet.tcp.newreno.
>
> Has anybody else seen similar behaviour ?
>
> Who owns this problem ?
I believe Matt Dillon touched the workaround last...
-- Te
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> mark> /usr/sbin/sysinstall * - fix - *
>
> What should we do about sysinstall and perl5 package? Options for the
> solution may include:
[ ... ]
> 5) (add your option here)
Make perl "just another package".
Bonus points: In the "upgrade" case, install it if pe
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Michael Nottebrock:
> > You need a clean /usr/include. Remove the old one and 'make includes' in
>
> Good, that I had.
>
> > /usr/src. Please make also sure your ports-tree is up to date. I think
> > you're using an old bsd.kde.mk.
>
> That was it, thanks.
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
> to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
> with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
> /usr/include/g++ and the old one (which has lots
Munish Chopra wrote:
> On 2002-06-25 12:44 +, Sid Carter wrote:
> > Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
> > latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
> > gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
>
> Not exa
Hello Sheldon,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Could someone put me out of my misery and show me "the right way" to
> build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
>
> I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
> where that
hello, world\n
for a few days now I'm trying to upgrade my -current from about Wed May
1 but keep running into the following. I've nuked /usr/src and /usr/obj
to remove the possibility of stale files. Could the reason be that my old
current still uses gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD] or some
Is this not the latest one?
alpha:~:> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.1 [FreeBSD] 20020509 (prerelease)
Ken
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sid Carter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to t
Sid Carter wrote:
> Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
> latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
> gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
On Intel, FreeBSD will automatically use 4M pages for mmap'ed
devic
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:14:30PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> # diff -u2 /usr/src/Makefile.inc1.orig /usr/src/Makefile.inc1
> --- /usr/src/Makefile.inc1.origMon Apr 29 20:42:50 2002
> +++ /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 Tue Jun 25 20:05:28 2002
> @@ -402,9 +402,10 @@
> KRNLCONFDIR= ${K
Visite nuestra página Web en http://www.shell.com.ar
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener información amparada por el secreto comercial. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error, por favor tenga la amabilidad de comunic
Chris Hansen- Original Message -From: "friends" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tue,25 Jun 2002 20:42:39 PMSubject: !!This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you need to unsubscribe, follow the instructions at the bottom of the message.*
On 24-Jun-2002 (11:36:34/GMT) Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>> The only (I think) user configurable file under /usr/src tree is
>> the custom kernel file, pointed by KERNCONF in /etc/make.conf.
> "cd /usr/src; make {build,install}kernel" with
> KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_CFG
> KERNCONFDIR=/path/to/dir/of/Y
I made the following patch to get C++ exceptions working with
system GCC 3.1. STLPort and all other previously failing
test cases appear to be working fine.
Please test this patch and let me know if it breaks anything.
--
Alexander Kabaev
Index: config/i386/freebsd.h
Sid Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is so cool ;)
>
> I just got rebooted again, :D
>
> The "messages" show this.
>
> ---
> Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
> sleep with "process lock" locked from
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:33:27PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Was that advice based on the fact that you've built XFree86-4
> successfully with lang/gcc31, or was it an educated guess?
Just a guess. I wonder if C++ code is being compiled with `gcc' rather
than `g++'.
To Unsubscribe: send mai
On (2002/06/25 10:06), David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > Could someone put me out of my misery and show me "the right way" to
> > build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
> >
> > I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++3
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Could someone put me out of my misery and show me "the right way" to
> build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
>
> I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
> where that g++31 comes from the lang/gcc3
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:12:25PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> 2) Use additional menu for "install perl5 package or not", if 'base'
>distribution is selected. Install perl5 package if user selects
>"yes" to the menu.
>
> pros: Choices is available. Maybe nobody forget to ins
I'm getting the following on upgrade:
rm -f translate.o
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../../exports/lib cc -c -O -pipe-ansi -pedantic
-Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-I../../../../exports/include -I../../../../exports/include/X11
-I../../../../include/extensions -I../../../../extras/M
Well I get a build error here, my current is one day old and the
perlport is installed.
/John
xfree86-4
Description: application/java-applet
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> The last commit to sys/sys/stat.h made by Kirk broke compilation of
> _POSIX_SOURCE programs. It uses sizeof(struct timespec) to pad the
> st_createtimespec field to 16 bytes, but struct timespec is not visible
> when _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Oops.
--- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I ran into, what I think is the same thing as you're
> describing, a
> while ago. The short and skinny being that -O0
> doesn't compile any
> ASM which breaks things and is why you need at least
> -O to compile the
> kernel/world. ::shrug:: I
On my -current laptop, and my other -current and -stable machines, TCP
seems to work a lot better if I disable net.inet.tcp.newreno.
Has anybody else seen similar behaviour ?
Who owns this problem ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP sin
The last commit to sys/sys/stat.h made by Kirk broke compilation of
_POSIX_SOURCE programs. It uses sizeof(struct timespec) to pad the
st_createtimespec field to 16 bytes, but struct timespec is not visible
when _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
Hi,
with a -current CVSupped 17 May 22:27 GMT-2:
hunter[4]$ gdb -k kernel.debug vmcore.23
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under ce
I just copied the relevant example from IBM developerWorks site. I guess
they have a thing or two to learn on the topic they were trying to teach
:)
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your patch isn't quite right. It's true that matching constr
Hi,
This is so cool ;)
I just got rebooted again, :D
The "messages" show this.
---
Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
sleep with "process lock" locked from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:321
Jun 25 18:21:19 calvin sy
An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:13:44AM -0700, Edwin Culp schreib :
> Quoting Sid Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | FreeBSD calvin 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 10 13:55:43 IST
> | 2002 root@calvin:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Hi guys,
Another reboot. This seems to happen when I
According to Makoto Matsushita:
> 3) New entry 'perl5' is added to the distributions list, just like
>base, compat4x, crypto, XFree86, etc. Install perl5 package if
>perl5 package is selected.
3a) new entry perl5 added but selected by default to match what's in
STABLE.
POLA is respected
mark> /usr/sbin/sysinstall * - fix - *
What should we do about sysinstall and perl5 package? Options for the
solution may include:
1) Install perl5 package also if 'base' distribution is selected.
pros: Nobody forget to install perl5 package. /usr/bin/perl
should w
> Kinda buggy. :)
Ya, ya, ya. :-)
That was the concept model. The actual author can make it robust. :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ãкº¡Ò÷ӧҹ¢Í§¸ØáԨã¹Í¹Ò¤µ·Óä´é§èÒÂ
áÅÐÊÃéÒ§ÃÒÂä´é§ÒÁ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹ¼èÒ¹Ãкº¼ÁÁÕÃÒÂä´éÁÒ¡¡ÇèÒ
30,000 / à´×͹ ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹà¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3
ªÑèÇâÁ§à·èÒ¹Ñé¹âÍ¡ÒÊÁÒ¶Ö§¤Ø³áÅéÇ
!à
* Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020625 02:26] wrote:
>
> > I couldn't see a simple way around this, any clues?
>
> How's this?
>
> int handle;
> template = "/tmp/mumble";
> char *cmd;
> handle = mkstemp(template); // template is modified
> asprintf(cmd, "prog > %s", template);
> syst
Ãкº¡Ò÷ӧҹ¢Í§¸ØáԨã¹Í¹Ò¤µ·Óä´é§èÒÂ
áÅÐÊÃéÒ§ÃÒÂä´é§ÒÁ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹ¼èÒ¹Ãкº¼ÁÁÕÃÒÂä´éÁÒ¡¡ÇèÒ
30,000 / à´×͹ ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹà¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3
ªÑèÇâÁ§à·èÒ¹Ñé¹âÍ¡ÒÊÁÒ¶Ö§¤Ø³áÅéÇ
!à
On (2002/06/25 10:20), Mark Murray wrote:
> How's this?
>
> int handle;
> template = "/tmp/mumble";
> char *cmd;
> handle = mkstemp(template); // template is modified
> asprintf(cmd, "prog > %s", template);
> system(cmd);
> close(handle); // bye-bye file
It would be failsafe if you test
> > o Please shorten any long line or comment to less than 80 columns
>
> This is quite tricky when using 8 character tabs. Is 4 character indent
> okay for userland source?
"Real" tabs are best. Look at style(9) for ways to break the long
lines.
It is ok to break very long
According to Michael Nottebrock:
> You need a clean /usr/include. Remove the old one and 'make includes' in
Good, that I had.
> /usr/src. Please make also sure your ports-tree is up to date. I think
> you're using an old bsd.kde.mk.
That was it, thanks.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Po
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
> to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
> with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
> /usr/include/g++ and the old one (whi
Hello,
I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
/usr/include/g++ and the old one (which has lots of older files due to
C
/usr/sbin/sysinstall* - fix - *
sys/*/conf/gethints.pl * - del?/fix? - *
/usr/bin/afmtodit Kyle Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - redo - *
/usr/bin/mmroff Lester A Mesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - redo - *
/usr/bin/whereissheldonh - redo - *
/usr/sbin/adduser Mike Makonnen <
Title: RE: GCC upgrade ? on -current
> Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
> latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile
> with gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just
> for that.
Only David's(?) time constraints I think.
On 2002-06-25 12:44 +, Sid Carter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
> latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
> gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> S
> Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
> latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile
> with gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just
> for that.
I hacked together a really crude patch based on some info from Joe
Clark(e?). Dig
Hi folks,
Could someone put me out of my misery and show me "the right way" to
build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
where that g++31 comes from the lang/gcc31 port, and either way,
XFree86-4-clients fails with:
/usr/X1
49 matches
Mail list logo
