Re: LOOKUP_SHARED is default now

2002-05-05 Thread qhwt
Hi. On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:08:04AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > This patch has seriously reduced file system deadlocks for several people. > It also makes concurrent file system access much faster in certain cases. > Since I have only heard good reports and no bad reports I'm going to > enab

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so) > > [dlerror: Cannot open "/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so"] > > adding faulty module: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so > > unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so) > > [dlerr

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:31:30AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > -On [20020506 00:30], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > > > >> I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. > >> Nor do we, by default

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
-On [20020506 00:30], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > >> I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. >> Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving >> from older versions to new

Re: UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Hiten Pandya
> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > > With yesterday's -current: > > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ > > /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 > > 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ > > /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 I see the same

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. > Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving > from older versions to newer versions of CURRENT. Can you track down what the actual cause of

Re: UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > With yesterday's -current: > > lock order reversal > 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ > /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 > 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ > /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 > > FYI. Here's another from

UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Doug Barton
With yesterday's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 FYI. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. An

Re: Crash when attaching usb ethernet

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I've got a Seimens SpeedStream USB -> Ethernet adapter that when I plug > into my laptop (built -CURRENT yesterday), it always crashes. Here's the > info: snip... Of course, after a quick search, I find the thread that Joe has about the usb subsyste

Crash when attaching usb ethernet

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I've got a Seimens SpeedStream USB -> Ethernet adapter that when I plug into my laptop (built -CURRENT yesterday), it always crashes. Here's the info: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0e2 fault code = supervisor read, page not present

Would You Like To Look & Feel 10-20 Years Younger?? 3237l4

2002-05-05 Thread alconte
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00B7_16C07C6E.A3114E54"

X don't accept anything from keyboard

2002-05-05 Thread Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland -
I'm running current cvsupped two days ago. This time my X broke down. It don't accept anything from keyboard. Situation is same when using xdm or startx. I think last working world build was done two weeks ago. XFree86-4.2.0 was built 30.3.2002 and I already tried to built X-server from scrat

Re: savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On 15:17+0200, May 5, 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Hello, > > src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 > by Bill Fenner. > > It appears that a new magic value, KERNELDUMPMAGIC_CLEARED, has been > introduced but its value never #define-d in (probably) > src/sys/sys

Re: savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Maxime Henrion
Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Hello, > > src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 > by Bill Fenner. This is fixed in revision 1.4 of src/sys/sys/kerneldump.h. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello, src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 by Bill Fenner. It appears that a new magic value, KERNELDUMPMAGIC_CLEARED, has been introduced but its value never #define-d in (probably) src/sys/sys/kerneldump.h. This way, the program does not compile. There is on

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plistOR

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Sobolev
OOPS, sorry, should be fixed now. Mea culpa. -Maxim > > Hmm, really strange. I can't reproduce it here. Are you sure that you have > recompiled all of pkg_install, i.e. both libraries and utilities? > > -Maxim > > > > > > > --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
-On [20020504 20:15], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >It is only here that warnings are treated as errors. >I am thinking something in the upgrade path is not 100% thought out, trying >to see what exactly, but my focus has been way more on STABLE than CURRENT, >so some more expo

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hmm, really strange. I can't reproduce it here. Are you sure that you have recompiled all of pkg_install, i.e. both libraries and utilities? -Maxim > > > --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so) > [dlerror: Cannot open "/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so"] > adding faulty module: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so > unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so) > [dlerror: Cannot open "/usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so"] > adding

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

2002-05-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I have to take back that a kernel from april 3. runs fine. It happens there too, but few times than on recent current. The build lives for 5 minutes, instead of 30 seconds. Then I get a SIG4 as usual and cc crashes. Anybody has a idea to which date I can switch back to have my problem solv

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

2002-05-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, The problem must have been introduced after April, 3. I've a kernel.old from this date which runs perfectly. Maybe this can help to track the bug down. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproW

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist.c

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 07:49:50AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > sobomax 2002/05/04 07:49:50 PDT > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 > show.c > usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist.c > Log: > Add abi