Re: Panic in ufs_dirbad()

2002-01-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:53:32PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 13:44] wrote: > > Any ideas? This is a reasonably recent 5-CURRENT (last > > makeworld/makekernel 7 days ago). > > This may be fallout from my initial fdlocking work, please try > an up

$B"#$G$"$$$N7hDjHG"#$"$($^$9$M$C(B$B$H"#(B

2002-01-24 Thread $B$"$($^$9$M$C$H(B
$B$44uK>$KE:$o$:$3$N%a!<%k$,FO$$$F$7$^$$$^$7$?$i$*http://www.aemasu.net/ === To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Panic in ufs_dirbad()

2002-01-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 13:44] wrote: > Any ideas? This is a reasonably recent 5-CURRENT (last > makeworld/makekernel 7 days ago). This may be fallout from my initial fdlocking work, please try an update or get a debug traceback and we'll see. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

loopback nfs broken?

2002-01-24 Thread Matthew Jacob
linking kernel.debug nfs server nellie:/space/compiles: not responding 10 > 9 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Panic in ufs_dirbad()

2002-01-24 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Any ideas? This is a reasonably recent 5-CURRENT (last makeworld/makekernel 7 days ago). -Maxim Script started on Thu Jan 24 23:27:51 2002 root@notebook# gdb -k /boot/kernel/kernel vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Ge

panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir

2002-01-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
Is anyone else seeing this? Kris GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There

Re: FreeBSD 5.x

2002-01-24 Thread Jason Andresen
Terry Lambert wrote: > > Jason Andresen wrote: > > Odd, I can't reproduce that under RedHat: > > I guess you are saying there is a conspiracy to make GCC work > only on RedHat? > > I could believe that... 8-) 8-) 8-). > > Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2. > > If that's been fixed, I gues

Re: cvs commit: src/include unistd.h src/lib/libc/sys brk.2 src/libexec/rtld-aout rtld.c src/libexec/rtld-elf malloc.c

2002-01-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:25:54PM +, David Malone wrote: > > Cool, thanks! > > Bruch pointed out that we still have a small problem with the man > page. Both brk and sbrk are now library functions, but their man > page is still in section 2. > Hmm, I see. The proper fix would be to repo-co

Re: FreeBSD 5.x

2002-01-24 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 23 Jan, Terry Lambert wrote: >> [gcc 3.0.x bug] >> > Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2. >> > >> > If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the >> > non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms >> > works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?). >

Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self pam_self.c

2002-01-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > des 2002/01/24 04:47:43 PST > > Modified files: > lib/libpam/modules/pam_self pam_self.c > Log: > Don't let root through unless the "even_root" option was specified. > > Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs > > Revision Ch