problems I ran into, some similar to the ones above.
This is enough to get started with. If anyone wants to see the full
console log, it is available at:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy/session.log.20020609
There was one other problem I ran into that wasn't related to sleeping
whil
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 08:57:13PM -0700, J. Mallett wrote:
> * From Andrew Lankford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > In the file /usr/src/share/sendmail/Makefile:
> >
> > copies::
> > .for dir in ${CFDIRS}
> > ${INSTALL} -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 755 -d ${DDIR}/${dir}
> > .endfor
> >
> > ...acc
* From Andrew Lankford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> In the file /usr/src/share/sendmail/Makefile:
>
> copies::
> .for dir in ${CFDIRS}
> ${INSTALL} -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 755 -d ${DDIR}/${dir}
> .endfor
>
> ...according to the fine man page, the -d option should appear before both the
> targe
In the file /usr/src/share/sendmail/Makefile:
copies::
.for dir in ${CFDIRS}
${INSTALL} -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 755 -d ${DDIR}/${dir}
.endfor
...according to the fine man page, the -d option should appear before both the
target directory and all the other options.
Also, it appears that I
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
> >
> > > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind
> > > if I take a stab at it?
> >
> >No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who d
Terry Lambert wrote:
> If we are expressing preferences, I prefer that it be called:
>
> NO_WE_CHANGE_THE_NAME_SO_YOU_GET_PERL_ANYWAY_`date "+%Y%m%d%H%M%S"`
If we're expressing preferences, I think we should eliminate the wrapper
altogether.
> Just so that the name matches it's *real* functi
At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
>
> > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind
> > if I take a stab at it?
>
>No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-(
RPI has been running with
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:25:53PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:15:49PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > Somebody who has an alpha at hand needs to make the alpha boot1 code
> > use sys/boot/common/ufsread.c before June 19th where the UFS2 patch
> > is scheduled
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
>
> The logic for testing UMA_ZFLAG_INTERNAL in zone_dtor() is reversed.
> I was able to reliably reproduce crashes with:
>
> mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 10m
> mdconfig -d -u 0
> mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 10m
> mdconfig -d -u 0
>
> Ian
>
>
Running on a dual celeron box.
CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (367.50-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5
Features=0x183fbff
real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes)
avail memory = 191365120 (186880K bytes)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> The problem is that as soon as i open isochronous pipe and
> start incoming isochronous transfer, the isochronous callback
> gets called over and over again. Both isoc. pipe and isoc.
> transfer have USBD_NO_SHORT_XFER flag set. I also set
> configuration #5 for interface
Hackers,
I'm a USB newbie and have a couple stupid questions about USB
transfers.
System: -current DP1
Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked/undocked)
Device: 3COM Bluetooth USB dongle (see attached dump)
Device presents three interfaces:
Interface 0 - Control, bulk and interrupt transfers
Interf
lock order reversal
1st 0xc9c48d98 sis0 (network driver) @ /usr.current/src/sys/pci/if_sis.c:804
2nd 0xc0328600 allproc (allproc) @ /usr.current/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:309
Is this a problem ?
-Arun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 03:50:03PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> I'm unable to hide:
> > X-Authentication-Warning: ...goofy set sender to foobar using -f
>
> neither using this m4 macros:
> define(`confTRUSTED_USERS', ``goofy'')
> FEATURE(`use_ct_file')
>
> nor editing sendmail.cf adding
Thank you!
By eliminating "-O" option, I could make XFree86-4-Server which works.
"-O -pipe" was in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Riccardo Torrini write
s:
>This enable my user to use scanner. I tryed the same with digital
>camera but (I think) DEVFS reset protections to read only.
DEVFS certainly doesn't. The device driver might.
Dima Dorfman has code in the pipeline which will allow you
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> I'm unable to hide:
> > X-Authentication-Warning: ...goofy set sender to foobar using -f
>
> neither using this m4 macros:
> define(`confTRUSTED_USERS', ``goofy'')
> FEATURE(`use_ct_file')
Did you add this to submit.mc?
Please see cf/README:
I'm unable to hide:
> X-Authentication-Warning: ...goofy set sender to foobar using -f
neither using this m4 macros:
define(`confTRUSTED_USERS', ``goofy'')
FEATURE(`use_ct_file')
nor editing sendmail.cf adding T class.
Tgoofy
I'm using sendmail 8.12.3 on 4.6-PRERELEASE and 5.0-CURRENT bu
I have a USB scanner (Epson Perfection 1240U) and a digital camera
(Agfa CL18). The first is identified as uscanner0 and work really
well, the second show up as ugen{0,0.1,0.2,0.3}
With -CURRENT and DEVFS both come up with read/write enable only
for root, so I added this line for scanner to etc/
This block crashes usbd with:
...(usbd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
I have a pre-GCC_3.1:
(FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Wed May 8 02:31:46 CEST 2002)
-8<-[ /etc/usbd.conf ]-8<-
device "Scanner Epson Perfection 1240U (photo)"
# Perfection1240(0x010b), EPSON(0x
Doug Barton wrote:
> Anton Berezin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 02:39:45AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > Per discussion with various folks, including Mark, I've moved the
> > > NO_PERL knob over to NO_PERL_WRAPPER, and documented same. Given that
> > > this is a fundamentally different thi
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 04:07:43AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Attached is a patch that I think sufficiently updates use.perl to handle
> > the state of the world in -current, without boning things for -stable.
> > It also moves some duplicate code up
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 04:07:43AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Attached is a patch that I think sufficiently updates use.perl to handle
> the state of the world in -current, without boning things for -stable.
> It also moves some duplicate code up out of the functions.
> Comments/suggestions welc
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 04:12:37AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Anton Berezin wrote:
> > The compatibility is a moot point either way, since there was no NO_PERL
> > knob - it used to be called NOPERL.
>
> It's NOPERL in -stable, but it was NO_PERL in -current when I changed it
> to NO_PERL_WRAPP
Anton Berezin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 02:39:45AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Per discussion with various folks, including Mark, I've moved the
> > NO_PERL knob over to NO_PERL_WRAPPER, and documented same. Given that
> > this is a fundamentally different thing than the old perl knobs
Attached is a patch that I think sufficiently updates use.perl to handle
the state of the world in -current, without boning things for -stable.
It also moves some duplicate code up out of the functions.
There are certainly other possible ways to solve this problem, but I've
tested the attached pa
Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> I know that the specific mergemaster issues have been addressed, but I
> thought this experience pointed out something subtly astonishing, so I
> figured I'd point it out.
>
> I ran mergemaster, and the perl wrapper started complaining that I
> needed to install perl, so I
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 02:39:45AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Per discussion with various folks, including Mark, I've moved the
> NO_PERL knob over to NO_PERL_WRAPPER, and documented same. Given that
> this is a fundamentally different thing than the old perl knobs, my
> opinion is that we don't
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
> Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind if I take a
> stab at it?
No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-(
Cheers,
\Anton.
--
| Anton Berezin| FreeBSD: The power to ser
Per discussion with various folks, including Mark, I've moved the
NO_PERL knob over to NO_PERL_WRAPPER, and documented same. Given that
this is a fundamentally different thing than the old perl knobs, my
opinion is that we don't need to provide compatibility, but I won't
argue that point too stron
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:11:13PM +0900, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
> Thank you! Your patch-z32 made me happy a little.
>
> When can I compile XFree86-4-Server-4.2.0_2 with -current?
> It gives me "internal compiler error", too as below. I had
> thought it uses XFree86-4-libraries port wh
32 matches
Mail list logo
