On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
> soon.
>
> The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
> builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now,
On 04-Aug-01 Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I decided I was going to brave 5.0-CURRENT and give the snapshots
> available on current.jp.freebsd.org a try. I found a couple issues with
> installation disks (FWIW, I tried it on the lastest snapshot avail on
> current.freebsd.org. I got the same results).
>
I wrote:
> An increasing number of executables on that box are sporting ever
> newer mtimes. This appears to have been going on ever since the
> Jul 25 update. There is no clear pattern which executables are
> touched. md5 comparisons with previous backup levels (using a Jul 13
> copy of md5)
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:26:34AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> Back in the old days -stable was reserved for bug fixes and some
> features/enhancements. ABI and API changes weren't allowed. When
> someone made a mistake, they got the same clout across the back of
> the head that they do now
I've cc'd freebsd-current here.
This is a followup to a small thread on the UK user group list about
the stability of -stable.
Joe Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:42:44PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> >=20
> > This hasn't suddenly changed in FreeBSD -- the -curr
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) For some reason, my mdmfs line in /etc/fstab always does a chmod
> 777 /tmp at mount-time
>
> /dev/md0/tmpmfs rw,-s=65536 0 0
As previously threatened, I implemented bug-to-bug compatibility with
mount_mfs()
According to Mark Murray:
> Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used?
I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509
based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly
recent option.
AUTOKEY should be enough. A
According to Gordon Tetlow:
> >From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has
> never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work.
That's correct.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:30:42AM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:34:41PM -0400, a little birdie told me
> that Garance A Drosihn remarked
> > At 11:18 PM -0700 7/17/01, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > >If I had to guess, I'd put the total [genuine] -current userbase
> >
= 26 (irq10:sn0)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
syncing disks...
done
Uptime: 2s
FWIW, it's 5.0-20010804-JPSNAP #0 available off of current.jp.freebsd.org.
I noticed it said it was in sn0. So being industrious, I interrupted the
autoboot and did:
ok set hint.sn.0.disabled=1
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mixtim wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his
> > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he
> > is. Almost as bad as Linus.
>
> :pserv
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his
> ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he
> is. Almost as bad as Linus.
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp
You can checkou
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:18:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> So let me guess. Not only does Mills think that the web is the only
> sensible distribution medium for documentation, he also thinks that
> English is the only sensible language for it?
Ha, y
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:21:14PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:13:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> # On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> # > what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
> # > pain.
> #
> #
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry to bug this list with this question. I'd like to test the newer
> ray(4) driver that's in -CURRENT. What snapshot should I install? Is
> there anything else I should know before installing -CURRENT? (besides
> what the "cutting edge" section of the
Peter Sides
16 matches
Mail list logo
