Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:38:49PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > I really do not like this change, please return things such that the > > > long-ingraned "cd /usr/src ; make includes". > > > > I planned to fix this by changing "make includes" to print

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:18:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:10:51PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Why change in the first place? > > > > > > What was wrong with 'make includes'? Why break POLA? > > > > > They were broken. See commit log for share/mk/bsd.incs

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:43:01AM +, Hiten Pandya wrote: > --- Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > People might want to use it like that: > > > > make world > > mv /usr/include /usr/include.old > > Sorry to butt in; but wouldn't it be more good if this step was done > by the build

Re: Is current 'safe' to play in again [post GCC changes/stability]

> Fwiw, with tonight's -current I am seeing > > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -ffreestanding -DCOMPORT=0x3f8 -DCOMSPEED=9600 > -DTERM_EMU -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common > -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib > -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../contr

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:31:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I insist we should officially support upgrading from X.any to X+1.0-R, > minimally. You need to either get concensis from arch@ or core@ then. > This actually doesn't affect only cross-arch case, the subject is wrong. > It affect

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:07:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:23PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > 4.x i386 and old 5.0 i386 can no longer produce current 5.0 alpha > > > > worlds due to the lack of atoll(3) in libc. This patch fixes it: > > > > > > Considering

Re: Is current 'safe' to play in again [post GCC changes/stability]

Fwiw, with tonight's -current I am seeing cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -ffreestanding -DCOMPORT=0x3f8 -DCOMSPEED=9600 -DTERM_EMU -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib -I/disk0/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../contrib/dev/acpic

Is current 'safe' to play in again [post GCC changes/stability]

I held of renewing my make buildworld/installworld state pending the GCC commit. Can I get the sense of the current-users community if its safe to put the toe back in the water? Are there one-time or other headaches one can expect from GCC .so or other objects (the runtime loader/link library ha

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

David O'Brien wrote: > Personally I do not mind requiring latest 4-STABLE to build -CURRENT > (either for cross or simple `world'). I think that is all we can > officially support. I know RU wants to be able to upgrade from say 4.1 to > 5-CURRENT. I think that is a nice thing; but if it is goin

Re: make includes

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:38:49PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > I really do not like this change, please return things such that the > > long-ingraned "cd /usr/src ; make includes". > > I planned to fix this by changing "make includes" to print > "Unwarranted chumminess with implementation". Wh

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:23PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > 4.x i386 and old 5.0 i386 can no longer produce current 5.0 alpha > > > worlds due to the lack of atoll(3) in libc. This patch fixes it: > > > > Considering how simple src/lib/libc/stdlib/atoll.c is; lets ask RE for a > > MFC. >

i386 tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

On Tue, 14 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:41:45AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > 4.x i386 and old 5.0 i386 can no longer produce current 5.0 alpha > > worlds due to the lack of atoll(3) in libc. This patch fixes it: > > Considering how simple src/lib/li

Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:21:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > > So the correct sequence is "make includes

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

If memory serves me right, Jeremy Lea wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - re > > OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It > needs some spit and polish, and probably a f

Re: make includes

--- Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > People might want to use it like that: > > make world > mv /usr/include /usr/include.old Sorry to butt in; but wouldn't it be more good if this step was done by the build scripts itself? (refering to: mv /usr/include /usr/include.old) > make incsi

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - re > > OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It > needs some spit and p

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:10:51PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Why change in the first place? > > > > What was wrong with 'make includes'? Why break POLA? > > > They were broken. See commit log for share/mk/bsd.incs.mk,v 1.1 for > a full story. I fail to see how they were broken from the

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:21:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > So the correct sequence is "make includes incsinstall". I really do not like this change, pl

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:41:45AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi! > > 4.x i386 and old 5.0 i386 can no longer produce current 5.0 alpha > worlds due to the lack of atoll(3) in libc. This patch fixes it: Considering how simple src/lib/libc/stdlib/atoll.c is; lets ask RE for a MFC. To Unsubs

Re: [PATCH] cross builds are broken (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools freebsd-native.h)

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:05:22PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:41:47AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > obrien 2002/05/10 01:41:46 PDT > > > > Modified files:(Branch: WIP_GCC31) > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools freebsd-native.h > > Log: > > Use M

Re: bad tcp cksum fffe!

On 2002-05-14 17:39, Cristan Szmajda wrote: > Dear freebsd-current, > > Any suggestions you have regarding this problem would be > much appreciated. > > My laptop running -CURRENT is suddenly generating bad TCP > checksums when talking to some IPs but not others. For > example, 129.94.209.220 i

Re: make includes

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:18:04AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:32:19PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > Installing includes just corrupts the host environment unless the new > > > includes are consistent with the old libra

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

Jeremy Lea wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > +++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 - > > [...] > > + strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX); > > + strlcat(tmp, "/INDEX", PATH_MAX); > > > > I'd suggest snprintf(3) > > Yeah

Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:32:19PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Installing includes just corrupts the host environment unless the new > > includes are consistent with the old libraries. If you know the build > > system, the includes and the libraries

S3 Savage on Thinkpad T23 using -CURRENT

Michael, Thanks for posting your Thinkpad T23 configuration. A lot has changed with regards to kernel configuration from STABLE to CURRENT. The outstanding issue with the Thinkpad T23 in CURRENT is still the S3 SAVAGE video card. I've had two folks mail their working XF86Config files (used

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > +++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 - > [...] > + strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX); > + strlcat(tmp, "/INDEX", PATH_MAX); > > I'd suggest snprintf(3) Yeah. Like I said, it needs a bit of polishing

Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002 16:34:56 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > People might want to use it like that: > > make world > mv /usr/include /usr/include.old > make incsinstall > > To remove stale includes. Previous version had "includes" that both > built and installed includes, I have just split it

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:32:19PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:21:41PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includ

Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:21:41PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > > > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" the

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

Jeremy Lea wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - re > > OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It > needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

> OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It > needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test. > > I've not implemented the -d flag since it sort of became unneeded, and > it's not really the way things are done in the rest of pkg_*. I've also > not

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:01:28PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:21:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > > So the correct sequence

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:21:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > So the correct sequence is "make includes incsinstall". > > I'm still unsure about the name; I'd

pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

Hi, On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - re OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test. I've not implemented the -d flag

[no subject]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?

On 7 Mai, Benjamin Lewis wrote: > Now, on to the problem. I use amanda for backups, and since mid-April > I've been seeing items like the following in the backup report: > > /-- akira.woss /var lev 0 FAILED [/sbin/dump returned 3] > sendbackup: start [akira.wossname.net:/var level

Re: HEADSUP: UFS2 progress.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CHOI Junho writes: > >That's amazing news for me(and hopefully other hackers). How can I see >the details of UFS2? Is there published papers or website? Nothing much yet. UFS2 contains three parts: 1. Extended Attributes. (forces inode size increase).

Re: HEADSUP: UFS2 progress.

That's amazing news for me(and hopefully other hackers). How can I see the details of UFS2? Is there published papers or website? From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: HEADSUP: UFS2 progress. Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:14:05 +0200 > > We hope to commit the UFS2 patch to -current

Re: VLock and 5.0 DP1

> When i try to compile Vlock from ports, i get: > > cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c vlock.c > cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c signals.c > cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c help.c > cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c terminal.c > cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c input.c > input.c:64: security/pam_misc.h: No such file or directo

Re: The updated socket patch and axing sotryfree() (Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1)

On Wed, 8 May 2002 09:16:56 -0700, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: bright> * Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020508 04:59] wrote: >> >> I would like to commit this patch in one or two weeks to start working >> on a possible race between a user process and a netisr kthread, >> pr

HEADSUP: UFS2 progress.

Just to keep people in the loop... I'm progressing through various issues which Kirk, Robert and I feel should not be part of the actual UFS2 commit since they are more cleanups and preparation than part of UFS2. The next major commit is the 64ification of daddr_t and friends. But don't get ca

[PATCH] cross builds are broken (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools freebsd-native.h)

On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:41:47AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2002/05/10 01:41:46 PDT > > Modified files:(Branch: WIP_GCC31) > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools freebsd-native.h > Log: > Use MD_EXEC_PREFIX now to get us thru `buildworld'. > The problem is the GCC driv

Re: bad tcp cksum fffe!

Cristan Szmajda wrote: > > Dear freebsd-current, > > Any suggestions you have regarding this problem would be > much appreciated. > > My laptop running -CURRENT is suddenly generating bad TCP > checksums when talking to some IPs but not others. For > example, 129.94.209.220 is a problem, What

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

Martin Blapp wrote: > Now rm(1) and make(1) coredump with sig 10. So I thought it > would be a good idea to recompile them with -g -ggdb and > retry. > > Now the strange part. The coredumps are gone. Ok, I did not > use -pipe then. I'll will now try to use -pipe and -g and -ggdb > all together. >

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Hello > : > : I just got my hands on a Intel 2011b Wireless card, I'm running FreeBSD > : current (dated just before gcc 3.1). > : Now my problem is that I insert the card and well

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

Hi, I see here now very strange effects. I've upgraded to the newest CURRENT yesterday, installed on the PIV machine over NFS. Now rm(1) and make(1) coredump with sig 10. So I thought it would be a good idea to recompile them with -g -ggdb and retry. Now the strange part. The coredumps are gon

[PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

Hi! 4.x i386 and old 5.0 i386 can no longer produce current 5.0 alpha worlds due to the lack of atoll(3) in libc. This patch fixes it: %%% Index: auto-host.h === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/auto-host.h,v retrie

Re: make includes

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:21:41PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > > So the correct sequence is "make includes incs

Re: make includes

On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Yes. "make includes" has been modified to mean "build includes", > and the new "make incsinstall" has been added to "install" them. > So the correct sequence is "make includes incsinstall". > > I'm still unsure about the name; I'd have liked to rename

Référencement

Bonjour , Venant de visiter votre site web , nous vous invitons à venir vous réferencer sur MonsterSexe.com , annuaire pour adultes , afin d'augmenter votre trafic . Voici le lien direct vers le formulaire d'abonnement : http://www.monstersexe.com/inscription.php3 Nous vous remercions d'avance

bad tcp cksum fffe!

Dear freebsd-current, Any suggestions you have regarding this problem would be much appreciated. My laptop running -CURRENT is suddenly generating bad TCP checksums when talking to some IPs but not others. For example, 129.94.209.220 is a problem, 17:08:47.026823 129.94.233.200.1032 > 129.