On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:43:05 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:21:42 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > Well, who damages LOGIN_CAP processing in sshd now? It not reads
> > ~/.login_conf anymore and not sets LOGIN_CAP limits.
>
> I see parent environment seriously
I've found that wrapper needs to be updated with XFree86-4.
James.
- Original Message -
From: "John Angelmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "current" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:13 PM
Subject: Xfree86-4 problem
> After yesterdays new build I found a problem
> Xfree86-4
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:28:18AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-04-19 00:31, Chad David wrote:
> > Any comments / objections to these patches to savecore and friends?
>
> Since you asked ... :)
Yes, I did.
>
> > Index: savecore.8
> > ===
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:21:42 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Well, who damages LOGIN_CAP processing in sshd now? It not reads
> ~/.login_conf anymore and not sets LOGIN_CAP limits.
I see parent environment seriously damaged in do_setusercontext() since
not saved. I mean MAIL,BLOCKSIZE & FT
Well, who damages LOGIN_CAP processing in sshd now? It not reads
~/.login_conf anymore and not sets LOGIN_CAP limits.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I got this TWO last login lines with recent -current SSH+PAM:
--
Last login: Sat Apr 20 04:50:45
from hermes.dialup.ru
Last login: Sat Apr 20 04:56:06 2002 from hermes.dialup.ru
Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994
...
--
T
On 2002-04-19 00:31, Chad David wrote:
> Any comments / objections to these patches to savecore and friends?
Since you asked ... :)
> Index: savecore.8
> ===
> +The
> +.Nm savecore
You can safely remove "savecore" from the .Nm arg
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
>
>>After yesterdays new build I found a problem
>>Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
>
>
> Read the fine message you got at install-time and install the wrapper
> port.
>
> Kris
Wrapper is in
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> After yesterdays new build I found a problem
> Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
Read the fine message you got at install-time and install the wrapper
port.
Kris
msg37428/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Try the attached patch. You'll need to rebuild libutil and restart
> sshd.
Works.
Thanks.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL| ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http
After yesterdays new build I found a problem
Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
this is the error message I get:
AUDIT: Fri Apr 19 22:09:13 2002: 16472 XFree86: client 1 rejected from
local host
AUDIT: Fri Apr 19 22:09:15 2002: 16472 XFree86: client 1 rejected from
local host
A
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> This could lead to security problems.
Yes, I stipulated that.
> Although I really would prefer that people who are building from source pay
> attention to things like the handbook section on what to do when building
> from source:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: .if !defined(NO_SENDMAIL)
: mtree -deU -f ${.CURDIR}/mtree/sendmail.root.dist -p ${DESTDIR}/
: .endif
Wow! I hadn't read this before making my suggestion. Honest :-)
I like his solution.
Warne
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: 2. Users who don't read (or don't understand) UPDATING. This is basically,
: everybody.
Actually, UPDATING was changed last night to be more explicit about
what to do. Let's give that a chance. I don't like th
DougB> My proposal is simple. Change from using names to numeric [ug]id's
DougB> in mtree, and elsewhere if needed. The plus is that it solves the
DougB> bootstrapping problem. The negatives involve problems with systems
DougB> that don't merge the password and group files, and therefore will
Doug
Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why are you replacing /dev/kmem with the kernel path???
If you are referring to
-.Bl -tag -width /dev/kmem -compact
-.It Pa /kernel
+.Bl -tag -width /boot/kernel/kernel -compact
+.It Pa /boot/kernel/kernel
then he's doing it because "/boot/kernel/ker
> > So: I changed line 186 in sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c from
> >
> > adp->num_tags = atadev->param->queuelen;
> >
> > to
> >
> > adp->num_tags = 0x10;
> >
> > which is roughly the half of the reported queuelenght (which is 0x1F).
> >
> > And, Terry, I can't avoid to disappoint you... there's abs
Even worse, I've had the same messages _and_ all
commands accessing one particular file (/sys/i386/conf/THINKPAD if anyone's
interested) hanged completely.
--
<< Marcin Cieślak // [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curren
While I do not object to the addition of the new users for
sendmail, and I understand the theory of having them own directories for
its operation, I think that the current bootstrapping problems are
creating too greate a barrier for users who upgrade from source. There are
(at least) two g
A Creative Soundblaster PCI64 (Ensoniq Audio PCI)...
$cat at io 0xd000 irq 10 (1p/1r/0v channels duplex
default)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Long, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:23 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAI
Hi,
I updated my -current system yesterday, and I see a few lock order reversals.
This one happens during booting:
Apr 18 16:35:40 <0.2> terminus kernel: lock order reversal
Apr 18 16:35:40 <0.2> terminus kernel: 1st 0xc5ecbbb8 xl0 (network driver)
@ /var/src/sys/pci/if_xl.c:1260
Apr 18 16:35:
--- Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > If anyone recalls, I sent a post before which was about changing the
> > kernel path changes in the (only) -current man pages. As these are
> > related to -current, I am sending them
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> If anyone recalls, I sent a post before which was about changing the
> kernel path changes in the (only) -current man pages. As these are
> related to -current, I am sending them to this list for a complete
> review.
Why are you
23 matches
Mail list logo
