Please DISREGARD my previous message on this topic...
I have issued myself a severe boot to the head in the true tradition of tai-kwan-leap
as a result of sending that, so if you must,
please remember that I booted myself in the head first, and was enlightened by the
experience.
jim
--
ET ha
just installed today's -current on one of my boxes. This is a 900MHz athlon
with a logitech wireless keyboard & mouse USB. Any keystroke or mouse move
now produces the following:
usb1: interrupt, but not for us
Other than spitting out about 5 of those for every action, the box is
accepting in
i noticed this after a build from -current of about 24 hours ago:
due to problems getting kde-2.2 to compile under -current, I am currently using
windowmaker and doing a `exec startx >&/dev/null` to
get into X without leaving a console shell open...
the problem i have is that when i switched b
This seems to solve the problem. Thank you.
How soon before VESA will be stable? I do prefer a 132x60 text-mode console...
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> Would you please remove the vesa driver from the kernel and
> do not try loading the vesa module either, and see if things work?
>
>
>>Actuall
On 22 Aug, Julian Elischer wrote:
> so call me ignorant but what IS webdav? (or even dav)
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Seems like Apple has webdavfs for OS X... Any hope for a FreeBSD
>> version? At least -- source? At least with an NDA, so binary modules can
>> b
Richard Todd wrote:
> In servalan.mailinglist.fbsd-current you write:
>
> >I just upgraded to the latest sources (two hours ago) on my VAIO laptop and
> >I'm now getting dozens of messages:
>
> >Aug 22 15:00:07 sidhe /boot/kernel/kernel: usb0: interrupt, but not for us
> >Aug 22 15:00:51 sidhe l
so call me ignorant but what IS webdav? (or even dav)
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seems like Apple has webdavfs for OS X... Any hope for a FreeBSD
> version? At least -- source? At least with an NDA, so binary modules can
> be made available for -stable and -current?
Seems like Apple has webdavfs for OS X... Any hope for a FreeBSD
version? At least -- source? At least with an NDA, so binary modules can
be made available for -stable and -current?
Do our new Apple employees wield enough influence?
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
WebDAV seems to be becoming increasingly official (www.webdav.org;
/usr/ports/www/{neon,cadaver}; standard part of Apache-2.0)... I wonder
if anyone looked at the possibility of creating a webdavfs module --
like smbfs, for example?..
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
In servalan.mailinglist.fbsd-current you write:
>I just upgraded to the latest sources (two hours ago) on my VAIO laptop and
>I'm now getting dozens of messages:
>Aug 22 15:00:07 sidhe /boot/kernel/kernel: usb0: interrupt, but not for us
>Aug 22 15:00:51 sidhe last message repeated 8 times
>Aug
I guess we can summarize now? :-)
1) If you are the author of software, it's a bad idea to simply release code
into the Public Domain, mainly because you can't protect your self from
litigation by placing disclaimers in your code.
2) Public Domain means you relinquish your copyright contro
+---[ Giorgos Keramidas ]--
|
| Yep. True. The only problem is that if Charles Mott makes changes at
| a later date to his codebase, changes cannot be merged to the FreeBSD
| version without permission from him, even if the patches apply cleanly
| and break nothing that F
:Yes, and no. Distributing the exact same sources (with an extra
:copyright part) that says somebody should not copy and distribute it,
:as if it were in the public domain, a few weeks after is probably
:fraud. Arguments like "but I put extra work in this second
:distribution, since I made this
> >Maybe, but bus_dmamap_load() only lets you map one buffer at a time.
> >I want to map a bunch of little buffers, and the API doesn't let me
> >do that. And I don't want to change the API, because that would mean
> >modifying busdma_machdep.c on each platform, which is a hell that I
> >would ra
Please only back out the part that early outs on no interrupt for us at
all. There are some other changes in there which might indicate other
problems, like interrupt masks set wrong and interrupts from the
controller we are not but should be handling.
I didn't realise that PCI devices were that
From: Crist J. Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Copyright Contradiction in libalias
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 04:29:13PM -0700
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 04:46:07PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > However, I can't retroactively take away the rights of anyone who has
> > gotten my 'public
From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Copyright Contradiction in libalias
Date: Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:24:56AM -0600
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes:
> : >
> : > Once it's in the Public Domain you have abandoned your claim to copyright.
> :
> : On that releas
>
>> The fact that the data is less than a page in size matters little
>> to the bus dma concept. In other words, how is this packet presented
>> to the hardware? Does it care that all of the component pieces are
>> < PAGE_SIZE in length? Probably not. It just wants the list of
>> address/leng
> The fact that the data is less than a page in size matters little
> to the bus dma concept. In other words, how is this packet presented
> to the hardware? Does it care that all of the component pieces are
> < PAGE_SIZE in length? Probably not. It just wants the list of
> address/length pai
Same thing here, started with the build this morning...
I know of one change that had been done in the past 36 hours to usb, but it should not
have done this, as the patches I was using
didn't produce this before the committer committed the patches.
Maybe something else got changed as well?
V
"Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" wrote:
> Ollivier Robert writes:
> > I just upgraded to the latest sources (two hours ago) on my VAIO laptop an
d
> > I'm now getting dozens of messages:
> >
> > Aug 22 15:00:07 sidhe /boot/kernel/kernel: usb0: interrupt, but not for us
> > Aug 22 15:00:51 sid
>> >My understanding is that you need a dmamap for every buffer that you want
>> >to map into bus space.
>>
>> You need one dmamap for each independantly manageable mapping. A
>> single mapping may result in a long list of segments, regardless
>> of whether you have a single KVA buffer or multip
> >My understanding is that you need a dmamap for every buffer that you want
> >to map into bus space.
>
> You need one dmamap for each independantly manageable mapping. A
> single mapping may result in a long list of segments, regardless
> of whether you have a single KVA buffer or multiple KVA
hello, world\n
I'm running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Aug 6 23:23:45 CEST 2001.
I turn on my box once a day when I come home and I recently noticed
that about 1 out of 4 boots it tells me
/boot/kernel/kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
/boot/kernel/kernel: WARNING: /home was not pr
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 07:02:54 +0200, Slawek Zak wrote:
> I have 2 such controlers in a Dell 6400. Both did work on 4.3-STABLE,
> updated about 4 weeks ago. After upgrade to 4.4-RC none of them is
> detected during boot. Did the ahc driver `suffer' some dramatic
> changes lately?
There was some
++ 21/08/01 02:21 +0200 - Salvo Bartolotta:
|| I am using XFree4 and my /etc/make.conf contains the required XFree86
|| version string.
||
|| opengl/qgl.h:63: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory
|| opengl/qgl.h:64: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory
| These are included in || the Mesa p
> : On that released version, yes. But, not on subsuquent versions. I
> : still maintain my rights to do with the code as I please.
>
> Then you are creating a new work, based on the public domain work that
> went before it.
I think we're splitting hairs here. Ultimately, the exact same behav
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I mean common part of international copyright law.
>
> There is no such thing as ``international copyright law''. There is
> only national copyright law. Parties to the various international
> copyright conventions agree to harmoni
Title: newlogo
Personalise You Nokia with these great Logos!!!
Bitch
21692
< said:
> I mean common part of international copyright law.
There is no such thing as ``international copyright law''. There is
only national copyright law. Parties to the various international
copyright conventions agree to harmonize their national law to meet a
particular standard of protec
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:48:52 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > No, "author" part of copyright can't be deattached, unless fraud happens.
>
> Only if you live in a country whose legal system recognizes ``moral
> rights''.
I mean common part of international copyright law. F.e. Sh
< said:
> No, "author" part of copyright can't be deattached, unless fraud happens.
Only if you live in a country whose legal system recognizes ``moral
rights''.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ollivier Robert writes:
> I just upgraded to the latest sources (two hours ago) on my VAIO laptop and
> I'm now getting dozens of messages:
>
> Aug 22 15:00:07 sidhe /boot/kernel/kernel: usb0: interrupt, but not for us
> Aug 22 15:00:51 sidhe last message repeated 8 times
> Aug 22 15:03:02
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vladimir B. Grebensch
ikov" さんいわく:
>
>acpidump - dumps a lot of information
>
>But there are some problems with using acpi:
>
>1st: it seems that acpi not emulates apm interface (/dev/{apm,apmctl}) so
> apm-based utilites don't work (apmd, zzz, monit
In the last episode (Aug 22), Vladimir B. Grebenschikov said:
>
> I have message "kernel: cmd soffice.bin pid 4690 tried to use
> non-present sched_yield" in logs triing to run staroffice on -CURRENT.
Add
options P1003_1B
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
options _KPOS
Hi
Anybody tried subj ?
It compiles in, and seems to work:
Aug 17 14:16:58 vbook /boot/kernel/kernel: ACPI debug layer 0x0 debug level 0x0
Aug 17 14:16:59 vbook /boot/kernel/kernel: acpi0: on motherboard
Aug 17 14:16:59 vbook /boot/kernel/kernel: acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed
fe
I have message "kernel: cmd soffice.bin pid 4690 tried to use
non-present sched_yield" in logs triing to run staroffice on -CURRENT.
But staroffice run fine, what about plans on implementing sched_yield()
in kernel trhreads ?
# uname -r
5.0-CURRENT
#
Aug 22 17:30:03 vbook /boot/kernel/kernel:
I just upgraded to the latest sources (two hours ago) on my VAIO laptop and
I'm now getting dozens of messages:
Aug 22 15:00:07 sidhe /boot/kernel/kernel: usb0: interrupt, but not for us
Aug 22 15:00:51 sidhe last message repeated 8 times
Aug 22 15:03:02 sidhe last message repeated 19 times
Aug 2
Andrew Kenneth Milton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once it's in the Public Domain you have abandoned your claim to copyright.
Actually, that is not possible, at least in some countries
(including Germany, for example).
If you're the author of some piece of software, you're the
holder of the "Ur
Well I have reached "milestone 2"
I have a kernel in which teh 'struct proc' pointers have been replaced
wherever needed with struct thread pointers and where
the process structure ahs been split to create 4 substructures.
At this stage I can get to multi-user mode but it doesn't last
too far i
40 matches
Mail list logo
