Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 23:32 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > perl: Perl is not installed, try 'pkg_add -r perl' > > Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug > in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not > in $P

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Junk in new gcc include path

2002-05-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > So why does adding "-I/usr/include" to CPPFLAGS cause the compiler to ignore > the headers in /usr/include? It doesn't -- it just causes the compiler to emit a warning message which confuses AC_CHECK_HEADER in some versions of autoconf. (I think 2.52 doesn't have this problem, but 2.1

Mutex statistics script

2002-05-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
[Please direct followups to -chat.] < said: > Here's a list of the ten most frequently acquired mutices (over a ObLanguagePeeve: ``Mutex'' is a portmanteau of ``MUTual EXclusion''; a Latinate plural is thus entirely inappropriate. The plural of ``mutex'' is ``mutexes''. -GAWollman To Unsub

Mutex statistics script

2002-05-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
The attached script sorts the data from the debug.mutex.prof.stats sysctl variable according to the selected key (the default being the mutex name) The -g option causes the script to strip off the source file and line and accumulate totals for each mutex. The -r option reverses the sorting order

Re: Junk in new gcc include path

2002-05-25 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does anybody else saw this too? > I just run 'cc -v hello.c' (printing Hello, world) and see: > ... > GNU C version 3.1 [FreeBSD] 20020509 (prerelease) > (i386-undermydesk-freebsd) > compiled by GNU C version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]. > igno

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug > > > in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not > > > in $PA

duplicate free from "cache_drain" on -current

2002-05-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This is with a version of the md-driver which I will commit in a few moments and Kirks UFS2 patch. The system is in single user and now swap has been configured so it run out of VM. Poul-Henning syv# mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 128g md3: Malloc disk md3 syv# newfs -O 2 /dev/md3 IOCTL(0x41146465)

Junk in new gcc include path

2002-05-25 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Does anybody else saw this too? I just run 'cc -v hello.c' (printing Hello, world) and see: ... GNU C version 3.1 [FreeBSD] 20020509 (prerelease) (i386-undermydesk-freebsd) compiled by GNU C version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]. ignoring nonexistent directory "NONE/include" ignoring duplicat

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug > > in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not > > in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). > > How about this: > > I

Re: mfs in current

2002-05-25 Thread Martin Faxer
On 2002.05.25 20:16:05 +, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > i was wondering, where the mount_mfs in the current version has gone? i > am using current on my dell laptop (compatibility reason with 32bit > cardbus) and would like to increase the performance with a mfs mount for > my swap partition. MFS

mfs in current

2002-05-25 Thread Emanuel Haupt
i was wondering, where the mount_mfs in the current version has gone? i am using current on my dell laptop (compatibility reason with 32bit cardbus) and would like to increase the performance with a mfs mount for my swap partition. thanx for your answers. emanuel To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: Status of cross releases

2002-05-25 Thread Paul Saab
Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I would also appreciate if someone could provide me with accounts > on sparc64 and ia64 boxes running 5.0-CURRENT, so I could polish > and actually test some changes. We are not allowed to provide general access to the current ia64 hardware we have beca

Status of cross releases

2002-05-25 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! With small hacks for ia64 and sparc64, I have now been able to produce the snapshots for alpha, i386, ia64, pc98, and sparc64 5.0-CURRENT on my 4.5-STABLE i386 box: ftp://ftp.sunbay.net//pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ Both ia64 and sparc64 need their release/ subdirs to be filled in, and produced s

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-25 Thread Bob Bishop
CPU: Cyrix 486DX2 (486-class CPU) Origin = "CyrixInstead" DIR=0xa01b Stepping=10 Revision=0 # ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffd04 -> 0xbfbffcc8 -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 [EMAIL PROTECTED]fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To U

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug > in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not > in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). How about this: Index: perl.c ==

Re: Problems with DP1

2002-05-25 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:44:45AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Hi again, > Well, maybe. :) If the bug is reproducible, it would be nice to see if the > submitter can reproduce it on current -current. I upgraded this box yesterday: flynn@kajsa# uname -a FreeBSD kajsa.energyhq.tk 5.0-CURRENT Fre

Информационное письмо

2002-05-25 Thread List Manager
  óéâéîæïãåîôò       òÁÓÐÉÓÁÎÉÅ ËÕÒÓÏ×