Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
> > > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that > > > mmap's exectuable the ld.so itself, and then does manual > > > lookup of the dl entry points, providing symbols for them > > > which are actually externed functions wrapping dereferenced > > > function pointers. > > > > > > It's j

Re: rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi! > > Please test with and without this patch. Hmm. I'm having a little trouble testing this on -CURRENT. As a first step, I just deleted all of the 127/8 blocking code in ip_output.c, and tried to do a rdr to 127.0.0.1. First,

Re: PAM Error

2002-02-13 Thread Thyer, Matthew
>> Yesterday I tried to use SWAT for the first time since the PAM configs were >> moved from /etc/pam.conf and I'm getting the following error: >> >> Feb 6 22:54:05 galaxy swat: PAM _pam_init_handlers: could not open >> /etc/pam.conf >> >> What do I need to do to fix this? > >Recompile the app

Re: TV + sound freezes machine

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Michael Nottebrock wrote: > The problem: Watching TV and starting some application that accesses > /dev/dsp (like xmms, artsd or the linux-netscape flash-plugin) (or vice > versa) freezes my machine. The problem exists since I first installed > -CURRENT from an early January-Snapshot, at the mo

Re: Ethernet tunnel device

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:13:58AM -0800, whoever wrote: > > how come it gets lost in the vmware case and not in your simple app. > > also does ifconfig report that the vmnet device is opened by the pid > > of your app between open and close of the simple app? > > There's on

Re: rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > RFC1122 requires the host to not send 127/8 addresses out of loopback, > > whether or not its routes are set up correctly. > > As we have already seen, there is not consensus on this particular > issue, or on the general issue of how much of 1122 we should pay

Re: rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:50:13AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > > > Please test with and without this patch. > > > > I continue to believe that this should be done by fixing the routing, > > not by adding additional hacks to the already-bloated ip_output(

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > building programm with -g gives no more information at all, I have tried > > Linking aginst static library - works. > > This suggests a problem with the runtime-linker (rtld), not binutils. Wor

Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Max Khon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:55:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so > > > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD? > > > > > > no. > > > > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that > > mmap

Re: Problem with a carbus Realtek 8139 card

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Miguel Mendez wrote: > And compiled a kernel modifying the NEWCARD template. Everything works > fine , except from time to time the network stops working. If I do a > ifconfig rl0 down and then ifconfig rl0 up it starts working again. Any > idea why is this happening? If I use the 16bit pcmcia ni

ODBIORCO! Znaleziono wirusa w liscie do Ciebie !

2002-02-13 Thread basia
Uzytkownik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wyslal Ci wirusa. - Skaner antywirusowy LM.internet rozpoznal: - suspicion: Exploit.IFrame.FileDownload Tnokd.pif infected: I-Worm.Klez.e -

Re: Ethernet tunnel device

2002-02-13 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:32:06AM -0800, whoever wrote: > > There's one difference between vmware and a little hacked up test app. > > Linux emulation. It certaintly shouldn't matter, but it might be worth > > compiling the test program on a linux machine and seeing it it leaves > > the device i

Panic at schedcpu+0x13d with today's -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread David Wolfskill
So... I'm at BSDCon; got today's -STABLE & -CURRENT built & running (serially) on the build machine. I then "cloned" the slice for today's -CURRENT from slice 4 to slice 3, cleaned up the source tree a bit, then went through the process Greg Shapiro posted for setting up sendmail 8.12.2 for testi

Re: Witness and rpm

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Nottebrock
whoever wrote: > Hi, > Just to let you guys know that if you have > options WITNESS > and perhaps INVARIANTS > enabled in the kernel it will panic() while installing > any of the rpm packages from the ports (mostly linux > programs). I saw this behavior in my kernel which is > a coup

Re: Witness and rpm

2002-02-13 Thread Tim Liddelow
I was having these problems consistently until recently. Make sure you linux kernel module is in sync with your kernel. Cheers whoever wrote: >Hi, > Just to let you guys know that if you have >optionsWITNESS >and perhaps INVARIANTS >enabled in the kernel it will panic() while

Re: Ethernet tunnel device

2002-02-13 Thread whoever
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:19:37AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:13:58AM -0800, whoever wrote: > > > > how come it gets lost in the vmware case and not in your simple app. > > also does ifconfig report that the vmnet device is opened by the pid > > of your app between op

Witness and rpm

2002-02-13 Thread whoever
Hi, Just to let you guys know that if you have options WITNESS and perhaps INVARIANTS enabled in the kernel it will panic() while installing any of the rpm packages from the ports (mostly linux programs). I saw this behavior in my kernel which is a couple of days older than the cvs. i

Re: Ethernet tunnel device

2002-02-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:13:58AM -0800, whoever wrote: > > how come it gets lost in the vmware case and not in your simple app. > also does ifconfig report that the vmnet device is opened by the pid > of your app between open and close of the simple app? There's one difference between vmware a

Re: Ethernet tunnel device

2002-02-13 Thread whoever
FROM: Mark SantcroosDATE: 02/12/2002 02:58:30SUBJECT: RE: Ethernet tunnel device On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:14:32PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: |> It sounds like there's some sort of a bug in the close code. You are |> sure the previous instance is really gone, right? If it is, that's |> anothe

Re: rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > RFC1122 requires the host to not send 127/8 addresses out of loopback, > whether or not its routes are set up correctly. As we have already seen, there is not consensus on this particular issue, or on the general issue of how much of 1122 we should pay attention to at all. (Are you go

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Peter Schultz
David O'Brien wrote: > This is not much of a bug report. Was libpng compiled with new binuils > or old? Someone that is having problems (which I am not), needs to > compile things with -g, not strip them, use gdb and provide a REAL bug > report. > In /etc/make.conf I have: CFLAGS= -O0 -g -pipe

Re: BSDCON activities 2night?

2002-02-13 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 05:16:26PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Anyone making the usual plans or should I just look for the terminal room? I'd recommend getting on to the mailing list with details at: http://lists.csociety.org/listinfo/bsdcon/ where we're trying to keep announcements and

Re: rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:50:13AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Please test with and without this patch. > > I continue to believe that this should be done by fixing the routing, > not by adding additional hacks to the already-bloated ip_output() > path. > BSD always had these

Re: wdm 1.20 wont run on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:23:33PM +0500, Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky wrote: > MT> I tried to look with ports/devel/ddd but got stuck by the fact > MT> that the problem seems to be ld-elf.so.1 and not wdm. > > MT> (gdb) core-file /wdm.core > MT> Core was generated by `wdm'. > MT> Program terminated

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > It was in chroot created today as: > ># cd /usr/src ># cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs upd -dP ># make buildworld ># make installworld DESTDIR=/X/chroot ># cd /usr/src/etc && make destri

rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Please test with and without this patch. I continue to believe that this should be done by fixing the routing, not by adding additional hacks to the already-bloated ip_output() path. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Андрей Чернов
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:02:51 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > This is not much of a bug report. Was libpng compiled with new binuils > or old? Someone that is having problems (which I am not), needs to > compile things with -g, not strip them, use gdb and provide a REAL bug > report. I just

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:59:02PM +0300, Andrej Cernov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote: > > > > Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup > > > > >How-To-Repeat: > > > > % cat > trypng.c > > #include > > > > main(in

Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Андрей Чернов
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote: > > Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup > > >How-To-Repeat: > > % cat > trypng.c > #include > > main(int ac, char ** av) > { > printf("Hello World\n"); > } > ^D > % gcc -o trypng trypn

libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Vladimir B . Grebenschikov
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Vladimir B. Grebenschikov >Organization: SWsoft >Confidential: no >Synopsis: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: Free

Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:55:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so > > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD? > > > > no. > > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that > mmap's exectuable the

Problem with a carbus Realtek 8139 card

2002-02-13 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi people, I installed -CURRENT on my laptop: FreeBSD saioa.energyhq.tk 5.0-CURRENT-20020204-JPSNAP FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-20020204-JPSNAP #0: Fri Feb 8 13:09:05 CET 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SAIOA i386 And compiled a kernel modifying the NEWCARD template. Everything work

Re: [FIXED] /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current

2002-02-13 Thread Georg-W Koltermann
Yes, that seems to fix it, although I had a spontaneous system lockup while I was running with this patch. I have no idea wether the lockup was connected to that patch; I am running that code again right now and it does not lockup. Many thanks to Munehiro and Takanori. Maybe someone else with a

Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Martin Blapp wrote: > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD? > > no. It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that mmap's exectuable the ld.so itself, and then does manual lookup of the dl entry points, pro

Re: wdm 1.20 wont run on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Matthew Thyer ]-- | I have seen this for about a month or two on more than one machine. Try building without PAM support. When wdm breaks for me, rebuilding with no PAM generally fixes it. -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| | Andrew Milt

Re: wdm 1.20 wont run on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky
G'day! Wednesday, February 13, 2002, 2:01:39 PM, you wrote: MT> I tried to look with ports/devel/ddd but got stuck by the fact MT> that the problem seems to be ld-elf.so.1 and not wdm. MT> (gdb) core-file /wdm.core MT> Core was generated by `wdm'. MT> Program terminated with signal 10, Bus erro

Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD? no. There are plans to write a nssd proxy deamon for FreeBSD which does support loadable modules. I'll make nectar and my plans available in the next time. The goal is the

rdr 127.0.0.1 and blocking 127/8 in ip_output()

2002-02-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! Please test with and without this patch. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.ora

wdm 1.20 wont run on -CURRENT

2002-02-13 Thread Matthew Thyer
I have seen this for about a month or two on more than one machine. xdm works fine. Rebuilds over some time have no effect. I have now built the world and wdm with -g and still have all the source and objects. Kernel config attached. What further info would you like ? And please give me some