On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
> I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
> run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems like this before (it's
At Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:41:11 -0800,
Peter Wemm wrote:
> > e.g.
> >
> > kldload module1
> > kldload module2
> >
> > module2 cannnot resolv symbols in module1.
> >
> > -stable doesn't have this problem.
>
> module2 cannot resolve symbols in module1 unless there is a declared
> dependency. This
Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
> At Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:35:00 -0800,
> Mike Smith wrote:
> > In order to deal with this problem, I have changed the module build
> > process so that symbols global to the module are converted to local
> > symbols when the module is linked into the .kld/,ko file. In ord
At Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:35:00 -0800,
Mike Smith wrote:
> In order to deal with this problem, I have changed the module build
> process so that symbols global to the module are converted to local
> symbols when the module is linked into the .kld/,ko file. In order
> to allow modules that intentiona
Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a version of the port that links statically, so if people
> think that's enough for now, we can go with that, but I've also got
> the apache people to put up a tarball of apr, so I'm putting together
> an apr-snapshot port as well, since subver
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:59:49AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the
> > > scientific community calls an
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the
> > scientific community calls an "engineering problem" :)
> Please name it "apr-snapshot" or "apr-beta" rather
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:51:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Bitkeeper enforces the linux devleopment model
> to a large extent,
In what way(s)?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > it's problematic to do an apr port at this time because there is no
> > stable release of apr, and subversion requires bleeding edge apr to
> > function anyway.
>
> *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's
Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I've found the problem - it appears that my machine didn't have a
> /var/log/lastlog file and so far pam_lastlog.so was quite happy with
> this situation, while after a make world it doesn't tolerate it
> anymore. I am not sure that such POLA change
Hi,
i'm a freelance sys/net admin/architect who works with bsd (free/open)
in France (Paris/Bordeaux).
i'm reading your columns very regularly. Your writing are easy to
understand and that's a good point !
I'm (for now) just following mailing lists (security, hackers, stable,
current) and i want
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 06:16:20PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:
> I am using isc-dhcp3-3.0.r12 with DDNS on my FreeBSD 4.3 router a long time
> and have no problem. Shall this msg mean the port is completly integrated in
> freebsd 5?
Only the client is built as part of the base system. I think th
In message: <00cd01c1b926$82d35bb0$ef01a8c0@davidwnt>
"David Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Sorry for a bit OT, is Perforce a free software? if it is not, why
: do we need to use this property software?
Because it is useful. And all the other alternative suck too bad to
even try a
I run FreeBSD both at home and at work and I'd be happy to
provide feedback on any bugs I come across. Your article on debugging
and submitting a "proper" bug report would be helpful in making sure
that any info I submit is useful. And I'm sure that there's a thousand
others reading this
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:50:11PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> I understand that we're getting to that stage where we need more
> -current testers.
>
> We all agree that the optimal thing would be to have hordes of very
> sophisticated users who can debug problems on their own and submit
> patc
Title: Nouvelle page 2
Un ancien repris de
justice reçoit
d'un des 10 hommes les plus riches du monde
l'ancien manuscrit secret des 7 pierres des Andes
qui ont plus de 6000 ans d'âge et
Murray Stokely wrote:
>
> DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT.
>
> DHCP 3.x provides DHCP failover support, dynamic DNS updates, and much
> more.
>
> http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/dhcp-prerelease.html
>
> I've done testing with some Alpha and i386 machines on my local
> network,
Ok, I've found the problem - it appears that my machine didn't have a
/var/log/lastlog file and so far pam_lastlog.so was quite happy with
this situation, while after a make world it doesn't tolerate it
anymore. I am not sure that such POLA change is good and IMO
pam_lastlog.so shouldn't refuse lo
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> Ok, I've found the problem - it appears that my machine didn't have a
> /var/log/lastlog file and so far pam_lastlog.so was quite happy with
> this situation, while after a make world it doesn't tolerate it
> anymore. I am not sure that such POLA change is good and IMO
s
If memory serves me right, Murray Stokely wrote:
> DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT.
Cool. We're still shipping just the client part, right?
Bruce.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Daniel Rock schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> during a "make release" run I got two panics in -CURRENT (from Feb 16).
> Both panics occured during high I/O rates.
Just an additional note: The kernel from Feb 9 also panic'd this morning.
I have now newfs'd the file system and are running the tests again.
D
As someone who's just starting down this path as well, I'd say the
sooner the better.
Later,
George
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In an ideal world, you're correct.
The real question here should have been: do those people who are
actively committing rapidly to the tree want to see this happen? They
are the people who will realistically have to deal with the PRs.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:01:42PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrot
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:50:11PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> It seems that the best we can hope for is to educate some of the
> braver users who are ready to take the next step and are willing to
> donate some time to us.
>
Very good idea. I probably qualify as a good representation of th
Hi,
Just upgraded by -current box and after a reboot found that I'm no
longer able to log-in neither from console, nor from the network.
Following is the log:
FreeBSD/i386 (notebook) (ttyv0)
login: root
Password:
Feb 19 19:59:35 notebook login: pan_open_session(): Error in service
module
FreeB
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:50:11PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
Hi Michael,
> It seems that the best we can hope for is to educate some of the
> braver users who are ready to take the next step and are willing to
> donate some time to us.
Agreed. I think there are people out there willing to hel
I understand that we're getting to that stage where we need more
-current testers.
We all agree that the optimal thing would be to have hordes of very
sophisticated users who can debug problems on their own and submit
patches to fix all their issues. I would guess that we all also agree
that tha
I am using isc-dhcp3-3.0.r12 with DDNS on my FreeBSD 4.3 router a long time
and have no problem. Shall this msg mean the port is completly integrated in
freebsd 5?
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Murray Stokely
> Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:07:24AM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote:
> DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT.
>
> DHCP 3.x provides DHCP failover support, dynamic DNS updates, and much
> more.
>
> http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/dhcp-prerelease.html
>
I've been pushing for this for a whi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michal Mertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I have Xircom CBEM-56G (on card printed RBEM-56G-100) which used to be
: detected on boot without problem on -CURRENT. After todays cvsup and
: buildworld the card is no longer detected. It works when I unplug i
[Sorry for a cross-post, it's intentional.]
The patch below brings us the following functionality:
1. FreeBSD 4.0 can be source upgraded to FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE.
(Only "standard" make world has been tested, with an empty
/etc/make.conf.)
FreeBSD 4.0 could be source upgraded to FreeBS
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:46:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the
> > > scientific community calls an "
Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the
> > scientific community calls an "engineering problem" :)
> at the moment, the primary thing holding me back is
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:34:10PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > > As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points
> > > you to the port skeleton for ver
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > it's a little out of date now, but i will be updating it to the next
> > release as soon as it is released (this week sometime) and submitting
> > it back to freebsd for inclusio
Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points
> > you to the port skeleton for version r909. Is yours better/different?
> i imagine his is more up to date ;-)
Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it's a little out of date now, but i will be updating it to the next
> release as soon as it is released (this week sometime) and submitting
> it back to freebsd for inclusion in the ports tree.
I've attached my patch to save you the trouble.
> it's
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which
> > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than
> > Perforce. After using Pe
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:16:18PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which
> > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than
> > Perforce.
>
> Oh, and it supports li
I have Xircom CBEM-56G (on card printed RBEM-56G-100) which used to be
detected on boot without problem on -CURRENT. After todays cvsup and
buildworld the card is no longer detected. It works when I unplug it and
put it back.
Is it expected behaviour? It seems to me it can be and the commit is wo
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which
> does all that and more, and has much better diff support than
> Perforce. After using Perforce for my PAM work, I've come to the
> conclusion that although
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It has good points and bad points
> > the bad point is that you can't work offline.
> > the good point is that development in different branches doesn't
> > slow each other down.
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which
> does all that and more, and has much better diff support than
> Perforce.
Oh, and it supports limited offline operation without the need for a
local repo (by caching unmodified
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has good points and bad points
> the bad point is that you can't work offline.
> the good point is that development in different branches doesn't
> slow each other down. (as it might in CVS).
> It also keeps track of edits that touch multiple files
DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT.
DHCP 3.x provides DHCP failover support, dynamic DNS updates, and much
more.
http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/dhcp-prerelease.html
I've done testing with some Alpha and i386 machines on my local
network, but it's certainly possible that the new
Here is the most up-to-date version of pgrp/session lock (at Change 6700):
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/pgrp10.diff.gz
I would like to commit this on the next Sunday. Otherwise, my patch
would conflict with other patches, especially tty.
--
Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[E
the client is free for free software projects
(the server too I guess,)
It has good points and bad points
the bad point is that you can't work offline.
the good point is that development in different branches doesn't
slow each other down. (as it might in CVS).
It also keeps track of edits that to
exactly
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > The fully safe version of this code is:
> > td->td_retval[0] = td->td_ucred->cr_ruid;
> > td->td_retval[1] = td->td_ucred->cr_uid;
> > return (0);
> >
> > because td->td_ucred is read-only for it's whole existance.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Wemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.
> Everybody who can commit to cvs on freefa
:>
:> because td->td_ucred is read-only for it's whole existance.
:
:???
:
:Are you sure that td->td_ucred can't change in the middle,
:to point to a different ucred, as a result of kernel
:preemption?
:
:-- Terry
I don't think that's possible though it might bring up a potential
issue
* Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020219 00:42] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:36:30PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > Use a smaller path. Or dig up bde's fixes to config from the
> > > archives.
> >
> > That is only a temporary fix. LINT will eventually be larger than
> > the world.
> >
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:36:30PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Use a smaller path. Or dig up bde's fixes to config from the
> > archives.
>
> That is only a temporary fix. LINT will eventually be larger than
> the world.
>
> The list of files passed to mkdep should be split up a bit.
that i
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Any idea on how to fix this ?
>
> Use a smaller path. Or dig up bde's fixes to config from the
> archives.
That is only a temporary fix. LINT will eventually b
53 matches
Mail list logo
